Department of Physiotherapy, School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Department of Rehabilitation, Nutrition and Sport, School of Allied Health, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.
Brain Connect. 2021 Nov;11(9):695-716. doi: 10.1089/brain.2020.0872. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
To evaluate the effects of a single session of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on postural balance. The NIBS has been used widely in improving balance. However, the effect of a single session of NIBS on balance in healthy individuals has not been systemically reviewed. A systematic literature review and best evidence synthesis were conducted, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, to determine the effects of different NIBS techniques on balance function in healthy individuals. The methodological quality of included articles was assessed by the risk of bias, and the Downs and Black tool. Data were analyzed by using the best evidence synthesis. Thirty-five articles were included that used the following NIBS techniques: anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS), cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (c-tDCS), continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS), and repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on primary motor cortex (M1), supplementary motor area (SMA), dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), and cerebellum on balance. Strong evidence showed that a-tDCS of M1, SMA improve balance in healthy participants, and the a-tDCS of DLPFC induces improvement only in dual task balance indices. Also, the findings indicate that cerebellar a-tDCS might significantly improve balance, if at least 10 min cerebellar a-tDCS with an intensity of ≥1 mA, over or maximum 1.5 cm below the inion, is used. Strong evidence showed that c-tDCS, cTBS, and rTMS are not effective on the balance. According to the results, the a-tDCS may be a useful technique to improve balance in healthy adults. Impact statement The strong evidence found in this review indicates that single-session, stand-alone application of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on the cerebellum, primary motor cortex (M1), and supplementary motor area can improve balance in healthy individuals. Moreover, strong evidence suggests that cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation has an adverse effect on balance and must be avoided as a technique for the treatment of balance. These results can be used to improve balance in patients with neurological disorders, and healthy older adults with balance dysfunctions.
评价单次非侵入性脑刺激(NIBS)对姿势平衡的影响。NIBS 已广泛用于改善平衡。然而,单次 NIBS 对健康个体平衡的影响尚未进行系统评价。根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南进行了系统文献回顾和最佳证据综合,以确定不同 NIBS 技术对健康个体平衡功能的影响。通过偏倚风险和唐斯和布莱克工具评估纳入文章的方法学质量。使用最佳证据综合分析数据。纳入了 35 篇使用以下 NIBS 技术的文章:经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)阳极刺激、tDCS 阴极刺激、连续 theta 爆发刺激(cTBS)和重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)刺激初级运动皮层(M1)、辅助运动区(SMA)、背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)和小脑对平衡的影响。有强有力的证据表明,M1、SMA 的阳极 tDCS 可改善健康参与者的平衡,而 DLPFC 的阳极 tDCS 仅在双任务平衡指标上引起改善。此外,研究结果表明,如果使用至少 10 分钟强度为≥1 mA、超过或最大 1.5 厘米低于枕骨隆突的小脑阳极 tDCS,则小脑阳极 tDCS 可能显著改善平衡。有强有力的证据表明,阴极 tDCS、cTBS 和 rTMS 对平衡没有效果。根据研究结果,阳极 tDCS 可能是改善健康成年人平衡的有用技术。影响陈述 本综述中发现的强有力证据表明,单次、独立应用阳极 tDCS 于小脑、初级运动皮层(M1)和辅助运动区可改善健康个体的平衡。此外,强有力的证据表明,阴极 tDCS 对平衡有不利影响,必须避免将其作为治疗平衡的技术。这些结果可用于改善神经障碍患者和平衡功能障碍的健康老年人的平衡。