• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

韩国《维持生命治疗决定法》实施后癌症患者决策和卫生服务利用分析。

Analysis of Cancer Patient Decision-Making and Health Service Utilization after Enforcement of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision-Making Act in Korea.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea.

Center for Palliative Care and Clinical Ethics, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jan;54(1):20-29. doi: 10.4143/crt.2021.131. Epub 2021 Apr 12.

DOI:10.4143/crt.2021.131
PMID:33848413
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8756111/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to confirm the decision-making patterns for life-sustaining treatment (LST) and analyze medical service utilization changes after enforcement of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision-Making Act.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Of 1,237 patients who completed legal forms for life-sustaining treatment (hereafter called the LST form) at three academic hospitals and died at the same institutions, 1,018 cancer patients were included. Medical service utilization and costs were analyzed using claims data.

RESULTS

The median time to death from completion of the LST form was three days (range, 0 to 248 days). Of these, 517 people died within two days of completing the document, and 36.1% of all patients prepared the LST form themselves. The frequency of use of the intensive care unit, continuous renal replacement therapy, and mechanical ventilation was significantly higher when the families filled out the form without knowing the patient's intention. In the top 10% of the medical expense groups, the decision-makers for LST were family members rather than patients (28% patients vs. 32% family members who knew and 40% family members who did not know the patient's intention).

CONCLUSION

The cancer patient's own decision-making rather than the family's decision was associated with earlier decision-making, less use of some critical treatments (except chemotherapy) and expensive evaluations, and a trend toward lower medical costs.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确认维持生命治疗(LST)的决策模式,并分析《维持生命治疗决策法》实施后医疗服务利用的变化。

材料和方法

在三家学术医院完成维持生命治疗法律表格(以下简称 LST 表格)并在同一机构死亡的 1237 名患者中,纳入了 1018 名癌症患者。使用索赔数据分析医疗服务的利用和费用。

结果

从完成 LST 表格到死亡的中位时间为三天(范围 0 至 248 天)。其中,517 人在完成文件后两天内死亡,36.1%的患者自行填写了 LST 表格。当家庭成员在不知道患者意愿的情况下填写表格时,重症监护室、连续肾脏替代治疗和机械通气的使用频率显著升高。在医疗费用最高的 10%的组中,LST 的决策者是家庭成员,而不是患者(28%的患者 vs. 32%的知道患者意愿的家庭成员和 40%的不知道患者意愿的家庭成员)。

