Scoular Sarah, Huntsberry Ashley, Patel Toral, Wettergreen Sara, Brunner Jason M
Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Pharmacy (Basel). 2021 Mar 5;9(1):52. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy9010052.
In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, pharmacy education has shifted from in-person teaching and assessments to the virtual environment. Many education programs had previously adopted objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) to assess communication abilities in-person with standardized patients (SPs). However, comparative student outcome data between virtual and in-person methods as well as guidance on how to conduct communication-based OSCEs in the virtual environment is lacking. The University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences (SSPPS) describes its methods of conducting two types of communication-based OSCEs (patient counseling and gathering a medical history). Student performance data from the two virtual OSCEs in 2020 was compared to results from two 2019 in-person OSCEs using Mann Whitney U Tests. The 2020 cohort scored significantly higher than the 2019 cohort in all variables (i.e., using effective verbal and non-verbal communication, using patient friendly education, organizing the encounter, demonstrating empathy, establishing trust, professionalism) and in overall score. However, the effect size for these findings indicate the differences between performances are generally small and more likely due to changes in grading patterns due to the pandemic.
鉴于新冠疫情,药学教育已从面对面教学和评估转向虚拟环境。许多教育项目此前采用客观结构化临床考试(OSCEs),通过标准化病人(SPs)来面对面评估沟通能力。然而,缺乏虚拟和面对面方法之间学生成绩的比较数据,以及关于如何在虚拟环境中进行基于沟通的OSCEs的指导。科罗拉多大学斯卡格斯药学院和制药科学学院(SSPPS)介绍了进行两种基于沟通的OSCEs(患者咨询和收集病史)的方法。使用曼-惠特尼U检验,将2020年两次虚拟OSCEs的学生成绩数据与2019年两次面对面OSCEs的结果进行比较。2020年的队列在所有变量(即使用有效的言语和非言语沟通、使用患者友好型教育、组织会诊、表现出同理心、建立信任、专业素养)和总成绩方面的得分显著高于2019年的队列。然而,这些结果的效应大小表明,表现之间的差异通常较小,更可能是由于疫情导致评分模式的变化。