Sethi Sujata, Srivastava Vivek, Verma Piyush
Department of Psychiatry, Pt. B.D. Sharma PGIMS, Rohtak, Haryana, India.
Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2021 Jan-Mar;11(1):27-31. doi: 10.4103/ijabmr.IJABMR_305_20. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
Introduction of competency-based medical education in India has necessitated a diversion from traditional methods of teaching and assessment.
The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and acceptability of mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) as a tool for formative assessment of postgraduates in psychiatry at our institute.
It was a prospective, quasi-experimental study carried out in the Department of Psychiatry, PGIMS, Rohtak (India).
After obtaining written informed consent, trainees (18) were sensitized and faculty members (5) were trained to use mini-CEX and regarding the feedback process with the help of workshops.
Data collected were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Mean differences between the sessions were assessed using a paired sample -test. < 0.05 was considered as level of significance.
Statistically significant difference was found between session 1 and session 6 for counseling skills but not for three sessions of diagnostic skills. Mini-CEX was accepted as a better learning method by 61% of the postgraduates, 36% felt that it improved their clinical skills, 64% reported a boost in their confidence, and 89% looked forward to these encounters. Majority of the postgraduates and faculty members suggested that the mini-CEX should be regularly used in academic settings and should be introduced early in the training.
Mini-CEX is a feasible formative assessment tool for postgraduates in psychiatry and an effective method of learning by the postgraduates, inducing a significant improvement in the counseling skills of students. Teaching faculty also accepted mini-CEX as an effective method of formative assessment.
印度引入基于能力的医学教育使得教学和评估方法必须从传统方式转向。
本研究旨在评估迷你临床评估练习(mini-CEX)作为我院精神病学研究生形成性评估工具的可行性和可接受性。
这是一项在印度罗塔克PGIMS精神病学系进行的前瞻性准实验研究。
在获得书面知情同意后,对18名学员进行了培训使其熟悉,对5名教员进行了培训,使其学会使用mini-CEX并掌握反馈流程,培训借助了研讨会。
收集的数据采用描述性统计进行分析。各阶段之间的平均差异采用配对样本检验进行评估。P<0.05被视为具有统计学意义。
在咨询技能方面,第1阶段和第6阶段之间存在统计学显著差异,但诊断技能的三个阶段不存在差异。61%的研究生认为mini-CEX是一种更好的学习方法,36%的人觉得它提高了他们的临床技能,64%的人表示信心增强,89%的人期待这些评估。大多数研究生和教员建议应在学术环境中定期使用mini-CEX,并应在培训早期引入。
Mini-CEX是一种适用于精神病学研究生的可行的形成性评估工具,也是研究生有效的学习方法,能使学生的咨询技能得到显著提高。教师也认可mini-CEX是一种有效的形成性评估方法。