结论

癌症患者自己的决策而不是家庭的决策与更早的决策、某些关键治疗(除化疗外)和昂贵评估的使用减少以及医疗费用降低的趋势有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a458/8756111/f4f092ef0e35/crt-2021-131f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a458/8756111/f4f092ef0e35/crt-2021-131f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a458/8756111/f4f092ef0e35/crt-2021-131f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Analysis of Cancer Patient Decision-Making and Health Service Utilization after Enforcement of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decision-Making Act in Korea.韩国《维持生命治疗决定法》实施后癌症患者决策和卫生服务利用分析。
Cancer Res Treat. 2022 Jan;54(1):20-29. doi: 10.4143/crt.2021.131. Epub 2021 Apr 12.
2
Changes in decision-making process for life-sustaining treatment in patients with advanced cancer after the life-sustaining treatment decisions-making act.《维持生命治疗决策法案》后晚期癌症患者维持生命治疗决策过程的变化。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Apr 27;20(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00759-6.
3
Implication of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Act on End-of-Life Care for Korean Terminal Patients.《维持生命治疗决定法》对韩国终末期患者临终关怀的影响。
Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jul;52(3):917-924. doi: 10.4143/crt.2019.740. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
4
Preparation and Practice of the Necessary Documents in Hospital for the "Act on Decision of Life-Sustaining Treatment for Patients at the End-of-Life".《终末期患者生命维持治疗决定相关文书的准备与实践》医院准备及实施要点
Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Oct;53(4):926-934. doi: 10.4143/crt.2021.326. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
5
The Situation of Life-Sustaining Treatment One Year after Enforcement of the Act on Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment for Patients at the End-of-Life in Korea: Data of National Agency for Management of Life-Sustaining Treatment.韩国《末期患者维持生命治疗决定法》实施 1 年后的维持生命治疗状况:国家维持生命治疗管理机构数据。
Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Oct;53(4):897-907. doi: 10.4143/crt.2021.327. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
6
Life-Sustaining Treatment States in Korean Cancer Patients after Enforcement of Act on Decisions on Life-Sustaining Treatment for Patients at the End of Life.《终末期患者维持生命治疗决定法案》实施后韩国癌症患者的维持生命治疗意愿状况
Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Oct;53(4):908-916. doi: 10.4143/crt.2021.325. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
7
Terminally Ill Taiwanese Cancer Patients' and Family Caregivers' Agreement on Patterns of Life-Sustaining Treatment Preferences Is Poor to Fair and Declines Over a Decade: Results From Two Independent Cross-Sectional Studies.晚期台湾癌症患者及其家庭照顾者在维持生命治疗偏好模式上的一致性较差且在十年间呈下降趋势:两项独立横断面研究的结果
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2017 Jul;54(1):35-45.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.02.013. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
8
Issues and implications of the life-sustaining treatment decision act: comparing the data from the survey and clinical data of inpatients at the end-of-life process.《维持生命治疗决策法案的问题与影响:对终末期患者调查数据与临床数据的比较》
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Aug 19;25(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01088-y.
9
A National Study of Life-Sustaining Treatments in South Korea: What Factors Affect Decision-Making?一项针对韩国的维持生命治疗的全国性研究:哪些因素影响决策?
Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Apr;53(2):593-600. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.803. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
10
A Decade of Changes in Family Caregivers' Preferences for Life-Sustaining Treatments for Terminally Ill Cancer Patients at End of Life in the Context of a Family-Oriented Society.在以家庭为导向的社会背景下,临终癌症患者生命末期家庭照顾者对维持生命治疗的偏好变化十年
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2016 May;51(5):907-915.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.326. Epub 2016 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Translation, Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Advance Care Planning Engagement Survey for Korean Older People.韩国老年人预立医疗照护计划参与度调查问卷的翻译、文化调适与效度验证
Int J Older People Nurs. 2025 Jul;20(4):e70039. doi: 10.1111/opn.70039.
2
The Impact of Advanced Care Planning on Hospice Utilization in Patients with Cancer: A Nationwide Analysis in Korea.癌症患者的临终关怀计划对临终关怀利用的影响:韩国的全国性分析。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 27;17(9):1471. doi: 10.3390/cancers17091471.
3
Issues and implications of the life-sustaining treatment decision act: comparing the data from the survey and clinical data of inpatients at the end-of-life process.

