Extensile approach versus minimally invasive technique in management of calcaneus fractures.

BACKGROUND

Calcaneus fracture is one of the important fractures in orthopedic surgery. Here we aimed to investigate and compare the extensile approach and minimally invasive technique in patients with calcaneus fractures.

METHODS

This is a randomized clinical trial that was performed in 2019 in Kashani and Alzahra hospitals in Isfahan, Iran. The study population consisted of 30 patients with intraarticular calcaneus fractures. Thirty patients were divided into two groups. In the first group, surgery was performed using the minimally invasive technique and in the second group, the extensile approach was performed. Patients were followed for 12 months. Data regarding the duration of surgery, Boehler and Gisan angles, quality of joint reduction, subtalar joint movement, the incidence of soft-tissue complications and pain of the patients were measured and compare between two groups.

RESULTS

A total number of 30 patients entered the study and were divided into two groups each containing 15 patients. The duration of operation in the extensile approach group was significantly higher than the minimally invasive group (P = 0.03). The severity of pain and mean Boehler angle were significantly higher in the minimally invasive group than in the extensile approach group (P = 0.001 and P = 0.002 respectively). The quality of reduction was also significantly better in the extensile approach group than minimally invasive (P = 0.01) but the extensile approach group had more soft tissue complications than the minimally invasive group (P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Extensile approach was associated with lower pain, lower Boehler angle and better quality of reduction compared to minimally invasive technique but also higher operation duration and surgical site complications. We suggest that the extensile approach should be used in patients with calcaneus fractures with attention to possible complications.