• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

降低结直肠癌筛查年龄可改善微观模拟模型预测的结果。

Lowering the colorectal cancer screening age improves predicted outcomes in a microsimulation model.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Exact Sciences Corporation, Madison, WI, USA.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Jun;37(6):1005-1010. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1908244. Epub 2021 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1080/03007995.2021.1908244
PMID:33769894
Abstract

AIMS

While most guidelines still recommend colorectal cancer (CRC) screening initiation at age 50 years in average-risk individuals, guideline-creating bodies are starting to lower the recommended age of initiation to 45 years to mitigate the trend of increasing CRC rates in younger populations. Using CRC-AIM, we modeled the impact of lowering the CRC screening initiation age, incorporating theoretical and reported adherence rates, for triennial multi-target stool DNA (mt-sDNA) or annual fecal immunochemical test (FIT) screening.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Screening strategies were simulated for individuals without CRC at age 40 and screened from ages 50 to 75 or 45 to 75 years. Outcomes included CRC incidence, CRC mortality, and life-years gained (LYG) per 1000 individuals screened (compared with no screening). Models used theoretically perfect (100%) and previously reported (71% mt-sDNA; 43% FIT) adherence rates.

RESULTS

With perfect adherence, mt-sDNA and FIT resulted in 22.2 and 23.4 more predicted LYG, respectively, with screening initiation at age 45 versus 50 years; reported adherence resulted in 23.9 and 24.4 more LYG, respectively. With perfect adherence, screening initiation at age 45 versus 50 years resulted in 26.1 and 28.6 CRC cases, respectively, with mt-sDNA and 22.8 and 25.5 cases with FIT; with reported real-world adherence there were 28.5 and 31.2 cases, respectively, with mt-sDNA and 37.1 and 40.2 cases with FIT. Similar patterns were observed for CRC deaths. With screening initiation at age 45 and reported adherence, mt-sDNA averted 8.6 more CRC cases and 3.3 more deaths per 1000 individuals than FIT.

CONCLUSIONS

Estimated CRC screening outcomes improved by lowering the initiation age from 50 to 45 years. Incorporating reported adherence rates yields greater benefits from triennial mt-sDNA versus annual FIT screening.

摘要

目的

尽管大多数指南仍建议在平均风险人群中于 50 岁开始进行结直肠癌(CRC)筛查,但制定指南的机构正开始将建议的起始年龄降低至 45 岁,以减轻年轻人群 CRC 发病率上升的趋势。我们使用 CRC-AIM 模型,针对年龄在 40 岁且无 CRC 的个体,模拟了降低 CRC 筛查起始年龄的影响,纳入了理论和报告的依从率,用于每 3 年一次的多靶点粪便 DNA(mt-sDNA)或每年一次的粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)筛查。

方法和材料

对 50 岁至 75 岁或 45 岁至 75 岁进行筛查的无 CRC 个体进行筛查策略模拟。结果包括 CRC 发病率、CRC 死亡率和每 1000 名筛查者的预期寿命增加(LYG)(与不筛查相比)。模型使用理论上的完美(100%)和先前报告的(mt-sDNA 为 71%;FIT 为 43%)依从率。

结果

如果完美依从,与 50 岁开始筛查相比,45 岁开始 mt-sDNA 和 FIT 分别预测 LYG 分别增加 22.2 和 23.4;如果实际依从率为 71% mt-sDNA 和 43% FIT,则分别增加 23.9 和 24.4。如果完美依从,与 50 岁开始筛查相比,45 岁开始筛查 mt-sDNA 和 FIT 分别导致 26.1 和 28.6 例 CRC 病例,分别为 22.8 和 25.5 例;如果实际报告现实世界中的依从率分别为 28.5 和 31.2 例 mt-sDNA 和 37.1 和 40.2 例 FIT。mt-sDNA 和 FIT 也观察到类似的 CRC 死亡模式。如果起始年龄为 45 岁,且报告依从率,mt-sDNA 每 1000 名个体可避免 8.6 例 CRC 病例和 3.3 例死亡,优于 FIT。

结论

将起始年龄从 50 岁降低到 45 岁可提高估计的 CRC 筛查结果。纳入报告的依从率后,与每年进行 FIT 筛查相比,每 3 年进行一次 mt-sDNA 筛查可带来更大的收益。

