Qian Jian, Zhang Qian, Cao Qiang, Jiang Jie, Li Pu, Bao Meiling, Qin Chao, Wang Zengjun, Hua Lixin, Shao Pengfei
Department of Urology, First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Department of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 Mar;10(3):1030-1039. doi: 10.21037/tau-20-1126.
This study investigated a comfortable suture angle (CSA) with optimized trocar position for closing the defect during renorrhaphy in retroperitoneal laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN). The feasibility, usefulness, and safety of achieving the CSA with modified trocar position were determined for different tumor types.
Two optimized trocar positions were introduced for different tumor types. A suture angle was based on the tumor plane of the superficial parenchyma defect and the line formed by the needle holder. Preliminary surgical simulations determined a CSA that combined the least suture time with the greatest ease of performance. Achieving the CSA was attempted during renorrhaphy of 106 enrolled patients undergoing retroperitoneal LPN. Patients' characteristics, operative features, and follow-up information were collected and analyzed.
For 89 (83.96%) patients, a CSA was successfully reached and parenchyma recovered. The remaining 17 patients were successfully sutured, but the attempt to achieve a CSA failed. For the CSA group, the suture, clamping, and overall operative times were significantly less than that of the non-CSA patients. The groups were similar regarding estimated blood loss, positive surgical margin, and rates of glomerular filtration reduction and complications. Univariable analyses determined that tumor location, growth pattern, and R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score (RNS) may influence the success of this approach. Multivariable analyses indicated that only tumor location and RNS were independent factors affecting successful achievement of the CSA.
Through different kidney position changes, the CSA could be used to ease the suture process. It is feasible and safe to perform a CSA with optimized trocar position during LPN. Tumor location and RNS may influence the approach to get a CSA.
本研究探讨了在腹膜后腹腔镜下部分肾切除术(LPN)肾缝合术中,采用优化的套管针位置以获得舒适缝合角度(CSA)来闭合缺损的情况。针对不同肿瘤类型,确定了通过改良套管针位置实现CSA的可行性、实用性和安全性。
针对不同肿瘤类型引入了两种优化的套管针位置。缝合角度基于浅表实质缺损的肿瘤平面与持针器形成的线。初步手术模拟确定了一种结合最短缝合时间和最大操作便利性的CSA。在106例接受腹膜后LPN的入选患者的肾缝合术中尝试实现CSA。收集并分析患者的特征、手术特点和随访信息。
89例(83.96%)患者成功达到CSA且实质恢复。其余17例患者成功缝合,但实现CSA的尝试失败。对于CSA组,缝合、夹闭和总手术时间显著少于非CSA患者。两组在估计失血量、手术切缘阳性以及肾小球滤过率降低和并发症发生率方面相似。单变量分析确定肿瘤位置、生长模式和R.E.N.A.L.肾计量评分(RNS)可能影响该方法的成功。多变量分析表明,只有肿瘤位置和RNS是影响成功实现CSA的独立因素。
通过不同的肾脏位置改变,CSA可用于简化缝合过程。在LPN期间采用优化的套管针位置实现CSA是可行且安全的。肿瘤位置和RNS可能影响获得CSA的方法。