• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Safety and Hospital Costs Averted Using a Rapid Outpatient Management Strategy for Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Strokes: The RAVEN Clinic.使用针对短暂性脑缺血发作和轻度中风的快速门诊管理策略避免的安全性和医院成本:RAVEN诊所
Neurohospitalist. 2021 Apr;11(2):107-113. doi: 10.1177/1941874420972236. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
2
Safety and Feasibility of a Rapid Outpatient Management Strategy for Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke: The Rapid Access Vascular Evaluation-Neurology (RAVEN) Approach.急性短暂性脑缺血发作和小卒中快速门诊管理策略的安全性和可行性:快速血管评估-神经病学(RAVEN)方法。
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Oct;74(4):562-571. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.05.025. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
3
Can I Send This Patient with Stroke Home? Strategies Managing Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke in the Emergency Department.我可以让这位中风患者回家吗?急诊科处理短暂性脑缺血发作和轻度中风的策略。
J Emerg Med. 2018 May;54(5):636-644. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.12.015. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
4
Are patients afraid to go home? Disposition preferences after transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke.患者害怕回家吗?短暂性脑缺血发作和小卒中后的处置偏好。
Emerg Med J. 2020 Aug;37(8):486-488. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-209154. Epub 2020 Jan 28.
5
One-Year Risk of Stroke After Transient Ischemic Attack or Minor Stroke in Hunter New England, Australia (INSIST Study).澳大利亚新英格兰猎人地区短暂性脑缺血发作或轻度卒中后一年的卒中风险(INSIST研究)
Front Neurol. 2021 Dec 20;12:791193. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.791193. eCollection 2021.
6
Rapid access point of care clinic for transient ischemic attacks and minor strokes.短暂性脑缺血发作和轻度中风的快速便捷门诊
J Clin Neurosci. 2016 Jan;23:106-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.04.032. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
7
Absolute cardiovascular risk and GP decision making in TIA and minor stroke.短暂性脑缺血发作和轻度卒中的绝对心血管风险与全科医生的决策
Fam Pract. 2014 Dec;31(6):664-9. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmu054. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
8
Results of an outpatient transient ischemic attack evaluation: a 90-day follow-up study.门诊短暂性脑缺血发作评估结果:一项90天随访研究。
J Emerg Med. 2013 May;44(5):970-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.09.145. Epub 2013 Mar 9.
9
Expedited and Comprehensive Management of Low-Risk TIA Patients in the Emergency Department is Safe and Less Costly.急诊科对低危 TIA 患者进行快速全面管理安全且费用更低。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Oct;30(10):106016. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106016. Epub 2021 Jul 27.
10
Rural versus metropolitan comparison of processes of care in the community-based management of TIA and minor stroke in Australia (an analysis from the INSIST study).澳大利亚短暂性脑缺血发作和轻度卒中社区管理中乡村与大都市医疗流程的比较(来自INSIST研究的分析)
Aust J Rural Health. 2023 Apr;31(2):274-284. doi: 10.1111/ajr.12950. Epub 2022 Nov 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-Effectiveness of Increased Use of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After High-Risk Transient Ischemic Attack or Minor Stroke.高危短暂性脑缺血发作或小卒中后增加双联抗血小板治疗的成本效益。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Apr 2;13(7):e032808. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.032808. Epub 2024 Mar 27.
2
Safety and Feasibility of an Emergency Department-to-Outpatient Pathway for Patients With TIA and Nondisabling Stroke.短暂性脑缺血发作和非致残性卒中患者从急诊科到门诊治疗途径的安全性和可行性
Neurol Clin Pract. 2023 Dec;13(6):e200209. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200209. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
3
Transient Ischemic Attack Outpatient Clinic: Past Journey and Future Adventure.短暂性脑缺血发作门诊:过往历程与未来探索
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 5;12(13):4511. doi: 10.3390/jcm12134511.
4
Evaluation of Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke: A Rapid Outpatient Model for the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond.短暂性脑缺血发作和轻度卒中的评估:一种适用于新冠疫情及以后的快速门诊模式
Neurohospitalist. 2022 Jan;12(1):38-47. doi: 10.1177/19418744211000508. Epub 2021 Mar 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Transient Ischemic Attack.短暂性脑缺血发作
N Engl J Med. 2020 May 14;382(20):1933-1941. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1908837.
2
Safety and Feasibility of a Rapid Outpatient Management Strategy for Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke: The Rapid Access Vascular Evaluation-Neurology (RAVEN) Approach.急性短暂性脑缺血发作和小卒中快速门诊管理策略的安全性和可行性:快速血管评估-神经病学(RAVEN)方法。
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Oct;74(4):562-571. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.05.025. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
3
Can I Send This Patient with Stroke Home? Strategies Managing Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke in the Emergency Department.我可以让这位中风患者回家吗?急诊科处理短暂性脑缺血发作和轻度中风的策略。
J Emerg Med. 2018 May;54(5):636-644. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.12.015. Epub 2018 Jan 8.
4
Trends in hospitalizations and cost associated with stroke by age, United States 2003-2012.2003 - 2012年美国按年龄划分的中风住院情况及相关费用趋势
Int J Stroke. 2016 Oct;11(8):874-881. doi: 10.1177/1747493016654490. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
5
Treatment rates for PTSD and depression in recently hospitalized cardiac patients.近期住院心脏病患者创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和抑郁症的治疗率。
J Psychosom Res. 2016 Jul;86:60-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.05.007. Epub 2016 May 21.
6
Association between hospitalization and care after transient ischemic attack or minor stroke.短暂性脑缺血发作或轻度中风后的住院治疗与护理之间的关联。
Neurology. 2016 Apr 26;86(17):1582-9. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002614. Epub 2016 Mar 25.
7
Patient treatment in ED hallways and patient perception of clinician-patient communication.急诊科走廊中的患者治疗及患者对医患沟通的认知
Am J Emerg Med. 2016 Jun;34(6):1163-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.02.074. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
8
Scientific Rationale for the Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria for Intravenous Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.静脉注射阿替普酶用于急性缺血性脑卒中的纳入和排除标准的科学依据:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会医疗保健专业人员的声明。
Stroke. 2016 Feb;47(2):581-641. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000086. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
9
Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.《卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作患者卒中预防指南:美国心脏协会/美国卒中协会医疗保健专业人员指南》。
Stroke. 2014 Jul;45(7):2160-236. doi: 10.1161/STR.0000000000000024. Epub 2014 May 1.
10
TIA clinic: a major advance in management of transient ischemic attacks.
Front Neurol Neurosci. 2014;33:30-40. doi: 10.1159/000351890. Epub 2013 Oct 11.

