Suppr超能文献

短期热水浸泡会导致明显的热应激和部分热适应;与热暴露运动的比较。

Short-term hot water immersion results in substantial thermal strain and partial heat acclimation; comparisons with heat-exercise exposures.

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology, California Baptist University, 8432 Magnolia Ave, Riverside, CA, 92504, USA.

Department of Kinesiology and Health Science, Biola University, 13800 Biola Ave, La Mirada, CA, 90639, USA.

出版信息

J Therm Biol. 2021 Apr;97:102898. doi: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2021.102898. Epub 2021 Feb 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effectiveness of hot water immersion (HWI) as a heat acclimation strategy in comparison to time and temperature matched, exercise-heat acclimation (EHA).

METHODS

8 males performed heat stress tests (HST) (45 min of cycling at 50% of VO in 40 °C, 40% RH) before and after heat acclimation sessions. Acclimation sessions were either three consecutive bouts of HWI (40 min of submersion at 40 °C) or EHA (40 min of cycling at 50% VO in 40 °C, 40% RH).

RESULTS

Average change in tympanic temperature (T) was significantly higher following HWI (2.1 °C ± 0.4) compared to EHA (1.5 °C ± 0.4) (P < 0.05). Decreases in peak heart rate (HR) (HWI: -10 bpm ± 8; EHA: -6 ± 7), average HR (-7 bpm ± 6; -3 ± 4), and average core temperature (-0.4 °C ± 0.3; -0.2 ± 0.4) were evident following acclimation (P < 0.05), but not different between interventions (P > 0.05). Peak rate of perceived exertion (RPE) decreased for HWI and EHA (P < 0.05). Peak thermal sensation (TS) decreased following HWI (P < 0.05) but was not different between interventions (P > 0.05). Plasma volume increased in both intervention groups (HWI: 5.9% ± 5.1; EHA: 5.4% ± 3.7) but was not statistically different (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

HWI induced significantly greater thermal strain compared to EHA at equivalent temperatures during time-matched exposures. However, the greater degree of thermal strain did not result in between intervention differences for cardiovascular, thermoregulatory, or perceptual variables. Findings suggest three HWI sessions may be a potential means to lower HR, TCore, and perceptual strain during exercise in the heat.

摘要

目的

比较热水浸泡(HWI)和时间及温度匹配的运动热适应(EHA)作为热适应策略的效果。

方法

8 名男性在热适应前后进行热应激测试(HST)(40°C、40%相对湿度下,50% VO 自行车运动 45 分钟)。适应阶段分别为连续 3 次 HWI(40°C 下浸泡 40 分钟)或 EHA(40°C、40%相对湿度下,50% VO 自行车运动 40 分钟)。

结果

HWI 后鼓膜温度(T)的平均变化明显高于 EHA(2.1°C±0.4 比 1.5°C±0.4)(P<0.05)。适应后,峰值心率(HR)(HWI:-10 次/分±8;EHA:-6 次/分±7)、平均 HR(-7 次/分±6;-3 次/分±4)和平均核心温度(-0.4°C±0.3;-0.2°C±0.4)均有明显下降(P<0.05),但干预之间无差异(P>0.05)。HWI 和 EHA 的峰值感觉用力(RPE)均下降(P<0.05)。HWI 后峰值热感觉(TS)下降(P<0.05),但干预之间无差异(P>0.05)。两种干预措施均使血浆容量增加(HWI:5.9%±5.1;EHA:5.4%±3.7),但无统计学差异(P>0.05)。

结论

在时间匹配的暴露下,与 EHA 相比,HWI 引起的热应激明显更大。然而,更大的热应激程度并没有导致干预之间在心血管、体温调节或知觉变量上的差异。研究结果表明,三次 HWI 可能是一种降低运动中热应激时 HR、TCore 和知觉应激的潜在方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验