• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加利福尼亚州实施烟草 21 政策后 18-20 岁青少年吸烟行为:与其他州的差分分析。

Smoking behavior in 18-20 year-olds after tobacco 21 policy implementation in California: A difference-in-differences analysis with other states.

机构信息

Division of Health Policy and Management, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States.

Division of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, United States.

出版信息

Prev Med. 2021 Jul;148:106553. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106553. Epub 2021 Apr 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106553
PMID:33862032
Abstract

In June 2016, California implemented a Tobacco 21 (T21) policy that increased the minimum sale age of tobacco products from 18 to 21. This study examined the association between California's T21 policy and smoking behavior (ever, current, daily, and nondaily) in 18-20 year-olds using data from the 2012-2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (n = 15,863). The annual change in odds of smoking among 18-20 year-olds post-policy (July 2016-December 2019) was compared with the pre-policy period (January 2012 - June 2016) 1) within California and 2) compared with states without a T21 policy. As a sensitivity analysis, 21-23 year-olds in California were used as the referent. Difference-in-difference estimates (D-I-D) were calculated using adjusted logistic regression and compared the post to pre-policy change in trends in California to the referent groups. Before California's T21 policy, there was an 11% annual decrease in the odds of ever smoking among 18-20 year-olds in California and a 6% decrease in the referent states. After the policy, these trends did not change significantly. Results for current smoking were similar. For daily smoking, there was an 8% annual decrease before the policy and a 26% annual decrease after the policy among 18-20 year-olds in California; D-I-D estimates were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.57, 1.14) using referent states as the comparison and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.41, 0.95) using 21-23 year-olds in California as the comparison. There was an association between California's T21 policy and a decrease in daily smoking among 18-20 year-olds, compared with 21-23 year-olds, more than three years post-implementation.

摘要

2016 年 6 月,加利福尼亚州实施了一项烟草 21 (T21)政策,将烟草产品的最低销售年龄从 18 岁提高到 21 岁。本研究使用 2012-2019 年行为风险因素监测系统的数据(n=15863),研究了加利福尼亚州 T21 政策与 18-20 岁青少年吸烟行为(曾吸烟、当前吸烟、每日吸烟和非每日吸烟)之间的关联。政策后(2016 年 7 月至 2019 年 12 月),与政策前(2012 年 1 月至 2016 年 6 月)相比,1)加利福尼亚州内和 2)与没有 T21 政策的州相比,18-20 岁青少年吸烟的几率每年变化情况。作为敏感性分析,将加利福尼亚州 21-23 岁青少年作为参照组。使用调整后的逻辑回归计算差异-差异估计值(D-I-D),比较加利福尼亚州政策前后吸烟趋势的变化与参照组。在加利福尼亚州 T21 政策实施之前,18-20 岁青少年中曾吸烟的几率每年下降 11%,而参照州则下降 6%。在该政策之后,这些趋势并没有显著变化。当前吸烟的结果相似。对于每日吸烟,在该政策之前,18-20 岁青少年中每年下降 8%,而在该政策之后,每年下降 26%;使用参照州作为比较,D-I-D 估计值为 0.80(95%CI:0.57,1.14),使用加利福尼亚州 21-23 岁青少年作为比较,D-I-D 估计值为 0.62(95%CI:0.41,0.95)。加利福尼亚州 T21 政策的实施与 18-20 岁青少年每日吸烟率的下降有关,与 21-23 岁青少年相比,这一关联在实施三年多后显现出来。

