Laboratório de Ecologia de Fragmentos Florestais, ECOFRAG, Universidade Federal de Alfenas - UNIFAL/MG, Alfenas, MG, Brazil.
International Institute for Sustainability, Estrada Dona Castorina 124, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Am J Bot. 2021 Apr;108(4):598-606. doi: 10.1002/ajb2.1634. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
Epiphytes have commensal relationships with their host trees. Besides the influence of tree traits, little has been discussed concerning the ecology of epiphytes in disturbed habitats (e.g., pasture). We herein tested whether the occurrences of pasture and forest specialist epiphytes in pastures are affected differently by tree traits. We hypothesized that (H1) the richness and abundance of generalist epiphytes would be positively associated with area availability; (H2) the richness and abundance of forest epiphyte species would be associated both with (H2.a) area availability and (H2.b) tree traits related to higher seed adherence, and/or (H2.c) less severe habitat (e.g., high humidity and more shade).
We sampled 9567 epiphyte individuals from 16 species on 759 scattered remnant trees. The epiphyte species were divided into two ecological groups: forest specialists and pasture specialists. We evaluated four host tree traits: two related to tree size (crown area and trunk diameter) and two related to habitat type (crown leaf density and bark rugosity).
The richness and abundance of both pasture and forest specialists were positively related with tree size. However, the abundance of pasture specialists was negatively related with crown leaf density, whereas richness of forest epiphytes was positively related with bark rugosity.
Large scattered trees tend to present higher richness and abundance of both pasture and forest specialist epiphytes compared to the smaller trees. However, high crown leaf density limits abundance of pasture specialist epiphytes, whereas rugose bark increases the richness of forest epiphytes.
附生植物与其宿主树木之间存在共生关系。除了树木特征的影响外,关于干扰生境(例如牧场)中附生植物的生态学,人们讨论得很少。在此,我们检验了牧场中牧场和森林专性附生植物的出现是否受到树木特征的不同影响。我们假设:(H1)一般性附生植物的丰富度和丰度与面积可用性呈正相关;(H2)森林附生植物物种的丰富度和丰度与(H2.a)面积可用性以及(H2.b)与更高种子附着力相关的树木特征,和/或(H2.c)更温和的生境(例如高湿度和更多遮荫)相关。
我们从 759 棵分散的残遗树上的 16 个物种中采集了 9567 个附生植物个体。将附生植物物种分为两个生态组:森林专性和牧场专性。我们评估了四个宿主树木特征:两个与树木大小(树冠面积和树干直径)相关,两个与栖息地类型(树冠叶片密度和树皮粗糙度)相关。
牧场和森林专性附生植物的丰富度和丰度均与树木大小呈正相关。然而,牧场专性附生植物的丰度与树冠叶片密度呈负相关,而森林附生植物的丰富度与树皮粗糙度呈正相关。
与较小的树木相比,大型分散的树木往往具有更高的牧场和森林专性附生植物的丰富度和丰度。然而,高树冠叶片密度限制了牧场专性附生植物的丰度,而粗糙的树皮增加了森林附生植物的丰富度。