修订版同伴经历问卷受害分度量表中文版的验证。
The Validation of Chinese Version of the Victimization Subscale of the Revised Peer Experiences Questionnaire.
机构信息
Institute of Psychology and Behavior, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China.
Institute of Cognition, Brain and Health, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China.
出版信息
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 13;18(6):2937. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18062937.
In China, researchers have translated and validated several scales to measure victimization behavior. The aim of the present study was to validate the Chinese version of the victimization subscale of the Revised Peer Experiences Questionnaire (RPEQ) among primary school students. Primary school students aged between 8 and 13 years old ( = 1048) were asked to complete the Chinese version of the victimization subscale of the RPEQ and related scales. We examined internal consistency and the factor structure using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Depression, peer relationship, and sleep scales were used to measure construct validity. The CFA results suggested that the four-factor model had a good model fit. The results indicated that internal reliability was good (Cronbach's α = 0.83). Construct validity was mostly supported by scores on the Chinese version of the victimization subscale of the RPEQ that strongly and positively correlated with depression and negatively correlated with peer relationship and sleep quality. The present study indicated that the Chinese version of the victimization subscale of the RPEQ has adequate reliability and validity for measuring bullying problems among Chinese primary school students.
在中国，研究人员已经翻译和验证了几种用于测量受害行为的量表。本研究的目的是在小学生中验证修订后的同伴经历问卷（RPEQ）受害分量表的中文版。要求 8 至 13 岁的小学生（n=1048）完成 RPEQ 受害分量表和相关量表的中文版。我们使用验证性因素分析（CFA）来检验内部一致性和因子结构。使用抑郁、同伴关系和睡眠量表来衡量结构效度。CFA 结果表明，四因素模型具有良好的模型拟合度。结果表明，内部信度良好（Cronbach's α=0.83）。结构效度主要通过 RPEQ 受害分量表的得分得到支持，该得分与抑郁呈强正相关，与同伴关系和睡眠质量呈负相关。本研究表明，RPEQ 受害分量表的中文版具有足够的信度和效度，可用于测量中国小学生的欺凌问题。
Zotero 插件