使用针对短暂性脑缺血发作和轻度中风的快速门诊管理策略避免的安全性和医院成本:RAVEN诊所

Safety and Hospital Costs Averted Using a Rapid Outpatient Management Strategy for Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Strokes: The RAVEN Clinic.

作者信息

Shapiro Steven D, Boehme Amelia K, Chang Bernard P, Miller Eliza C, Willey Joshua, Elkind Mitchell S V

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Neurohospitalist. 2021 Apr;11(2):107-113. doi: 10.1177/1941874420972236. Epub 2020 Nov 5.

DOI:10.1177/1941874420972236
PMID:33791052
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7958688/
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Patients presenting to emergency departments (ED) with transient ischemic attack and minor strokes (TIAMS) are often admitted for evaluation, though experience in other countries have suggested that an expedited outpatient care models may be a safe alternative. We hypothesized that a rapid access clinic for select TIAMS was feasible and would avert hospitalization costs.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included patients presenting to our institution's ED with TIAMS and NIHSS ≤5 in calendar year 2017. We referred low-risk patients with TIAMS to a Rapid Access Vascular Evaluation-Neurology (RAVEN) clinic within 24 hours of ED discharge. We identified admitted patients who met RAVEN criteria at ED presentation. Rates of follow-up to the RAVEN clinic were recorded. Financial data collected included total hospital costs and time spent in the ED, as well hospital length of stay for admitted patients with low-risk TIAMS.

RESULTS

In 2017, 149 patients were referred to RAVEN clinic and 50 patients were admitted. Of the RAVEN patients 99 (94%) appeared as scheduled. None had clinical changes between ED discharge and clinical evaluation. One patient required hospitalization at the RAVEN evaluation. When compared to RAVEN patients, admitted patients had significantly higher $7,719 (SD 354) total hospital costs and were hospitalized for 2 days on average. Overall, the RAVEN strategy averted approximately $764,000 in hospitalization costs and 208 hospital bed-days in accounting year 2017.

CONCLUSIONS

For select patients presenting with TIAMS without disabling deficits, a rapid outpatient evaluation may be feasible while averting significant total hospital costs and preserving inpatient hospital beds.

摘要

研究目的

因短暂性脑缺血发作和轻度卒中(TIAMS)前往急诊科(ED)就诊的患者通常会住院接受评估,不过其他国家的经验表明,快速门诊护理模式可能是一种安全的替代方案。我们推测,为特定TIAMS患者设立的快速通道诊所是可行的,并且可以避免住院费用。

方法

这项回顾性分析纳入了2017年在我们机构急诊科因TIAMS就诊且美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表(NIHSS)评分≤5的患者。我们在急诊科出院后24小时内将低风险TIAMS患者转诊至快速通道血管评估-神经科(RAVEN)诊所。我们确定了在急诊科就诊时符合RAVEN标准的住院患者。记录了到RAVEN诊所的随访率。收集的财务数据包括总住院费用、在急诊科的停留时间,以及低风险TIAMS住院患者的住院时长。

结果

2017年,149名患者被转诊至RAVEN诊所,50名患者住院。在RAVEN诊所的患者中,99名(94%)按计划就诊。从急诊科出院到临床评估期间,无一例有临床变化。1名患者在RAVEN评估时需要住院。与RAVEN诊所的患者相比,住院患者的总住院费用显著更高,为7719美元(标准差354),平均住院2天。总体而言,RAVEN策略在2017财年避免了约76.4万美元的住院费用和208个住院床位日。

结论

对于某些无致残性神经功能缺损的TIAMS患者,快速门诊评估可能是可行的,同时可避免显著的总住院费用并保留住院床位。