Aoyama Daisetsu, Mukai Moe, Kaseno Kenichi, Tsuji Toshihiko, Sakakibara Keiichi, Hasegawa Kanae, Nodera Minoru, Miyazaki Shinsuke, Uzui Hiroyasu, Tada Hiroshi
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Fukui, Japan.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Japanese Red Cross Fukui Hospital, Japan.
J Cardiol Cases. 2020 Nov 21;23(4):158-162. doi: 10.1016/j.jccase.2020.11.003. eCollection 2021 Apr.
Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM), defined as left ventricular dysfunction, occurs in the setting of chronic, high burden right ventricular pacing. We describe an unusual case of PICM. A 64-year-old man underwent a medical check-up and was diagnosed with complete atrioventricular block (AVB) with regular and slow ventricular contractions at 38 beats/min (bpm). The patient underwent a pacemaker implantation with a dual-chamber pacing (DDD) pacemaker. This patient had no symptoms or signs of PICM during complete AVB or the period after undergoing dual-chamber pacing. However, PICM developed within a short time after the onset of atrial flutter (AFL). During AFL, the automatic mode switch of the DDD pacemaker to the DDIR mode worked normally, and the ventricles were paced with a stable and regular rate (60 bpm). Despite the administration of ß-blockers and diuretics, his symptoms and status did not improve. After the elimination of the AFL and restoration of AV synchrony with a DDD mode by catheter ablation, the deteriorated condition rapidly improved. In this patient, the coexistence of the loss of AV synchrony and high burden RV pacing during AFL might have caused this unusual PICM. Learning objective: Even when patients have no symptoms or signs of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) during complete atrioventricular block or the period after undergoing dual-chamber pacing, automatic mode-switching to the DDI mode during atrial tachyarrhythmias could rapidly cause PICM. PICM could occur with a much more rapid time course than the historical model of PICM where cardiomyopathy may take several years to develop. Much attention should be paid during the follow-up to patients receiving DDD pacemakers to avoid any unusual PICM as in this case.
起搏诱导性心肌病(PICM)定义为左心室功能障碍,发生于慢性、高负荷右心室起搏的情况下。我们描述了一例不寻常的PICM病例。一名64岁男性接受体检,被诊断为完全性房室传导阻滞(AVB),心室规律缓慢收缩,心率为38次/分钟(bpm)。该患者接受了双腔起搏(DDD)起搏器植入术。在完全性AVB期间以及接受双腔起搏后的一段时间内,该患者没有PICM的症状或体征。然而,在心房扑动(AFL)发作后短时间内发生了PICM。在AFL期间,DDD起搏器的自动模式切换到DDIR模式工作正常,心室以稳定且规律的频率(60 bpm)起搏。尽管使用了β受体阻滞剂和利尿剂,他的症状和状况并未改善。通过导管消融消除AFL并恢复DDD模式的房室同步后,病情迅速改善。在该患者中,AFL期间房室同步丧失和高负荷右心室起搏并存可能导致了这种不寻常的PICM。学习目标:即使患者在完全性房室传导阻滞期间或接受双腔起搏后的一段时间内没有起搏诱导性心肌病(PICM)的症状或体征,房性快速心律失常期间自动模式切换到DDI模式也可能迅速导致PICM。PICM的发生时间进程可能比PICM的传统模式快得多,在传统模式中,心肌病可能需要数年时间才会发展。对于接受DDD起搏器的患者,随访期间应给予高度关注,以避免出现本例中这种不寻常的PICM。