Suppr超能文献

撒哈拉以南非洲国家医疗保险政策制定的框架政策分析。

A framework policy analysis of national health insurance policymaking in sub-Saharan Africa.

机构信息

Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Hans Rosling Center, Global Health, UW Box #351620, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Hans Rosling Center, 3980 15th Ave NE, Fourth Floor Box 351621, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 2021 Sep 9;36(8):1246-1256. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa160.

Abstract

National health insurance (NHI) is a financing mechanism established by a national government with the goal of covering all or almost all of its citizens. A number of low- and middle-income countries have established NHIs as part of a strategy to progress towards universal health coverage. The establishment of an NHI presents a potentially significant shift in national health sector governance, but little is available in the literature regarding how policymaking authority and health governance is shared between NHIs and ministries of health (MOHs). To answer this question, we conducted a descriptive, qualitative comparative analysis of policies, including legislation, guidelines and webpages, from four sub-Saharan African countries that have established or are in the process of establishing an NHI scheme as of 2019 (Ghana, Kenya, Zambia and South Africa). We developed a novel conceptual framework comprising 16 NHI policy domains and conducted a deductive review of relevant policies. We then extracted and indexed policy elements according to this framework to facilitate comparative analysis. We found substantial variation across countries in the types of policies developed and the decision-making authority around those policies. MOHs in all four countries retained at least some decision-making power over the NHIs through regulations and appointment of board members. However, NHIs were often delegated policymaking authority in key areas including financing mechanisms, provider payments, member payments, benefit schemes, accreditation and relationships with private health insurance schemes. The results of this analysis illustrate many aspects of health regulatory power and oversight that will need to be defined as part of establishing NHIs. The approaches from these four countries and the conceptual framework presented in this manuscript may be helpful for other countries in evaluating differing approaches to shared health governance between NHIs and MOHs.

摘要

国家健康保险(NHI)是由国家政府建立的一种融资机制,旨在覆盖其全部或几乎全部公民。一些中低收入国家已经建立了 NHIs,作为迈向全民健康覆盖战略的一部分。建立 NHI 可能会对国家卫生部门治理带来重大变革,但关于 NHIs 和卫生部之间如何共享决策权力和卫生治理的文献却很少。为了回答这个问题,我们对截至 2019 年已建立或正在建立 NHI 计划的四个撒哈拉以南非洲国家(加纳、肯尼亚、赞比亚和南非)的政策(包括立法、准则和网页)进行了描述性、定性比较分析。我们制定了一个包含 16 个 NHI 政策领域的新概念框架,并对相关政策进行了演绎审查。然后,我们根据该框架提取和索引政策要素,以促进比较分析。我们发现,各国在制定政策的类型和这些政策的决策权力方面存在很大差异。在所有四个国家中,卫生部至少通过法规和任命董事会成员保留了对 NHIs 的一些决策权。然而,NHIs 通常被赋予了在关键领域制定政策的权力,包括融资机制、提供者支付、成员支付、福利计划、认证以及与私营医疗保险计划的关系。这项分析的结果说明了在建立 NHIs 时需要定义的许多卫生监管权力和监督方面。这四个国家的方法和本文提出的概念框架可能有助于其他国家评估 NHIs 和卫生部之间共享卫生治理的不同方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验