Sharma Megha, Malhotra Bharti, Khandelwal Shreya
Department of Microbiology, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302004, India.
Department of Microbiology, SMS Medical College, Jaipur, Rajasthan, 302004, India.
Indian J Med Microbiol. 2021 Jul;39(3):306-310. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmmb.2021.03.015. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
-Incidence of Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) has been increasing in past few years. Treatment of NTM differs from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. For proper treatment, it's important to carry out Drug Susceptibility Testing of NTM. Method of DST for NTM is different from MTB and is not available in most laboratories.
-We performed DST on 122 isolates of NTM. Amikacin, Ciprofloxacin, Trimethoprim, Doxycycline, Moxifloxacin, Clarithromycin, Minocycline and Cefoxitin were used for Rapid Growing Mycobacteria (RGM) and Rifampicin, Clarithromycin, Ethambutol, Isoniazid and Moxifloxacin for Slow Growing Mycobacteria (SGM). M. avium Complex (MAC) was tested against Clarithromycin. Minimum inhibitor concentration was calculated as recommended by standard Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and Resazurin Microtitre Assay (REMA).
-Most of Rapid Growing Mycobacteria were sensitive to Amikacin (76.1%) and Moxifloxacin (46.47%) while Slow Growing Mycobacteria showed only 33.3% sensitivity to Rifampicin and Moxifloxacin and 42% to Clarithromycin. M. avium-intracellulare complex showed 45-50% sensitivity to Clarithromycin. Overall, 98% concordance (Kappa = 0.98; almost perfect; 95% CI = 0.966 to 0.996) was seen between standard and REMA method of DST of NTM.
-Rapid growers showed good sensitivity to Amikacin and Moxifloxacin, while only one third SGM showed sensitivity to Rifampicin, Moxifloxacin and Clarithromycin. For proper management of NTM of eastern Rajasthan its important to know the DST profile in our area to initiate empirical therapy till the results of specific patient are available. REMA was found to give excellent concordance with standard method.
在过去几年中,非结核分枝杆菌(NTM)的发病率一直在上升。NTM的治疗与结核分枝杆菌不同。为了进行恰当的治疗,对NTM进行药敏试验很重要。NTM的药敏试验方法与结核分枝杆菌不同,且在大多数实验室中无法进行。
我们对122株NTM分离株进行了药敏试验。阿米卡星、环丙沙星、甲氧苄啶、多西环素、莫西沙星、克拉霉素、米诺环素和头孢西丁用于快速生长分枝杆菌(RGM),利福平、克拉霉素、乙胺丁醇、异烟肼和莫西沙星用于缓慢生长分枝杆菌(SGM)。鸟分枝杆菌复合群(MAC)针对克拉霉素进行检测。按照标准临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)及刃天青微量滴定法(REMA)的建议计算最低抑菌浓度。
大多数快速生长分枝杆菌对阿米卡星(76.1%)和莫西沙星(46.47%)敏感,而缓慢生长分枝杆菌对利福平和莫西沙星的敏感性仅为33.3%,对克拉霉素的敏感性为42%。鸟分枝杆菌-胞内分枝杆菌复合群对克拉霉素的敏感性为45%-50%。总体而言,NTM药敏试验的标准方法与REMA方法之间的一致性为98%(Kappa = 0.98;几乎完美;95%置信区间 = 0.966至0.996)。
快速生长菌对阿米卡星和莫西沙星表现出良好的敏感性,而只有三分之一的缓慢生长菌对利福平、莫西沙星和克拉霉素敏感。为了对拉贾斯坦邦东部的NTM进行恰当管理,了解我们地区的药敏试验情况很重要,以便在获得特定患者的结果之前启动经验性治疗。发现REMA与标准方法具有极好的一致性。