Luquiens Amandine, Berger-Viergat Aurélie, Larrieu Agathe, Artigaud Laura, Fener Clémentine, Adamson Simon, Laprévote Vincent, Rolland Benjamin
Paris-Saclay University, Université Paris-Sud, UVSQ, CESP, INSERM, Villejuif, France.
Service d'Addictologie, CHU Nîmes, Nîmes, France.
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2021 Nov;40(7):1334-1339. doi: 10.1111/dar.13298. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
Several questionnaires have been developed for screening cannabis use disorder in clinical populations, but very few studies have compared the screening abilities of the different instruments. Here, we aimed to confirm the psychometric properties of a French version of the Cannabis Use Disorder Identification Test-Revised (CUDIT-R), and to compare its screening abilities with those of the Cannabis Abuse Screening Test (CAST), in subjects consulting in mental health settings.
Two hundred and thirteen cannabis smokers who sought treatment for any type of mental disorder, recruited in four French centres, completed the French CUDIT-R (CUDIT-R-Fr) and the full version of the CAST, and were assessed for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition criteria of cannabis use disorder by an addiction specialist. They were retested with the CUDIT-R-Fr after approximately a week. The factorial construct validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the CUDIT-R-Fr were assessed. The compared sensitivity and specificity of the CAST and CUDIT-R-Fr were explored, using the clinician assessment as the reference.
The French CUDIT-R showed a good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89) and an excellent test-retest reliability (ρ = 0.97). The sensitivity and specificity for screening cannabis use disorder were 0.81 and 0.77 for the CUDIT-R, and 0.92 and 0.63 for the CAST, respectively.
Based on the recommended cut-offs, the CAST appeared more sensitive, while the CUDIT-R was more specific, for screening cannabis use disorder in a population of cannabis users with heterogeneous types of mental health disorders.
已经开发了几种问卷用于在临床人群中筛查大麻使用障碍,但很少有研究比较不同工具的筛查能力。在此,我们旨在确认法语版大麻使用障碍识别测试修订版(CUDIT-R)的心理测量特性,并在心理健康机构就诊的受试者中,将其筛查能力与大麻滥用筛查测试(CAST)的筛查能力进行比较。
在四个法国中心招募的213名因任何类型精神障碍寻求治疗的大麻吸烟者,完成了法语版CUDIT-R(CUDIT-R-Fr)和完整版本的CAST,并由一名成瘾专家根据《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版标准对大麻使用障碍进行评估。大约一周后,他们再次接受CUDIT-R-Fr测试。评估了CUDIT-R-Fr的因子结构效度、内部一致性和重测信度。以临床医生的评估为参考,探讨了CAST和CUDIT-R-Fr的比较敏感性和特异性。
法语版CUDIT-R显示出良好的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha = 0.89)和出色的重测信度(ρ = 0.97)。CUDIT-R筛查大麻使用障碍的敏感性和特异性分别为0.81和0.77,CAST的敏感性和特异性分别为0.92和0.63。
基于推荐的临界值,在患有不同类型心理健康障碍的大麻使用者群体中筛查大麻使用障碍时,CAST似乎更敏感,而CUDIT-R更具特异性。