• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

建筑和拆除废物处置政策实施效果的模拟分析。

Simulation analysis of implementation effects of construction and demolition waste disposal policies.

机构信息

School of Management Engineering, Shandong Jianzhu University, PR China.

China Railway 14TH Bureau Group Co., Ltd, PR China.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2021 May 1;126:684-693. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.03.056. Epub 2021 Apr 17.

DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2021.03.056
PMID:33872977
Abstract

Urban development generates large amounts of construction and demolition waste, and the enactment of various policies is an important way to increase resource efficiency. It is urgent to analyse the choices and effects of construction and demolition waste disposal policies around the world. This study analyses and compares the implementation effects of various construction and demolition waste disposal policies and provides suggestions on the selection and formulation of different disposal method policies. A BP neural network and an agent-based model are used to construct a simulation model for the implementation effects of construction and demolition waste disposal policies. The average acceptance willingness is analysed for the three disposal methods of reduction, reuse and recycling under the different policies based on questionnaire survey data. Simulation results show that the implementation effect of the incentive policy as a single policy is superior, and the comprehensive implementation effect of the guidance-incentive-mandatory policy as a combined policy is superior. The implementation effect of combined policies is better than that of single policies. The policies suitable for different disposal methods are inconsistent. Information interaction can effectively improve the implementation effects of different construction and demolition waste disposal policies, especially for single policies. This study innovatively compares the various construction and demolition waste disposal policies and explain the interaction during their implementation. The findings can help the government formulate policies at different stages of construction and demolition waste management and provide a new approach to policy simulation research.

摘要

城市发展产生了大量的建筑和拆除垃圾,制定各种政策是提高资源效率的重要途径。分析全球建筑和拆除垃圾处理政策的选择和效果迫在眉睫。本研究分析和比较了各种建筑和拆除垃圾处理政策的实施效果,并就不同处理方法政策的选择和制定提供了建议。本文使用 BP 神经网络和基于主体的模型构建了建筑和拆除垃圾处理政策实施效果的仿真模型。基于问卷调查数据,分析了不同政策下减少、再利用和回收三种处理方法的平均接受意愿。模拟结果表明,激励政策作为单一政策的实施效果较好,指导-激励-强制政策作为组合政策的综合实施效果较好。组合政策的实施效果优于单一政策。适合不同处理方法的政策并不一致。信息交互可以有效提高不同建筑和拆除垃圾处理政策的实施效果,特别是对单一政策。本研究创新性地比较了各种建筑和拆除垃圾处理政策,并解释了实施过程中的相互作用。研究结果可以帮助政府在建筑和拆除垃圾管理的不同阶段制定政策,并为政策模拟研究提供新途径。

相似文献

1
Simulation analysis of implementation effects of construction and demolition waste disposal policies.建筑和拆除废物处置政策实施效果的模拟分析。
Waste Manag. 2021 May 1;126:684-693. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.03.056. Epub 2021 Apr 17.
2
Spatial autocorrelation, influencing factors and temporal distribution of the construction and demolition waste disposal industry.空间自相关、影响因素与建筑和拆除废物处理行业的时间分布。
Waste Manag. 2021 May 15;127:158-167. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.04.025. Epub 2021 May 1.
3
Promoting construction and demolition waste recycling by using incentive policies in China.在中国,利用激励政策促进建筑和拆除废物的回收利用。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jul;29(35):53844-53859. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-19536-w. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
4
System dynamic analysis of construction waste recycling industry chain in China.中国建筑废弃物循环产业链的系统动力学分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Oct;27(30):37260-37277. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-06739-x. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
5
Building demolition waste management through smart BIM: A case study in Hong Kong.通过智能建筑信息模型实现建筑拆除废物管理:以香港为例。
Waste Manag. 2022 Apr 15;143:69-83. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2022.02.027. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
6
Economic benefit analysis of the carbon potential of construction waste resource management based on a simulation of carbon trading policy.基于碳交易政策模拟的建筑废弃物资源管理碳潜力经济收益分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Aug;30(36):85986-86009. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-28417-9. Epub 2023 Jul 3.
7
Incentive Mechanism and Subsidy Design for Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling under Information Asymmetry with Reciprocal Behaviors.信息不对称下互惠行为的建筑和拆除废物回收激励机制与补贴设计。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 17;17(12):4346. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124346.
8
Improving Contractors' Participation of Resource Utilization in Construction and Demolition Waste through Government Incentives and Punishments.通过政府奖惩措施提高承包商在建筑与拆除废弃物资源利用中的参与度
Environ Manage. 2022 Oct;70(4):666-680. doi: 10.1007/s00267-022-01617-8. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
9
Economic benefits of construction waste recycling enterprises under tax incentive policies.税收激励政策下建筑废弃物回收企业的经济效益。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Feb;29(9):12574-12588. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13831-8. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
10
An empirical study of construction and demolition waste generation and implication of recycling.建筑和拆除废物产生及其回收利用的影响的实证研究。
Waste Manag. 2019 Jul 15;95:10-21. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.05.049. Epub 2019 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Decision-making of construction workers' waste reduction behavior: a study based on Cost-Benefit Theory and Cumulative Prospect Theory.建筑工人减少废物行为的决策:基于成本效益理论和累积前景理论的研究
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 20;16:1557736. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1557736. eCollection 2025.
2
Is Policy the Necessary or Sufficient Driving Force of Construction and Demolition Waste Recycling Industry Development? Experience from China.政策是推动建筑废弃物循环利用产业发展的必要条件还是充分条件?来自中国的经验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Mar 10;20(6):4936. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20064936.
3
Identifying the implementation effect of technology transfer policy using system dynamics: a case study in Liaoning, China.
运用系统动力学识别技术转移政策的实施效果:以中国辽宁为例
J Technol Transf. 2022 Dec 29:1-29. doi: 10.1007/s10961-022-09989-z.