相似文献

1
Lowering the colorectal cancer screening age improves predicted outcomes in a microsimulation model.降低结直肠癌筛查年龄可改善微观模拟模型预测的结果。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2021 Jun;37(6):1005-1010. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2021.1908244. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
2
Estimating the impact of differential adherence on the comparative effectiveness of stool-based colorectal cancer screening using the CRC-AIM microsimulation model.利用 CRC-AIM 微观模拟模型估计基于粪便的结直肠癌筛查比较效果的差异依从性影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 29;15(12):e0244431. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0244431. eCollection 2020.
3
Impact of Patient Adherence to Stool-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening and Colonoscopy Following a Positive Test on Clinical Outcomes.基于粪便的结直肠癌筛查和阳性检测后结肠镜检查中患者依从性对临床结局的影响。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2021 Sep;14(9):845-850. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-21-0075. Epub 2021 May 21.
4
Analysis of the effectiveness of two noninvasive fecal tests used to screen for colorectal cancer in average-risk adults.分析两种用于筛查普通风险成年人结直肠癌的非侵入性粪便检测的有效性。
Public Health. 2020 May;182:70-76. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.01.021. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
5
The cost-effectiveness of non-invasive stool-based colorectal cancer screening offerings from age 45 for a commercial and medicare population.45 岁及以上商业和医疗保险人群非侵入性基于粪便的结直肠癌筛查产品的成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2023 Jan-Dec;26(1):1219-1226. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2260681. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
6
Estimated impact and value of blood-based colorectal cancer screening at varied adherence compared with stool-based screening.与基于粪便的筛查相比,不同依从性的基于血液的结直肠癌筛查的估计影响和价值。
J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):746-753. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2349467. Epub 2024 May 13.
7
Real-world cost-effectiveness of stool-based colorectal cancer screening in a Medicare population.基于粪便的结直肠癌筛查在医疗保险人群中的真实世界成本效益分析。
J Med Econ. 2021 Jan-Dec;24(1):654-664. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2021.1922240.
8
Comparison of Simulated Outcomes Between Stool- and Blood-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Tests.粪便与血液结直肠癌筛查试验模拟结果比较。
Popul Health Manag. 2023 Aug;26(4):239-245. doi: 10.1089/pop.2023.0037. Epub 2023 Jul 19.
9
Impact of the Sessile Serrated Polyp Pathway on Predicted Colorectal Cancer Outcomes.无蒂锯齿状息肉途径对预测的结直肠癌结局的影响。
Gastro Hep Adv. 2022 Feb 3;1(1):55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.gastha.2021.10.007. eCollection 2022.
10
USPSTF colorectal cancer screening guidelines: an extended look at multi-year interval testing.美国预防服务工作组结直肠癌筛查指南:对多年间隔期检测的深入探讨
Am J Manag Care. 2016 Feb 1;22(2):e77-81.

引用本文的文献

1
The Increased Early Onset Colorectal Cancer in South East Scotland Is Indicative of a Wider UK Problem.苏格兰东南部早发性结直肠癌病例增加,表明这是一个影响范围更广的英国问题。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 9;17(12):1913. doi: 10.3390/cancers17121913.
2
When Should Colon Cancer Screening Begin? The Impact of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer and the Reality of an Unscreened Older Population.结肠癌筛查应何时开始?早发性结直肠癌的影响及未接受筛查的老年人群体的现状。
Dig Dis Sci. 2024 Dec 26. doi: 10.1007/s10620-024-08738-6.
3
Impact of the Sessile Serrated Polyp Pathway on Predicted Colorectal Cancer Outcomes.
无蒂锯齿状息肉途径对预测的结直肠癌结局的影响。
Gastro Hep Adv. 2022 Feb 3;1(1):55-62. doi: 10.1016/j.gastha.2021.10.007. eCollection 2022.
4
Methods for improving colorectal cancer annotation efficiency for artificial intelligence-observer training.提高用于人工智能观察者训练的结直肠癌注释效率的方法。
World J Radiol. 2023 Dec 28;15(12):359-369. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v15.i12.359.
5
Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer (CRC) Screening on All-Cause and CRC-Specific Mortality Reduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.结直肠癌(CRC)筛查对降低全因死亡率和CRC特异性死亡率的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 24;15(7):1948. doi: 10.3390/cancers15071948.