Suppr超能文献

可切除胆管癌的辅助治疗:贝叶斯网络分析

Adjuvant Therapy for Resectable Biliary Tract Cancer: A Bayesian Network Analysis.

作者信息

Chen Xiuqiong, Meng Fanqiao, Xiong Hua, Zou Yanmei

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Department of Hematology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 11;11:600027. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.600027. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

Selecting proper postoperative adjuvant therapy is of great importance for prolonging overall survival (OS) of patients with biliary tract cancer (BTC). OS is commonly affected by high rate of postoperative recurrence and metastasis. The present study aimed to identify the optimal adjuvant therapy for BTC patients. A comprehensive search was carried out on Pubmed, Web of science, and Embase databases to acquire articles regarding BTC therapy approaches. Subsequently, the hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were applied to evaluate the efficacy of different adjuvant therapy regimens. The GemTc (GemTc.0.8-2) and R (R.3.6.0) software were employed to perform statistical analyses. Data from 22 articles, including 14,646 patients, were quantitatively analyzed. The results showed that in terms of 5-year OS, gemcitabine (GEM) was considered as the optimal adjuvant therapy for BTC compared with chemoradiotherapy (CRT; HR = 0.59; 95% CI = 0.34-0.97), observation (OB; HR = 0.49; 95% CI = 0.33-0.73), and radiotherapy (RT; HR = 0.40; 95% CI = 0.22-0.71). Additionally, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) exhibited improved efficacy compared with RT (HR = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.29-0.91) and OB (HR = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.43-0.92). When the efficacy of 5-FU was compared with that of GEM, the results showed that 5-FU (HR = 1.29) was more effective than GEM. Furthermore, CRT and RT prolonged positive resection margin (R)-OS (HR = 0.69; 95% CI = 0.49-1.00) and positive lymph node-(N)-OS (HR = 0.22; 95% CI = 0.074-0.66) in BTC patients. In terms of median recurrence-free survival (RFS) and 1-year OS, the differences were not statistically significant among different therapeutic interventions. The present study suggested that GEM could be used as a first-line adjuvant therapy for resected BTC patients. Additionally, CRT could be the optimal treatment approach for R and N patients.

摘要

选择合适的术后辅助治疗对于延长胆道癌(BTC)患者的总生存期(OS)至关重要。OS通常受术后高复发率和转移率的影响。本研究旨在确定BTC患者的最佳辅助治疗方法。对PubMed、科学网和Embase数据库进行了全面检索,以获取有关BTC治疗方法的文章。随后,应用风险比(HR)及其95%置信区间(CI)来评估不同辅助治疗方案的疗效。使用GemTc(GemTc.0.8 - 2)和R(R.3.6.0)软件进行统计分析。对来自22篇文章、共14646例患者的数据进行了定量分析。结果显示,就5年总生存期而言,与放化疗(CRT;HR = 0.59;95% CI = 0.34 - 0.97)、观察(OB;HR = 0.49;95% CI = 0.33 - 0.73)和放疗(RT;HR = 0.40;95% CI = 0.22 - 0.71)相比,吉西他滨(GEM)被认为是BTC的最佳辅助治疗。此外,与放疗(RT;HR = 0.52;95% CI = 0.29 - 0.91)和观察(OB;HR = 0.63;95% CI = 0.43 - 0.92)相比,5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)显示出更好的疗效。当比较5-FU与GEM的疗效时,结果显示5-FU(HR = 1.29)比GEM更有效。此外,放化疗和放疗延长了BTC患者切缘阳性(R)患者的总生存期(HR = 0.69;95% CI = 0.49 - 1.00)和淋巴结阳性(N)患者的总生存期(HR = 0.22;95% CI = 0.074 - 0.66)。就中位无复发生存期(RFS)和1年总生存期而言,不同治疗干预之间的差异无统计学意义。本研究表明,GEM可作为BTC切除患者的一线辅助治疗。此外,放化疗可能是R和N患者的最佳治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b156/7991284/c2fe82a35c7c/fonc-11-600027-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验