Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham Veterans Affairs Health Care System.
Departments of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.
Med Care. 2021 May 1;59(5):410-417. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001526.
Population segmentation has been recognized as a foundational step to help tailor interventions. Prior studies have predominantly identified subgroups based on diagnoses. In this study, we identify clinically coherent subgroups using social determinants of health (SDH) measures collected from Veterans at high risk of hospitalization or death.
SDH measures were obtained for 4684 Veterans at high risk of hospitalization through mail survey. Eleven self-report measures known to impact hospitalization and amenable to intervention were chosen a priori by the study team to identify subgroups through latent class analysis. Associations between subgroups and demographic and comorbidity characteristics were calculated through multinomial logistic regression. Odds of 180-day hospitalization were compared across subgroups through logistic regression.
Five subgroups of high-risk patients emerged-those with: minimal SDH vulnerabilities (8% hospitalized), poor/fair health with few SDH vulnerabilities (12% hospitalized), social isolation (10% hospitalized), multiple SDH vulnerabilities (12% hospitalized), and multiple SDH vulnerabilities without food or medication insecurity (10% hospitalized). In logistic regression, the "multiple SDH vulnerabilities" subgroup had greater odds of 180-day hospitalization than did the "minimal SDH vulnerabilities" reference subgroup (odds ratio: 1.53, 95% confidence interval: 1.09-2.14).
Self-reported SDH measures can identify meaningful subgroups that may be used to offer tailored interventions to reduce their risk of hospitalization and other adverse events.
人群细分已被认为是帮助调整干预措施的基础步骤。先前的研究主要基于诊断来确定亚组。在这项研究中,我们使用从有住院或死亡高风险的退伍军人那里收集的健康社会决定因素 (SDH) 测量值来确定具有临床一致性的亚组。
通过邮件调查获得了 4684 名有住院高风险的退伍军人的 SDH 测量值。研究小组预先选择了 11 项已知会影响住院和可干预的自我报告测量值,通过潜在类别分析来确定亚组。通过多项逻辑回归计算亚组与人口统计学和合并症特征之间的关联。通过逻辑回归比较亚组之间 180 天住院的可能性。
出现了五类高风险患者亚组 - 那些具有:最小 SDH 脆弱性(8%住院)、健康状况不佳/一般且 SDH 脆弱性很少(12%住院)、社会孤立(10%住院)、多个 SDH 脆弱性(12%住院)和多个 SDH 脆弱性但没有食物或药物不安全(10%住院)。在逻辑回归中,“多个 SDH 脆弱性”亚组比“最小 SDH 脆弱性”参考亚组的 180 天住院可能性更高(优势比:1.53,95%置信区间:1.09-2.14)。
自我报告的 SDH 测量值可以识别有意义的亚组,这些亚组可用于提供量身定制的干预措施,以降低他们住院和其他不良事件的风险。