Hodgkinson Luqman Mushila, Wu Tiffany Tingshuen, Fiorentino David Franklin
Department of Dermatology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Redwood City, CA, USA.
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Mar;9(5):433. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-5175.
The past 15 years has seen significant advances in the characterization of myositis-specific autoantibodies (MSAs) and their associated phenotypes in patients with dermatomyositis (DM). As more careful studies are performed, it is clear that unique combinations of clinical and pathological phenotypes are associated with each MSA, despite the fact that there is considerable heterogeneity within antibody classes as well as overlap across the groups. Because risk for interstitial lung disease (ILD), internal malignancy, adverse disease trajectory, and, potentially response to therapy differ by DM MSA group, a deeper understanding of MSAs and validation and standardization of assays used for detection are critical for optimizing diagnosis and treatment. Like any test, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of assays for various MSAs is not perfect. Currently tests for MSAs are helpful at minimum for a clinician to assess relative risk or contribute to diagnosis and perhaps counsel the appropriate patient about what to expect. With international standardization and larger studies it is likely that more antibody tests will make their way into formal schemata for diagnosis and actionable risk assessment in DM. In this review, we summarize key considerations for interpreting the clinical and pathologic associations with MSA in DM and identify critical gaps in knowledge and practice that will maximize their clinical utility and utility for understanding disease pathogenesis.
在过去15年里,皮肌炎(DM)患者的肌炎特异性自身抗体(MSA)及其相关表型的特征有了显著进展。随着更细致的研究开展,很明显,尽管抗体类别内部存在相当大的异质性,且各抗体组之间存在重叠,但临床和病理表型的独特组合与每种MSA相关。由于间质性肺疾病(ILD)、内部恶性肿瘤、不良疾病轨迹以及潜在的治疗反应风险因DM MSA组而异,深入了解MSA以及用于检测的检测方法的验证和标准化对于优化诊断和治疗至关重要。与任何检测一样,各种MSA检测方法的诊断敏感性和特异性并不完美。目前,MSA检测至少有助于临床医生评估相对风险、辅助诊断,或许还能就预期情况向合适的患者提供咨询。随着国际标准化和更大规模研究的开展,可能会有更多抗体检测方法纳入DM的正式诊断和可操作风险评估方案。在本综述中,我们总结了DM中解释与MSA临床和病理关联的关键考虑因素,并确定了知识和实践中的关键差距,这些差距将最大限度地提高其临床效用以及用于理解疾病发病机制的效用。