• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用 MRI、Tinel 试验和菱形肌肌电图预测适合移植的健康 C5 脊神经根残端:对 295 例连续臂丛神经手术的回顾性研究。

Predicting Healthy C5 Spinal Nerve Stumps Eligible for Grafting with MRI, Tinel Test, and Rhomboid Electromyography: A Retrospective Study of 295 Consecutive Brachial Plexus Surgeries.

机构信息

From the Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention (Y.J.Y., Y.M.W.) and Center for Big Data Analytics and Statistics (J.L.H.), Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC; and Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Taipei Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC (K.M.Y., I.H.S., C.M.C., J.H.T.).

出版信息

Radiology. 2021 Jul;300(1):141-151. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021202817. Epub 2021 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1148/radiol.2021202817
PMID:33847517
Abstract

Background MRI, Tinel test, and rhomboid electromyography (EMG) can be used to predict whether C5 spinal nerve stumps are healthy and eligible for grafting in acute adult brachial plexus injuries, but their comparative diagnostic efficacies have not been evaluated. Purpose To compare diagnostic performances of MRI, Tinel test, and rhomboid EMG in predicting healthy C5 spinal nerve stumps that are eligible for grafting. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included consecutive adult patients with acute brachial plexus injury who underwent microreconstructions between January 2008 and December 2018. Healthy C5 spinal nerve stumps eligible for grafting with preceding normal intradural nerve rootlets were diagnosed by an experienced neuroradiologist using an avulsion severity score system based on fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition or FIESTA neurography, which separates intradural nerve rootlets into normal, partial mild, severe, and complete avulsions. Tinel test and rhomboid EMG results were assessed by an experienced nerve surgeon and neurologist, respectively. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the three tests were compared using microdissection as the reference standard. < .05 was considered to indicate a significant difference. Results A total of 251 patients (mean age, 31 years ± 13 [standard deviation]; 217 men) with brachial plexus injuries who had -undergone MRI ( = 251), Tinel test ( = 235), rhomboid EMG ( = 181) and MRI, Tinel test, and EMG ( = 172) were -included. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, respectively, in predicting healthy C5 spinal nerve stumps eligible for grafting were 93% (233 of 251), 84% (58 of 69), and 96% (175 of 182) for MRI; 59% (139 of 235), 56% (37 of 66), and 60% (102 of 169) for Tinel test; and 39% (71 of 181), 85% (43 of 50), and 21% (28 of 131) for rhomboid EMG. MRI (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC], 0.90; < .001) -outperformed MRI and Tinel test (AUC, 0.74), Tinel test (AUC, 0.59), and rhomboid EMG (AUC, 0.53). Conclusion MRI performed best in the prediction of healthy graftable C5 spinal nerve stumps in acute adult brachial plexus injuries. © RSNA, 2021 .

摘要

背景 MRI、Tinel 试验和菱形肌肌电图(EMG)可用于预测急性成人臂丛神经损伤中 C5 脊神经根残端是否健康且适合移植,但尚未评估它们的比较诊断效能。目的 比较 MRI、Tinel 试验和菱形肌 EMG 预测健康、适合移植的 C5 脊神经根残端的诊断性能。材料与方法 本回顾性研究纳入了 2008 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间连续接受急性臂丛神经损伤显微重建的成年患者。有经验的神经放射科医生使用基于快速成像稳态采集或 FIESTA 神经成像的撕脱严重程度评分系统,将先前正常的硬脊神经根分为正常、部分轻度、严重和完全撕脱,诊断出有资格进行移植的健康 C5 脊神经根残端。Tinel 试验和菱形肌 EMG 结果分别由有经验的神经外科医生和神经科医生评估。使用显微解剖作为参考标准,比较三种检测方法的准确性、敏感性和特异性。<.05 表示差异有统计学意义。结果 共纳入 251 例(平均年龄 31 岁±13[标准差];217 例男性)臂丛神经损伤患者,分别行 MRI( = 251)、Tinel 试验( = 235)、菱形肌 EMG( = 181)和 MRI、Tinel 试验和 EMG( = 172)。MRI 预测健康、适合移植的 C5 脊神经根残端的准确性、敏感性和特异性分别为 93%(233/251)、84%(58/69)和 96%(175/182);Tinel 试验分别为 59%(139/235)、56%(37/66)和 60%(102/169);菱形肌 EMG 分别为 39%(71/181)、85%(43/50)和 21%(28/131)。MRI(受试者工作特征曲线下面积[AUC],0.90;<.001)优于 MRI 和 Tinel 试验(AUC,0.74)、Tinel 试验(AUC,0.59)和菱形肌 EMG(AUC,0.53)。结论 在预测急性成人臂丛神经损伤中健康、适合移植的 C5 脊神经根残端方面,MRI 表现最佳。©RSNA,2021 年。