本文引用的文献

1
A National Study of Life-Sustaining Treatments in South Korea: What Factors Affect Decision-Making?一项针对韩国的维持生命治疗的全国性研究:哪些因素影响决策?
Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Apr;53(2):593-600. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.803. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
2
Difficulties Doctors Experience during Life-Sustaining Treatment Discussion after Enactment of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Act: A Cross-Sectional Study.《生命维持治疗决策法案颁布后医生在进行生命维持治疗讨论时所面临的困难:一项横断面研究》
Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Apr;53(2):584-592. doi: 10.4143/crt.2020.735. Epub 2020 Nov 19.
3
Forgoing life-sustaining treatment - a comparative analysis of regulations in Japan, Korea, Taiwan, and England.
《维持生命治疗决策法案的问题与影响:对终末期患者调查数据与临床数据的比较》
BMC Med Ethics. 2024 Aug 19;25(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12910-024-01088-y.
4
Nurses' engagement in advance care planning practices: A descriptive cross-sectional study.护士参与预先护理计划实践:一项描述性横断面研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2025 Jun;34(6):2149-2162. doi: 10.1111/jocn.17376. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
5
Factors Affecting Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions and Changes in Clinical Practice after Enforcement of the Life-Sustaining Treatment (LST) Decision Act: A Tertiary Hospital Experience in Korea.《维持生命治疗(LST)决策法》实施后影响维持生命治疗决策的因素及临床实践变化:韩国一家三级医院的经验
Cancer Res Treat. 2025 Jan;57(1):280-288. doi: 10.4143/crt.2024.360. Epub 2024 Jul 1.
6
Comparison of factors influencing the decision to withdraw life-sustaining treatment in intensive care unit patients after implementation of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Act in Korea.韩国实施《维持生命治疗法》后重症监护病房患者放弃维持生命治疗决策的影响因素比较
Acute Crit Care. 2024 May;39(2):294-303. doi: 10.4266/acc.2023.01130. Epub 2024 May 24.
7
Development and Feasibility Evaluation of Smart Cancer Care 2.0 Based on Patient-Reported Outcomes for Post-Discharge Management of Patients with Cancer.基于患者报告结局的癌症患者出院后管理的智慧癌症关爱 2.0 的开发和可行性评估。
Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Oct;56(4):1040-1049. doi: 10.4143/crt.2024.003. Epub 2024 Apr 9.
8
For the Universal Right to Access Quality End-of-Life Care in Korea: Broadening Our Perspective After the 2018 Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Act.关于韩国获得优质临终关怀的普遍权利:2018年维持生命治疗决策法案后的拓展视野
J Korean Med Sci. 2024 Apr 1;39(12):e123. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e123.
9
Characteristics and outcomes of patients with do-not-resuscitate and physician orders for life-sustaining treatment in a medical intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study.在医疗重症监护病房中,具有“不复苏”和医师生命维持治疗医嘱的患者的特征和结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2024 Feb 15;23(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01375-w.
10
Characteristics of Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions: National Data Analysis in South Korea.维持生命治疗决策的特征:韩国的全国数据分析
Asian Bioeth Rev. 2023 Nov 11;16(1):33-46. doi: 10.1007/s41649-023-00266-1. eCollection 2024 Jan.
放弃维持生命的治疗——日本、韩国、台湾地区和英国的法规比较分析。 (注:台湾是中国的省级行政区,不是一个国家,这里仅为遵循原文内容准确翻译。)
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Oct 16;21(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00535-w.
4
Implication of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Decisions Act on End-of-Life Care for Korean Terminal Patients.《维持生命治疗决定法》对韩国终末期患者临终关怀的影响。
Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jul;52(3):917-924. doi: 10.4143/crt.2019.740. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
5
Completion rate of physician orders for life-sustaining treatment for patients with metastatic or recurrent cancer: a preliminary, cross-sectional study.转移性或复发性癌症患者生命维持治疗医嘱完成率:初步的横断面研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2019 Oct 22;18(1):84. doi: 10.1186/s12904-019-0475-9.
6
Survival rates following medical intensive care unit admission from 2003 to 2013: An observational study based on a representative population-based sample cohort of Korean patients.2003年至2013年入住医学重症监护病房后的生存率:一项基于韩国患者具有代表性的基于人群样本队列的观察性研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Sep;98(37):e17090. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017090.
7
National Policies Fostering Hospice Care Increased Hospice Utilization and Reduced the Invasiveness of End-of-Life Care for Cancer Patients.促进临终关怀的国家政策提高了临终关怀的利用率,并降低了癌症患者临终护理的侵入性。
Oncologist. 2017 Jul;22(7):843-849. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0367. Epub 2017 Apr 13.
8
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Preferences of Advance Decisions, End-of-Life Care, and Place of Care and Death in Hong Kong. A Population-Based Telephone Survey of 1067 Adults.香港成人 1067 名的基于人口的电话调查:预先指示、临终关怀、护理和死亡地点的知识、态度和偏好。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;18(4):367.e19-367.e27. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.12.066. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
9
A Decade of Changes in Preferences for Life-Sustaining Treatments Among Terminally Ill Patients With Cancer.癌症终末期患者对生命维持治疗偏好的十年变化。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2015 Dec;13(12):1510-8. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2015.0179.
10
Timing of POLST Form Completion by Cause of Death.根据死因完成POLST表格的时间。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2015 Nov;50(5):650-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.06.004. Epub 2015 Jul 7.