相似文献

1
Smoking behavior in 18-20 year-olds after tobacco 21 policy implementation in California: A difference-in-differences analysis with other states.加利福尼亚州实施烟草 21 政策后 18-20 岁青少年吸烟行为:与其他州的差分分析。
Prev Med. 2021 Jul;148:106553. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106553. Epub 2021 Apr 18.
2
E-cigarette and cigarette purchasing among young adults before and after implementation of California's tobacco 21 policy.加州 21 岁购烟法实施前后青少年电子烟和香烟购买情况。
Tob Control. 2021 Mar;30(2):206-211. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2019-055417. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
3
Associations of California's Tobacco 21 Minimum Sales Age Law with Tobacco Use Among Sexual Minority Adolescents: A Trends Analysis.加利福尼亚州 21 岁最低销售年龄法与性少数青少年烟草使用之间的关联:趋势分析。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Oct 26;24(11):1834-1839. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac134.
4
Evaluation of California's 'Tobacco 21' law.加州“21 岁以下禁售烟草”法律评估
Tob Control. 2018 Nov;27(6):656-662. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2017-054088. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
5
Adolescent smoking decline during California's tobacco control programme.加利福尼亚州烟草控制项目期间青少年吸烟率的下降
Tob Control. 2005 Jun;14(3):207-12. doi: 10.1136/tc.2004.010116.
6
California's tobacco 21 minimum sales age law and adolescents' tobacco and nicotine use: differential associations among racial and ethnic groups.加利福尼亚州烟草最低销售年龄21岁法律与青少年烟草和尼古丁使用:种族和族裔群体之间的差异关联
Tob Control. 2022 Dec;31(e2):e126-e133. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056219. Epub 2021 Jun 30.
7
Flavored Tobacco Sales Restrictions and Teen E-cigarette Use: Quasi-experimental Evidence From California.调味烟草销售限制与青少年电子烟使用:来自加利福尼亚州的准实验证据。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2023 Jan 1;25(1):127-134. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac200.
8
US Tobacco 21 Policies and Potential Mortality Reductions by State.美国21岁烟草销售限制政策与各州潜在的死亡率降低情况
JAMA Health Forum. 2024 Dec 6;5(12):e244445. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.4445.
9
Building and Scaling-up California Quits: Supporting Health Systems Change for Tobacco Treatment.建设和扩大加州戒烟计划:支持卫生系统为烟草治疗做出改变。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Dec;55(6 Suppl 2):S214-S221. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.07.045.
10
Using a cessation-related outcome index to assess California's cessation progress at the population level.使用与戒烟相关的结果指标评估加利福尼亚州在人群层面的戒烟进展。
Tob Control. 2010 Apr;19 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i56-61. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.031047.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis of Tobacco 21 policies and youth tobacco use: implications for future policy research.对21岁烟草限购政策与青少年烟草使用的系统评价和荟萃分析:对未来政策研究的启示
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025 Aug 8;50:101208. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101208. eCollection 2025 Oct.
2
A review of the landscape of state Tobacco 21 laws: Key components, research challenges, and future directions.州级烟草 21 岁限购法概况综述:关键要素、研究挑战及未来方向
Drug Alcohol Depend Rep. 2024 Apr 24;12:100236. doi: 10.1016/j.dadr.2024.100236. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Public Perception of the Tobacco 21 Amendment on Twitter in the United States: Observational Study.
美国社交媒体上公众对烟草 21 修正案的看法:观察性研究。
JMIR Infodemiology. 2024 Sep 25;4:e53899. doi: 10.2196/53899.
4
What is the Relationship Between Raising the Minimum Legal Sales Age of Tobacco Above 20 and Cigarette Smoking? A Systematic Review.将烟草最低合法销售年龄提高到20岁以上与吸烟之间有什么关系?一项系统综述。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2025 Feb 24;27(3):369-377. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae206.
5
Interaction Between State-Level Cigarette Prices and County-Level Tobacco 21 Coverage on Cigarette Smoking Outcomes Among US Adolescents.州级香烟价格与县级烟草 21 覆盖率对美国青少年吸烟结果的相互影响。
J Adolesc Health. 2024 Sep;75(3):508-515. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2024.05.023. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
6
Associations between tobacco 21 and state flavour restrictions with young adult tobacco use.烟草21岁限购令及州口味限制与年轻成年人烟草使用之间的关联。
Tob Control. 2024 Jul 2. doi: 10.1136/tc-2023-058448.
7
Perception of and legal compliance with the law prohibiting cigarette sales to minors in Thailand following the raising of the minimum selling age to 20 years: a cross-sectional survey.提高最低售烟年龄至 20 岁后泰国对禁止向未成年人售烟法律的认知和遵守情况:一项横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2023 Nov 3;13(11):e072411. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072411.
8
Awareness and use of tobacco products among underage individuals: findings from the altria client services underage tobacco use survey 2020-2022.未成年人群体对烟草制品的认知和使用情况:奥驰亚客户服务公司 2020-2022 年未成年烟草使用调查结果。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Apr 7;23(1):662. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15610-1.
9
Assessing the Effectiveness of Tobacco 21 Laws to Reduce Underage Access to Tobacco: Protocol for a Repeated Multi-Site Study.评估烟草21岁限购法减少未成年人获取烟草的有效性:一项重复多地点研究的方案
Methods Protoc. 2023 Mar 10;6(2):27. doi: 10.3390/mps6020027.
10
Rates of Age Verification for Cigarette and E-cigarette Purchases as a Function of State T21 Laws Before and After Implementation of the Federal T21 Law in the United States.美国联邦 T21 法案实施前后,各州 T21 法案对香烟和电子烟购买年龄验证的影响。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2023 Jun 9;25(7):1386-1390. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntad044.