相似文献

1
Predicting Healthy C5 Spinal Nerve Stumps Eligible for Grafting with MRI, Tinel Test, and Rhomboid Electromyography: A Retrospective Study of 295 Consecutive Brachial Plexus Surgeries.用 MRI、Tinel 试验和菱形肌肌电图预测适合移植的健康 C5 脊神经根残端:对 295 例连续臂丛神经手术的回顾性研究。
Radiology. 2021 Jul;300(1):141-151. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021202817. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
2
The value of preoperative examination and MRI for the diagnosis of graftable roots in total brachial plexus palsy.术前检查及磁共振成像在全臂丛神经麻痹可移植神经根诊断中的价值
Hand Surg Rehabil. 2019 Sep;38(4):246-250. doi: 10.1016/j.hansur.2019.06.001. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
3
Validation of the Root Analysis Score for C5 Viability in Patients With Pan-Brachial Plexus Injury.根分析评分对全臂丛神经损伤患者 C5 运动功能预后的验证。
J Hand Surg Am. 2024 Jun;49(6):526-531. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2024.01.013. Epub 2024 Mar 2.
4
Clinical Predictors of C5 Spinal Nerve Viability in Pan-Brachial Plexus Injuries.全臂丛神经损伤中 C5 脊神经存活的临床预测因素。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 Jun 1;153(6):1131e-1137e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010906. Epub 2023 Jul 4.
5
Value of clinical findings, electrodiagnosis and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of root lesions in traumatic brachial plexus injuries.临床检查、电诊断及磁共振成像在创伤性臂丛神经损伤神经根病变诊断中的价值
J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Jan;88(1):66-70.
6
MRI for Detecting Root Avulsions in Traumatic Adult Brachial Plexus Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Accuracy.MRI 检测创伤性成人臂丛神经损伤根撕脱:诊断准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Radiology. 2019 Oct;293(1):125-133. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019190218. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
7
The current role of diagnostic imaging in the preoperative workup for refractory neonatal brachial plexus palsy.诊断性影像学在难治性新生儿臂丛神经麻痹术前检查中的当前作用。
Childs Nerv Syst. 2016 Aug;32(8):1393-7. doi: 10.1007/s00381-016-3106-2. Epub 2016 May 14.
8
MRI evaluation of nerve root avulsion in neonatal brachial plexus palsy: understanding the presence of isolated dorsal/ventral rootlet disruption.MRI 评估新生儿臂丛神经麻痹中的神经根撕脱:了解孤立的背根/腹根束中断的存在。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2021 Mar 12;27(5):589-593. doi: 10.3171/2020.9.PEDS20326. Print 2021 May 1.
9
Diagnostic performance of MRI and MR myelography in infants with a brachial plexus birth injury.MRI及磁共振脊髓造影对臂丛神经产伤婴儿的诊断效能
Pediatr Radiol. 2006 Dec;36(12):1295-9. doi: 10.1007/s00247-006-0321-0. Epub 2006 Oct 7.
10
Transfer of the rhomboid nerve for restoration of shoulder external rotation in partial brachial plexus palsy.菱形肌神经移位术治疗部分臂丛神经损伤后肩外旋功能障碍
Injury. 2020 Dec;51 Suppl 4:S84-S87. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.02.005. Epub 2020 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Brachial plexus injuries in the contact athlete: a narrative review.接触性运动运动员的臂丛神经损伤:一篇叙述性综述。
Ann Jt. 2025 Apr 17;10:18. doi: 10.21037/aoj-24-67. eCollection 2025.
2
Global trends in surgical approach to neonatal brachial plexus palsy: a systematic review.新生儿臂丛神经麻痹手术治疗的全球趋势:一项系统综述
Front Surg. 2025 Jan 6;11:1359719. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1359719. eCollection 2024.
3
Which Tests Should Be Routinely Ordered Prior to Brachial Plexus Reconstruction? Results of a Delphi Panel.在臂丛神经重建术前应常规进行哪些检查?德尔菲专家小组的结果。
HSS J. 2025 Feb;21(1):21-26. doi: 10.1177/15563316241234336. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
4
Magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of suspected neurogenic thoracic outlet syndrome-a systematic scoping review.磁共振成像用于诊断疑似神经源性胸廓出口综合征——一项系统综述
Front Physiol. 2023 Oct 18;14:1198165. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1198165. eCollection 2023.
5
Factors Affecting C5 Viability and Demographic Variability in Two Brachial Plexus Centers.影响两个臂丛神经中心C5活力和人口统计学变异性的因素
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Jun 20;11(6):e5073. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005073. eCollection 2023 Jun.