Department of Kinesiology, California Baptist University, 8432 Magnolia Ave, Riverside, CA, 92504, USA.
Department of Kinesiology and Health Science, Biola University, 13800 Biola Ave, La Mirada, CA, 90639, USA.
J Therm Biol. 2021 Apr;97:102898. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2021.102898. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
To examine the effectiveness of hot water immersion (HWI) as a heat acclimation strategy in comparison to time and temperature matched, exercise-heat acclimation (EHA).
8 males performed heat stress tests (HST) (45 min of cycling at 50% of VO in 40 °C, 40% RH) before and after heat acclimation sessions. Acclimation sessions were either three consecutive bouts of HWI (40 min of submersion at 40 °C) or EHA (40 min of cycling at 50% VO in 40 °C, 40% RH).
Average change in tympanic temperature (T) was significantly higher following HWI (2.1 °C ± 0.4) compared to EHA (1.5 °C ± 0.4) (P < 0.05). Decreases in peak heart rate (HR) (HWI: -10 bpm ± 8; EHA: -6 ± 7), average HR (-7 bpm ± 6; -3 ± 4), and average core temperature (-0.4 °C ± 0.3; -0.2 ± 0.4) were evident following acclimation (P < 0.05), but not different between interventions (P > 0.05). Peak rate of perceived exertion (RPE) decreased for HWI and EHA (P < 0.05). Peak thermal sensation (TS) decreased following HWI (P < 0.05) but was not different between interventions (P > 0.05). Plasma volume increased in both intervention groups (HWI: 5.9% ± 5.1; EHA: 5.4% ± 3.7) but was not statistically different (P > 0.05).
HWI induced significantly greater thermal strain compared to EHA at equivalent temperatures during time-matched exposures. However, the greater degree of thermal strain did not result in between intervention differences for cardiovascular, thermoregulatory, or perceptual variables. Findings suggest three HWI sessions may be a potential means to lower HR, TCore, and perceptual strain during exercise in the heat.
比较热水浸泡(HWI)和时间及温度匹配的运动热适应(EHA)作为热适应策略的效果。
8 名男性在热适应前后进行热应激测试(HST)(40°C、40%相对湿度下,50% VO 自行车运动 45 分钟)。适应阶段分别为连续 3 次 HWI(40°C 下浸泡 40 分钟)或 EHA(40°C、40%相对湿度下,50% VO 自行车运动 40 分钟)。
HWI 后鼓膜温度(T)的平均变化明显高于 EHA(2.1°C±0.4 比 1.5°C±0.4)(P<0.05)。适应后,峰值心率(HR)(HWI:-10 次/分±8;EHA:-6 次/分±7)、平均 HR(-7 次/分±6;-3 次/分±4)和平均核心温度(-0.4°C±0.3;-0.2°C±0.4)均有明显下降(P<0.05),但干预之间无差异(P>0.05)。HWI 和 EHA 的峰值感觉用力(RPE)均下降(P<0.05)。HWI 后峰值热感觉(TS)下降(P<0.05),但干预之间无差异(P>0.05)。两种干预措施均使血浆容量增加(HWI:5.9%±5.1;EHA:5.4%±3.7),但无统计学差异(P>0.05)。
在时间匹配的暴露下,与 EHA 相比,HWI 引起的热应激明显更大。然而,更大的热应激程度并没有导致干预之间在心血管、体温调节或知觉变量上的差异。研究结果表明,三次 HWI 可能是一种降低运动中热应激时 HR、TCore 和知觉应激的潜在方法。