Division of Epidemiology & Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Division of Epidemiology & Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Appetite. 2021 Aug 1;163:105238. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105238. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits are rapidly depleted after distribution. This phenomenon, known as the benefit cycle, is associated with poor nutrition and health outcomes. Proposed interventions targeting the benefit cycle often focus on impulsive decision-making. However, it remains unclear whether shopper impulsivity is associated with food purchasing behavior. Using data from a prospective trial, we evaluate whether shopper impulsivity is associated with food purchasing behavior before and after households receive nutrition assistance. In this study, 249 low-income households in the Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota, metropolitan area received monthly benefits for three months. Overall impulsivity and impulsivity subtraits of the primary shopper was assessed using the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale-11. Both total food expenditures and expenditures for two specific categories (fruits and vegetables, and foods high in added sugar) were evaluated. Generalized estimating equations were used to model household expenditures as a function of week since benefit distribution, impulsivity, and their interaction. Results showed that during the benefit period, food expenditures were cyclical and patterned by impulsivity. Shoppers with greater overall impulsivity spent $40.62 more in week 1 (p < 0.001). While more impulsive shoppers spent more on foods high in added sugar throughout the month (p < 0.05 for all weeks), no patterns were observed for fruits and vegetables. These findings suggest that greater impulsivity exacerbates cyclical food purchasing behavior. The impact of shopper impulsivity is especially notable for expenditures on foods high in added sugar. SNAP educational interventions to mitigate the benefit cycle may be strengthened by focusing on more impulsive shoppers and on strategies to reduce impulsive purchases of foods high in added sugar.
补充营养援助计划 (SNAP) 的福利在分发后迅速耗尽。这种现象称为福利循环,与营养和健康状况不佳有关。针对福利循环提出的干预措施通常侧重于冲动决策。然而,购物冲动是否与食品购买行为有关仍不清楚。利用前瞻性试验的数据,我们评估家庭获得营养援助前后购物者的冲动是否与食品购买行为有关。在这项研究中,明尼苏达州明尼阿波利斯-圣保罗都会区的 249 户低收入家庭在三个月内每月获得福利。使用 Barratt 冲动量表-11 评估主要购物者的整体冲动和冲动亚特质。评估了总食品支出以及两个特定类别(水果和蔬菜以及添加糖含量高的食品)的支出。广义估计方程用于模拟家庭支出作为福利分配后周数、冲动和它们之间相互作用的函数。结果表明,在福利期内,食品支出呈周期性波动,受冲动影响。整体冲动性较高的购物者在第 1 周多花费了 40.62 美元(p<0.001)。虽然冲动型购物者在整个月内花费更多的钱购买添加糖含量高的食品(所有周都<0.05),但水果和蔬菜没有观察到模式。这些发现表明,更高的冲动性会加剧周期性的食品购买行为。购物者冲动性的影响对于添加糖含量高的食品支出尤为明显。为了减轻福利循环的影响,SNAP 教育干预措施可能会通过关注更冲动的购物者和减少冲动购买添加糖含量高的食品的策略来加强。