Suppr超能文献

耐甲氧西林鼻腔拭子对创伤患者耐甲氧西林呼吸机相关性肺炎的预测价值。

Predictive Value of the Methicillin-Resistant Nasal Swab for Methicillin-Resistant Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in the Trauma Patient.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Department of Surgery, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, Virginia, USA.

Pharmacy Department, Department of Surgery, Inova Fairfax Medical Campus, Falls Church, Virginia, USA.

出版信息

Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2021 Nov;22(9):889-893. doi: 10.1089/sur.2020.477. Epub 2021 Apr 19.

Abstract

Many trauma centers have empiric treatment algorithms for ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) treatment prior to culture results that include antibiotic agents for methicillin-resistant (MRSA) coverage that can have adverse effects. This is the only study to evaluate risk factors and MRSA nasal swabs to risk-stratify trauma patients for MRSA VAP, thereby potentially limiting the need for empiric vancomycin. This was a single institution retrospective cohort study. Adult patients admitted to the trauma intensive care unit (ICU) between January 2013 and December 2017 who had a MRSA nasal swab and subsequently met criteria for VAP were included. Demographics, risk factors for MRSA pneumonia, and culture results were collected. A total of 140 patients met inclusion criteria. The negative predictive value (NPV) of MRSA nasal swab at predicting subsequent MRSA pneumonia was 97%. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value were 50.0%, 96.2%, and 44.4%, respectively. Smokers were more likely to develop MRSA pneumonia, odds ratio: 7.0 (p = 0.02). When considering non-smokers with a negative MRSA nasal swab, NPV was 100%. This is the only study to date that assesses the utility of MRSA nasal swab and risk factor data to guide empiric VAP antibiotic therapy in trauma patients. Smoking was found to be a risk factor for MRSA pneumonia. The use of MRSA nasal swabs in combination with smoking status to guide empiric use of MRSA coverage antibiotic agents is recommended because of a 100% NPV. When utilized, as many as 68% of patients may safely be spared MRSA coverage antibiotic agents and the related adverse effects.

摘要

许多创伤中心在获得培养结果之前,都针对呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)治疗制定了经验性治疗算法,其中包括针对耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的抗生素药物,这可能会产生不良反应。这是唯一一项评估危险因素和 MRSA 鼻拭子以对创伤患者进行 MRSA VAP 风险分层的研究,从而有可能限制经验性万古霉素的使用。这是一项单中心回顾性队列研究。纳入 2013 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间入住创伤重症监护病房(ICU)且有 MRSA 鼻拭子,随后符合 VAP 标准的成年患者。收集患者的人口统计学、MRSA 肺炎危险因素和培养结果。共有 140 名患者符合纳入标准。MRSA 鼻拭子预测随后发生的 MRSA 肺炎的阴性预测值(NPV)为 97%。敏感性、特异性和阳性预测值分别为 50.0%、96.2%和 44.4%。吸烟者更有可能发生 MRSA 肺炎,优势比:7.0(p=0.02)。当考虑无吸烟史且 MRSA 鼻拭子阴性的非吸烟者时,NPV 为 100%。这是迄今为止唯一一项评估 MRSA 鼻拭子和危险因素数据在指导创伤患者经验性 VAP 抗生素治疗中的作用的研究。研究发现吸烟是 MRSA 肺炎的危险因素。建议结合使用 MRSA 鼻拭子和吸烟状态来指导经验性使用 MRSA 覆盖抗生素药物,因为 NPV 为 100%。如果使用,多达 68%的患者可能可以安全地避免使用 MRSA 覆盖抗生素药物及其相关不良反应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验