Department of Biomedical Engineering, MHeNs School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J Neuroimaging. 2021 Jul;31(4):724-732. doi: 10.1111/jon.12851. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
The optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) is a promising surrogate marker for the detection of raised intracranial pressure (ICP). However, inconsistencies in manual ONSD assessment are thought to affect ONSD and the corresponding ONSD cutoff values for the diagnosis of elevated ICP, hereby hampering the full potential of ONSD. In this study, we developed an image intensity-invariant algorithm to automatically estimate ONSD from B-mode ultrasound images at multiple depths.
The outcomes of the algorithm were validated against manual ONSD measurements by two human experts. Each expert analyzed the images twice (M1 and M2) in unknown order.
The algorithm proved capable of segmenting the ONSD in 39 of 42 images, hereby showing mean differences of -.08 ± .45 and -.05 ± .41 mm compared to averaged ONSD values (M1 + M2/2) of Operator 1 and Operator 2, respectively, whereas the mean difference between the two experts was .03 ± .26 mm. Moreover, differences between algorithm-derived and expert-derived ONSD values were found to be much smaller than the 1 mm difference that is expected between patients with normal and elevated ICP, making it likely that our algorithm can distinguish between these patient groups.
Our algorithm has the potential to improve the accuracy of ONSD as a surrogate marker for elevated ICP because it has no intrinsic variability. However, future research should be performed to validate if the algorithm does indeed result in more accurate noninvasive ICP predictions.
视神经鞘直径(ONSD)是检测颅内压升高(ICP)的一种很有前途的替代标志物。然而,手动 ONSD 评估的不一致性被认为会影响 ONSD 及其相应的 ONSD 截断值,从而影响 ONSD 对 ICP 升高的诊断潜力。在这项研究中,我们开发了一种图像强度不变的算法,可从多个深度的 B 型超声图像自动估计 ONSD。
该算法的结果通过两位人类专家的手动 ONSD 测量进行验证。每位专家以未知的顺序两次(M1 和 M2)分析图像。
该算法能够在 42 张图像中的 39 张中分割 ONSD,与操作员 1 和操作员 2 的平均 ONSD 值(M1+M2/2)相比,分别显示出平均差异为-.08±.45 和-.05±.41mm,而两位专家之间的平均差异为.03±.26mm。此外,算法得出的 ONSD 值与专家得出的 ONSD 值之间的差异明显小于正常 ICP 和升高 ICP 患者之间预计的 1mm 差异,这表明我们的算法很可能能够区分这些患者群体。
我们的算法有可能提高 ONSD 作为升高 ICP 的替代标志物的准确性,因为它没有内在的可变性。然而,应该进行未来的研究来验证该算法是否确实能够实现更准确的非侵入性 ICP 预测。