Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University, 5-21-16 Omori-nishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8540, Japan.
Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Toho University, 6-11-1 Omori-nishi, Ota-ku, Tokyo, 143-8541, Japan.
Heart Vessels. 2021 Jul;36(7):1088-1097. doi: 10.1007/s00380-021-01830-1. Epub 2021 Mar 24.
To characterize in vivo anti-atrial fibrillatory potential and pharmacological safety profile of ranolazine having I plus I inhibitory actions in comparison with those of clinically available anti-atrial fibrillatory drugs; namely, dronedarone, amiodarone, bepridil and dl-sotalol in our previous studies, ranolazine dihydrochloride in sub-therapeutic (0.3 mg/kg) and supra-therapeutic (3 mg/kg) doses was intravenously infused over 10 min to the halothane-anesthetized dogs (n = 5). The low dose increased the heart rate, cardiac output and atrioventricular conduction velocity possibly via vasodilator action-induced, reflex-mediated increase of adrenergic tone. Meanwhile, the high dose decreased the heart rate, ventricular contraction, cardiac output and mean blood pressure, indicating that drug-induced direct actions may exceed the reflex-mediated compensation. In addition, it prolonged the atrial and ventricular effective refractory periods, of which potency and selectivity for the former were less great compared with those of the clinically-available drugs. Moreover, it did not alter the ventricular early repolarization period in vivo, but prolonged the late repolarization with minimal risk for re-entrant arrhythmias. These in vivo findings of ranolazine suggest that I suppression may attenuate I inhibition-associated prolongation of early repolarization in the presence of reflex-mediated increase of adrenergic tone. Thus, ranolazine alone may be less promising as an anti-atrial fibrillatory drug, but its potential risk for inducing torsade de pointes will be small. These information can be used as a guide to predict the utility and adverse effects of anti-atrial fibrillatory drugs having multi-channel modulatory action.
为了描述雷诺嗪的体内抗房颤潜力和药理学安全性特征,我们之前的研究中比较了雷诺嗪(具有 I 型和 I 型抑制作用)与临床可用的抗房颤药物(即多非利特、胺碘酮、贝拉普罗和 dl-索他洛尔)的作用。在本研究中,用 sub-therapeutic(0.3 mg/kg)和 supra-therapeutic(3 mg/kg)剂量的雷诺嗪二盐酸盐静脉输注 10 分钟,观察其对 halothane 麻醉犬的作用(n=5)。低剂量可能通过血管扩张作用引起的反射介导的肾上腺素能张力增加,增加心率、心输出量和房室传导速度。而高剂量则降低心率、心室收缩、心输出量和平均血压,表明药物直接作用可能超过反射介导的代偿。此外,它延长了心房和心室有效不应期,其对前者的效价和选择性与临床可用药物相比则较低。此外,它不会改变体内心室早期复极,而是延长晚期复极,很少有引发折返性心律失常的风险。这些雷诺嗪的体内研究结果表明,I 型抑制的抑制作用可能会减弱肾上腺素能张力反射介导增加时早期复极的延长。因此,雷诺嗪单独作为抗房颤药物的前景可能不大,但它引起尖端扭转型室性心动过速的潜在风险较小。这些信息可以作为预测具有多通道调制作用的抗房颤药物的疗效和不良反应的指南。