Suppr超能文献

在 CareRA 试验中,对于类风湿关节炎患者,甲氨蝶呤诱导治疗联合或不联合其他 csDMARDs 和临时糖皮质激素的 5 年达标治疗结果。

Five-year treat-to-target outcomes after methotrexate induction therapy with or without other csDMARDs and temporary glucocorticoids for rheumatoid arthritis in the CareRA trial.

机构信息

Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Centre, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Rheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Ann Rheum Dis. 2021 Aug;80(8):965-973. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219825. Epub 2021 Apr 2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare outcomes of different treatment schedules from the care in early rheumatoid arthritis (CareRA) trial over 5 years.

METHODS

Patients with RA completing the 2-year CareRA randomised controlled trial were eligible for the 3-year observational CareRA-plus study. 5-year outcomes after randomisation to initial methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy with glucocorticoid bridging (COBRA-Slim) were compared with MTX step-up without glucocorticoids or conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) combinations with glucocorticoid bridging, per prognostic patient group. Disease activity (Disease Activity Score based on 28 joints calculated with C reactive protein (DAS28-CRP)) and functionality (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ)) were compared between treatment arms using longitudinal models; safety and drug use were detailed.

RESULTS

Of 322 eligible patients, 252 (78%) entered CareRA-plus, of which 203 (81%) completed the study. Treatments for high-risk patients resulted in comparable DAS28-CRP (p=0.539) and HAQ scores over 5 years (p=0.374). Low-risk patients starting COBRA-Slim had lower DAS28-CRP (p<0.001) and HAQ scores (p=0.041) than those starting only on MTX. At study completion, 114/203 (56%) patients never had their original DMARD therapy intensified, with comparable rates between all treatments. Safety was comparable between treatments in high-risk patients. In low-risk patients, there were 18 adverse events in 10 COBRA-Slim and 36 in 17 patients treated with initial MTX monotherapy (p=0.048). Over 5 years, 22% of patients initiated biologics, 25% took glucocorticoids for >3 months and 17% for >6 months outside the bridging period.

CONCLUSIONS

All intensive treatments with glucocorticoids bridging demonstrated excellent 5 year outcomes. Initiating COBRA-Slim was comparably effective as more complex treatments for high-risk patients with early RA and more effective than initial MTX monotherapy for low-risk patients with limited need for biologics and chronic glucocorticoid use.

摘要

目的

比较 CareRA 试验中不同治疗方案在 5 年内的结果。

方法

完成 2 年 CareRA 随机对照试验的 RA 患者有资格参加 3 年的 CareRA-plus 观察性研究。比较初始甲氨蝶呤(MTX)单药联合糖皮质激素桥接(COBRA-Slim)与不联合糖皮质激素的 MTX 逐步升级或联合常规合成改善病情抗风湿药物(DMARD)的治疗方案在随机分组后的 5 年结局,按预后患者组分层。使用纵向模型比较治疗组之间的疾病活动度(基于 C 反应蛋白计算的 28 个关节疾病活动评分(DAS28-CRP))和功能(健康评估问卷(HAQ));详细介绍安全性和药物使用情况。

结果

在 322 名符合条件的患者中,有 252 名(78%)进入了 CareRA-plus,其中 203 名(81%)完成了研究。高风险患者的治疗方案在 5 年内的 DAS28-CRP(p=0.539)和 HAQ 评分(p=0.374)结果相当。起始 COBRA-Slim 的低风险患者的 DAS28-CRP(p<0.001)和 HAQ 评分(p=0.041)低于起始仅接受 MTX 治疗的患者。在研究结束时,203 名患者中有 114 名(56%)从未强化过原有的 DMARD 治疗,所有治疗方案之间的比例相当。在高风险患者中,治疗方法的安全性相当。在低风险患者中,COBRA-Slim 组有 18 例不良事件,而初始 MTX 单药治疗组有 36 例(p=0.048)。5 年内,22%的患者开始使用生物制剂,25%的患者在桥接期外使用糖皮质激素超过 3 个月,17%的患者使用糖皮质激素超过 6 个月。

结论

所有联合糖皮质激素桥接的强化治疗方案在 5 年内均显示出良好的疗效。对于高风险的早期 RA 患者,起始 COBRA-Slim 与更复杂的治疗方案效果相当,对于低风险患者,起始 COBRA-Slim 比起始 MTX 单药治疗更有效,因为低风险患者对生物制剂和慢性糖皮质激素的需求有限。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验