Centro Provincial de Drogodependencias, Málaga, Spain.
Centro Provincial de Drogodependencias, Cádiz, Spain.
Harm Reduct J. 2021 Apr 13;18(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12954-021-00488-2.
Methadone and buprenorphine are the most prevalent types of opioid maintenance programs in Andalusia. The main objective is comparing the functional status of patients with pharmacological opioid maintenance treatments according to different socio-demographic characteristic, health and disabilities domains and sexual difficulties.
A total of 593 patients from the Andalusia community, 329 were undergoing methadone treatment and 264 were undergoing buprenorphine treatment. The patients were interviewed by socio-demographic and opioid-related variables, assessed by functioning, disability and health domains (WHODAS 2.0.) and for sexual problems (PRSexDQ-SALSEX).
We found significant differences in the socio-demographic and the opioid-related variables as the onset of opioid use, being on previous maintenance programs, opioid intravenous use, the length of previous maintenance programs, polydrug use and elevated seroprevalence rates (HCV and HIV) between the methadone group and the buprenorphine group. Regarding health and disability domains there were differences in the Understanding and communication domain, Getting around domain, Participation in society domain and in the WHODAS 2.0. simple and complex score, favoring buprenorphine-treated patients. The methadone group referred elevated sexual impairments compared with the buprenorphine group. Opioid-related variables as seroprevalence rates, other previous lifetime maintenance program, the daily opioid dosage and the daily alcohol use are the most discriminative variables between both groups. Participation in society variables and sexual problems were the most important clinical variables in distinguishing the methadone group from the buprenorphine group regarding their functional status.
The methadone group showed higher prevalence in opioid dependence-related variables, elevated disabilities in participation in society activities and sexual problems compared with the buprenorphine group. This study shows the importance of carry out a functional evaluation in the healthcare follow-up, especially in those areas related with social activity and with sexual problems.
美沙酮和丁丙诺啡是安达卢西亚最常见的阿片类药物维持治疗类型。主要目的是根据不同的社会人口统计学特征、健康和残疾领域以及性困难,比较接受药物性阿片类药物维持治疗的患者的功能状态。
共有来自安达卢西亚社区的 593 名患者,其中 329 名接受美沙酮治疗,264 名接受丁丙诺啡治疗。通过社会人口统计学和阿片类药物相关变量对患者进行访谈,通过功能、残疾和健康领域(WHODAS 2.0)以及性问题(PRSexDQ-SALSEX)进行评估。
我们发现,在社会人口统计学和阿片类药物相关变量方面存在显著差异,如阿片类药物使用的开始时间、之前是否参加过维持治疗项目、阿片类药物静脉使用、之前维持治疗项目的长度、多药物使用和高血清阳性率(丙型肝炎病毒和人类免疫缺陷病毒),美沙酮组和丁丙诺啡组之间存在差异。在健康和残疾领域,理解和沟通领域、四处走动领域、参与社会领域以及 WHODAS 2.0 简单和复杂评分存在差异,丁丙诺啡治疗组更有利。与丁丙诺啡组相比,美沙酮组报告的性损伤更高。与两组相比,阿片类药物相关变量(如血清阳性率、其他既往终生维持治疗项目、每日阿片类药物剂量和每日饮酒量)是区分两组最具鉴别力的变量。参与社会活动的变量和性问题是区分美沙酮组和丁丙诺啡组功能状态的最重要的临床变量。
与丁丙诺啡组相比,美沙酮组在与阿片类药物依赖相关的变量、参与社会活动的残疾程度以及性问题方面的流行率更高。这项研究表明,在医疗保健随访中进行功能评估非常重要,特别是在与社会活动和性问题相关的领域。