Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal -
Int Angiol. 2021 Aug;40(4):270-276. doi: 10.23736/S0392-9590.21.04663-0. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
Iliac venous stenting is an established treatment option for both post-thrombotic and non-thrombotic iliac venous obstructions. Nonetheless, there is still no consensus on the best medical practice regarding some of these interventions. One area of debate is the safety of extending venous stents across the inguinal ligament (IL), with contradictory results from various authors and overall poor-quality research. This review aims to summarise current knowledge on the effect of venous stent placement across the IL on primary patency.
A literature search was performed on the MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science databases, which returned 531 studies. Eleven studies were included. Data were extracted using piloted forms, and, if necessary, authors were contacted to obtain further information.
Two studies were prospective cohorts, whereas the remaining 9 were retrospective cohorts. Overall study quality was weak. Four studies showed a statistically significant association between stent placement across the IL and decreased primary patency. A multivariate analysis was performed in two of those studies, yet only one maintained statistical significance after multivariate analysis. Two studies reported 4 cases of stent fracture in total, and one study reported 5 cases of stent compression. All cases of stent fracture or compression occurred at the inguinal ligament.
Although current expert opinion favors stent placement across the IL, there is still insufficient evidence to recommend for or against venous stenting across the IL. Further research is required on comparing alternatives for the treatment of iliac venous lesions that extend into the common femoral vein. Despite the establishment of venous stenting as a viable treatment option for both post-thrombotic and non-thrombotic iliac venous obstructions, there is an ongoing debate on the safety of extending such stents across the inguinal ligament. There are several publications on this subject, with conflicting results and overall poor-quality research. This is the first systematic review of published clinical evidence on the impact of venous stent placement across the IL on primary patency.
髂静脉支架置入术是治疗血栓后和非血栓性髂静脉阻塞的一种既定治疗选择。尽管如此,对于这些介入治疗中的某些最佳医疗实践,仍然没有共识。一个有争议的领域是静脉支架跨越腹股沟韧带(IL)的安全性,不同作者的结果存在矛盾,且整体研究质量较差。本综述旨在总结当前关于静脉支架跨越 IL 放置对原发性通畅率的影响的知识。
在 MEDLINE、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库中进行了文献检索,共返回 531 项研究。纳入了 11 项研究。使用预编程表格提取数据,如果需要,还联系作者以获取更多信息。
两项研究为前瞻性队列研究,而其余 9 项为回顾性队列研究。整体研究质量较弱。四项研究表明,支架跨越 IL 放置与原发性通畅率降低之间存在统计学显著关联。其中两项研究进行了多变量分析,但只有一项在多变量分析后仍保持统计学意义。两项研究总共报告了 4 例支架断裂,一项研究报告了 5 例支架压缩。所有支架断裂或压缩的病例均发生在腹股沟韧带处。
尽管目前的专家意见倾向于支架跨越 IL 放置,但仍缺乏推荐支架跨越 IL 放置或不放置的充分证据。需要进一步研究比较治疗延伸至股总静脉的髂静脉病变的替代方法。尽管静脉支架置入术已成为治疗血栓后和非血栓性髂静脉阻塞的可行治疗选择,但关于将此类支架延伸至腹股沟韧带的安全性仍存在争议。关于这个主题有几个出版物,但结果存在矛盾,且整体研究质量较差。这是对静脉支架跨越 IL 放置对原发性通畅率影响的已发表临床证据的首次系统综述。