Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Centre, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Rheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Aug;80(8):965-973. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219825. Epub 2021 Apr 2.
To compare outcomes of different treatment schedules from the care in early rheumatoid arthritis (CareRA) trial over 5 years.
Patients with RA completing the 2-year CareRA randomised controlled trial were eligible for the 3-year observational CareRA-plus study. 5-year outcomes after randomisation to initial methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy with glucocorticoid bridging (COBRA-Slim) were compared with MTX step-up without glucocorticoids or conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) combinations with glucocorticoid bridging, per prognostic patient group. Disease activity (Disease Activity Score based on 28 joints calculated with C reactive protein (DAS28-CRP)) and functionality (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)) were compared between treatment arms using longitudinal models; safety and drug use were detailed.
Of 322 eligible patients, 252 (78%) entered CareRA-plus, of which 203 (81%) completed the study. Treatments for high-risk patients resulted in comparable DAS28-CRP (p=0.539) and HAQ scores over 5 years (p=0.374). Low-risk patients starting COBRA-Slim had lower DAS28-CRP (p<0.001) and HAQ scores (p=0.041) than those starting only on MTX. At study completion, 114/203 (56%) patients never had their original DMARD therapy intensified, with comparable rates between all treatments. Safety was comparable between treatments in high-risk patients. In low-risk patients, there were 18 adverse events in 10 COBRA-Slim and 36 in 17 patients treated with initial MTX monotherapy (p=0.048). Over 5 years, 22% of patients initiated biologics, 25% took glucocorticoids for >3 months and 17% for >6 months outside the bridging period.
All intensive treatments with glucocorticoids bridging demonstrated excellent 5 year outcomes. Initiating COBRA-Slim was comparably effective as more complex treatments for high-risk patients with early RA and more effective than initial MTX monotherapy for low-risk patients with limited need for biologics and chronic glucocorticoid use.
比较 CareRA 试验中不同治疗方案在 5 年内的结果。
完成 2 年 CareRA 随机对照试验的 RA 患者有资格参加 3 年的 CareRA-plus 观察性研究。比较初始甲氨蝶呤(MTX)单药联合糖皮质激素桥接(COBRA-Slim)与不联合糖皮质激素的 MTX 逐步升级或联合常规合成改善病情抗风湿药物(DMARD)的治疗方案在随机分组后的 5 年结局,按预后患者组分层。使用纵向模型比较治疗组之间的疾病活动度(基于 C 反应蛋白计算的 28 个关节疾病活动评分(DAS28-CRP))和功能(健康评估问卷(HAQ));详细介绍安全性和药物使用情况。
在 322 名符合条件的患者中,有 252 名(78%)进入了 CareRA-plus,其中 203 名(81%)完成了研究。高风险患者的治疗方案在 5 年内的 DAS28-CRP(p=0.539)和 HAQ 评分(p=0.374)结果相当。起始 COBRA-Slim 的低风险患者的 DAS28-CRP(p<0.001)和 HAQ 评分(p=0.041)低于起始仅接受 MTX 治疗的患者。在研究结束时,203 名患者中有 114 名(56%)从未强化过原有的 DMARD 治疗,所有治疗方案之间的比例相当。在高风险患者中,治疗方法的安全性相当。在低风险患者中,COBRA-Slim 组有 18 例不良事件,而初始 MTX 单药治疗组有 36 例(p=0.048)。5 年内,22%的患者开始使用生物制剂,25%的患者在桥接期外使用糖皮质激素超过 3 个月,17%的患者使用糖皮质激素超过 6 个月。
所有联合糖皮质激素桥接的强化治疗方案在 5 年内均显示出良好的疗效。对于高风险的早期 RA 患者,起始 COBRA-Slim 与更复杂的治疗方案效果相当,对于低风险患者,起始 COBRA-Slim 比起始 MTX 单药治疗更有效,因为低风险患者对生物制剂和慢性糖皮质激素的需求有限。