Institute of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; Division of Respiratory-Allergy Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea.
Department of Immunology and Rheumatology, Nepean Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Sep;9(9):3442-3449.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.03.054. Epub 2021 Apr 16.
Patients who suffered drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptom (DRESS) during the treatment of tuberculosis (TB) commonly experience multidrug hypersensitivity reactions resulting in limited anti-TB drug choices. Therefore, reintroduction based on a desensitization protocol may be an option to resume anti-TB medication.
To evaluate the outcomes and safety of resuming anti-TB drugs according to reintroduction methods in patients with anti-TB drug-related DRESS.
A retrospective cohort of patients who had experienced anti-TB drug-related severe cutaneous adverse reactions from 2011 to 2017 was established from separate 5 institutions.
Anti-TB medication was resumed in 27 of 29 patients with anti-TB drug-related DRESS through complete changing regimen (n = 9), reintroduction by a graded challenge (n = 5), or reintroduction using a desensitization protocol (n = 13). Nine patients completely changed their anti-TB regimen to second-line TB drugs, but only 1 (11.1%) succeeded in maintaining new anti-TB drugs. The other 8 failed to take drugs due to the occurrence of hypersensitivity reactions to the newly introduced anti-TB drugs. Two (40.0%) of 5 patients who underwent graded rechallenges successfully completed anti-TB drugs, whereas 3 (60%) failed to resume anti-TB drugs due to the recurrence of hypersensitivity reactions. In 13 patients who resumed anti-TB drugs using a desensitization protocol, no one who underwent desensitization developed recurrence of DRESS; 11 (84.6%) eventually completed anti-TB treatment and 2 eventually failed to complete anti-TB treatment due to late-onset itching and drug-induced liver injury.
Resuming anti-TB medication based on desensitization protocols may be a safe and effective option for those with anti-TB drug-related DRESS.
结核病(TB)治疗期间发生药物反应伴嗜酸性粒细胞增多和全身症状(DRESS)的患者通常会出现多种药物过敏反应,导致抗 TB 药物选择有限。因此,根据脱敏方案重新引入可能是恢复抗 TB 药物治疗的一种选择。
评估根据重新引入方法在抗 TB 药物相关 DRESS 患者中恢复使用抗 TB 药物的结果和安全性。
从 5 个不同的机构中建立了一个回顾性队列,其中包括 2011 年至 2017 年期间经历过抗 TB 药物相关严重皮肤不良反应的患者。
29 例抗 TB 药物相关 DRESS 患者中有 27 例通过完全改变方案(n=9)、分级挑战重新引入(n=5)或脱敏方案重新引入(n=13)恢复了抗 TB 治疗。9 例患者完全改变了他们的抗 TB 方案,改用二线 TB 药物,但只有 1 例(11.1%)成功维持了新的抗 TB 药物。其他 8 例由于对新引入的抗 TB 药物发生过敏反应而无法服用药物。5 例接受分级再挑战的患者中,有 2 例(40.0%)成功完成了抗 TB 药物治疗,而另外 3 例(60%)由于过敏反应复发而无法恢复抗 TB 药物治疗。在 13 例使用脱敏方案重新引入抗 TB 药物的患者中,没有一人发生 DRESS 复发;11 例(84.6%)最终完成了抗 TB 治疗,2 例最终因迟发性瘙痒和药物性肝损伤而无法完成抗 TB 治疗。
基于脱敏方案重新引入抗 TB 药物可能是治疗抗 TB 药物相关 DRESS 的一种安全有效的选择。