Consultant Cardiac Anaesthesia, Raheja Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Anesthesia, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.
Ann Card Anaesth. 2021 Apr-Jun;24(2):163-171. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_28_20.
Effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) can be represented by 3D echocardiographic vena contracta cross-sectional area (3D-VCA) as a reference method for the quantification of mitral regurgitation (MR) without making any geometrical assumptions. EROA can also be derived from 3D PISA technique with a hemispherical (HS) or hemielliptical (HE) assumption of the proximal flow convergence. However, it is not clear whether HS-PISA and HE-PISA has better agreement with 3D-VCA.
This study was conducted to compare the EROA and Rvol obtained from 3D-VCA with those obtained from 2D-VC, 2D-HS-PISA, 3D-HS-PISA, and 3D-HE-PISA.
Tertiary care hospital.
Prospective observational study.
After anesthesia induction, 43 consecutive patients were evaluated with RT-3D-TEE after acquiring images from midesophegeal views and performing the offline analysis of volume dataset. 3D-VCA was measured using multiplanar reconstruction mode and EROA and regurgitant volume were estimated using HS-PISA and HE-PISA methods. The HE-PISA was calculated by using the Knud Thomsen formula.
Agreement between methods to estimate EROA and regurgitant volumes were tested using Bland-Altman analysis. The interobserver variability and intraobserver variability were assessed using an intraclass correlation coefficient.
The EROA estimated by 3D-VCA was larger than EROA obtained by 2D-HS-PISA and 3D-HS-PISA, which were significantly greater than 3D-HE-PISA. 3D-HS-PISA-EROA showed the best agreement with 3D-VCA (bias: 0.21; limits of agreement: -0.01 to 0.41; SD: 0.1). Correlation between various methods as compared to 3D-VCA was better in the organic MR group than functional MR group.
3D-HS-PISA showed the best agreement with 3D-VCA compared to other PISA methods. Better correlation between PISA-EROA and 3D-VCA was observed in patients with organic MR than functional MR.
有效反流口面积(EROA)可以通过 3D 超声心动图收缩期峡部横截面积(3D-VCA)来表示,作为定量二尖瓣反流(MR)的参考方法,而无需进行任何几何假设。EROA 也可以通过 3D PISA 技术从近端血流汇聚的半球形(HS)或半椭圆形(HE)假设中得出。然而,目前尚不清楚 HS-PISA 和 HE-PISA 是否与 3D-VCA 具有更好的一致性。
本研究旨在比较 3D-VCA 得出的 EROA 和反流容积与 2D-VC、2D-HS-PISA、3D-HS-PISA 和 3D-HE-PISA 得出的 EROA 和反流容积。
三级保健医院。
前瞻性观察性研究。
在麻醉诱导后,连续评估 43 例患者,在获得中食道视图图像并对容积数据集进行离线分析后,使用 RT-3D-TEE 进行检查。使用多平面重建模式测量 3D-VCA,并使用 HS-PISA 和 HE-PISA 方法估计 EROA 和反流容积。HE-PISA 通过使用 Knud Thomsen 公式计算。
使用 Bland-Altman 分析检验估计 EROA 和反流容积的方法之间的一致性。使用组内相关系数评估观察者间和观察者内变异性。
3D-VCA 估计的 EROA 大于 2D-HS-PISA 和 3D-HS-PISA 得出的 EROA,而 2D-HS-PISA 和 3D-HS-PISA 得出的 EROA 又明显大于 3D-HE-PISA。3D-HS-PISA-EROA 与 3D-VCA 的一致性最好(偏倚:0.21;一致性界限:-0.01 至 0.41;SD:0.1)。与 3D-VCA 相比,有机 MR 组中各种方法之间的相关性优于功能性 MR 组。
与其他 PISA 方法相比,3D-HS-PISA 与 3D-VCA 的一致性最好。在有机 MR 患者中,PISA-EROA 与 3D-VCA 之间的相关性更好。