Department of Medicine, Kangwon National University Hospital, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, South Korea.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022 May 25;37(6):1088-1098. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfab151.
The treatment blood pressure (BP) target in chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains unclear, and whether the benefit of intensive BP-lowering is comparable between CKD and non-CKD patients is debated.
Using the Korean National Health Information Database, 359 492 CKD patients who had received antihypertensives regularly were identified from 12.1 million participants of nationwide health screening. The composite risk of major cardiovascular events, kidney failure and all-cause mortality was assessed according to time-averaged, on-treatment systolic BP.
Over a 9-year follow-up, the composite outcome was noted in 18.4% of 239 700 participants with eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 18.9% of 155 004 with dipstick albuminuria. The thresholds of systolic BP, above which the composite risk increased significantly, in the reduced eGFR and the proteinuric population were 135 mmHg and 125 mmHg, respectively. For all-cause mortality, the respective thresholds were 145 mmHg and 135 mmHg. When comparing the composite risk between propensity score-matched groups, the hazard ratios of on-treatment BP of systolic 135-144 mmHg (reference, 115-124 mmHg) in the reduced eGFR and non-CKD pairs were 1.18 and 0.98, respectively (P = 0.13 for interaction), and those in the proteinuria and non-CKD pairs were 1.30 and 1.01, respectively (P = 0.003 for interaction).
The findings support the recommendation that, based on office BP, the systolic target in CKD with proteinuria is ≤130 mmHg, and the target in CKD with no proteinuria is ≤140 mmHg. The benefit of intensive BP-lowering may be greater in CKD patients, particularly those with proteinuria, than in their non-CKD counterparts.
慢性肾脏病(CKD)的治疗血压(BP)目标仍不清楚,并且关于强化降压的益处是否在 CKD 患者和非 CKD 患者之间具有可比性存在争议。
使用韩国国家健康信息数据库,从全国健康筛查的 1210 万参与者中确定了 359492 名定期接受抗高血压药物治疗的 CKD 患者。根据治疗期间的平均收缩压评估主要心血管事件、肾衰竭和全因死亡率的复合风险。
在 9 年的随访期间,在 eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 的 239700 名参与者和尿蛋白阳性的 155004 名参与者中,分别有 18.4%和 18.9%发生了复合结局。在 eGFR 降低和蛋白尿人群中,收缩压显著增加复合风险的阈值分别为 135mmHg 和 125mmHg。对于全因死亡率,相应的阈值分别为 145mmHg 和 135mmHg。在比较倾向评分匹配组之间的复合风险时,在 eGFR 降低和非 CKD 配对中,治疗收缩压 135-144mmHg(参考,115-124mmHg)的危险比分别为 1.18 和 0.98(P=0.13 用于交互作用),在蛋白尿和非 CKD 配对中,危险比分别为 1.30 和 1.01(P=0.003 用于交互作用)。
这些发现支持以下建议:根据诊室 BP,蛋白尿的 CKD 患者的收缩压目标应≤130mmHg,无蛋白尿的 CKD 患者的收缩压目标应≤140mmHg。与非 CKD 患者相比,强化降压的益处可能在 CKD 患者,特别是蛋白尿患者中更大。