Lyerly Neurosurgery, Baptist Neurological Institute, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Research Department, Jacksonville University, Jacksonville, FL, USA.
J Neurointerv Surg. 2022 Mar;14(3):242-247. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-017218. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
Patients ≥80-year-old presenting with large-vessel occlusion treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) have worst outcomes than younger individuals. Improved patient selection in this age range is warranted. We investigated the hypoperfusion-intensity-ratio (HIR) and its associations with baseline parameters and clinical outcomes in a cohort ≥80-year-old to assess whether it could an option in improving their selection for EVT.
We performed retrospective analysis of consecutive patients treated with EVT at our center between 2015 and 2019. Inclusion criteria were age ≥80-year-old, any baseline modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and anterior circulation occlusion. Demographic information, baseline characteristics, clinical data, and radiological imaging parameters were collected. HIR was dichotomized into favorable and unfavorable based on median value of the cohort. Good outcome was defined as mRS ≤2 at 90-days.
We included 82 patients. HIR was significantly correlated with baseline ischemic core volume, NIHSS, and time-of-onset to groin puncture. Good outcome was achieved in 18.3% and mortality occurred in 34.1%. In patients with baseline mRS ≤2, the rate of good outcome was significantly higher in favorable vs unfavorable HIR (52.6% vs 20%, P=0.02). In shift-analysis, unfavorable HIR was significantly associated with downshift to mRS ≥3 (P=0.02). Regression analysis found lower baseline mRS (P=0.009), higher ASPECTS (P=0.02), complete recanalization (P=0.04), and lower HIR (P=0.02) to be associated with increased rate of good outcome. Hierarchical regression showed HIR to independently predict good outcome.
In our cohort, HIR was correlated with baseline parameters and predicted clinical outcomes. Future studies should investigate perfusion parameters such as HIR to improve the selection of elderly patients for EVT.
接受血管内血栓切除术(EVT)治疗的 80 岁以上大血管闭塞患者的预后比年轻患者差。在这个年龄段,需要更好的患者选择。我们研究了在一个 80 岁以上的队列中,低灌注-强度比(HIR)与基线参数和临床结果的相关性,以评估其是否可以作为改善 EVT 选择的一个选项。
我们对 2015 年至 2019 年期间在我们中心接受 EVT 治疗的连续患者进行了回顾性分析。纳入标准为年龄≥80 岁,任何基线改良 Rankin 量表(mRS)和前循环闭塞。收集人口统计学信息、基线特征、临床数据和影像学参数。根据队列的中位数将 HIR 分为有利和不利。90 天 mRS≤2 定义为良好预后。
我们纳入了 82 名患者。HIR 与基线缺血核心体积、NIHSS 和发病至股动脉穿刺时间显著相关。18.3%的患者获得良好预后,34.1%的患者死亡。在基线 mRS≤2 的患者中,有利 HIR 与不利 HIR 相比,良好预后的比例明显更高(52.6% vs 20%,P=0.02)。在转移分析中,不利 HIR 与向 mRS≥3 转移显著相关(P=0.02)。回归分析发现较低的基线 mRS(P=0.009)、较高的 ASPECTS(P=0.02)、完全再通(P=0.04)和较低的 HIR(P=0.02)与良好预后的比例增加相关。层次回归显示 HIR 可独立预测良好预后。
在我们的队列中,HIR 与基线参数相关,并预测临床结果。未来的研究应该调查灌注参数,如 HIR,以改善老年患者 EVT 的选择。