Suppr超能文献

二维与三维经食管超声心动图定量评估二尖瓣反流的术中比较。

Intraoperative comparison of 2D versus 3D transesophageal echocardiography for quantitative assessment of mitral regurgitation.

机构信息

Consultant Cardiac Anaesthesia, Raheja Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Department of Anesthesia, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.

出版信息

Ann Card Anaesth. 2021 Apr-Jun;24(2):163-171. doi: 10.4103/aca.ACA_28_20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Effective regurgitant orifice area (EROA) can be represented by 3D echocardiographic vena contracta cross-sectional area (3D-VCA) as a reference method for the quantification of mitral regurgitation (MR) without making any geometrical assumptions. EROA can also be derived from 3D PISA technique with a hemispherical (HS) or hemielliptical (HE) assumption of the proximal flow convergence. However, it is not clear whether HS-PISA and HE-PISA has better agreement with 3D-VCA.

AIMS

This study was conducted to compare the EROA and Rvol obtained from 3D-VCA with those obtained from 2D-VC, 2D-HS-PISA, 3D-HS-PISA, and 3D-HE-PISA.

SETTING

Tertiary care hospital.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After anesthesia induction, 43 consecutive patients were evaluated with RT-3D-TEE after acquiring images from midesophegeal views and performing the offline analysis of volume dataset. 3D-VCA was measured using multiplanar reconstruction mode and EROA and regurgitant volume were estimated using HS-PISA and HE-PISA methods. The HE-PISA was calculated by using the Knud Thomsen formula.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

Agreement between methods to estimate EROA and regurgitant volumes were tested using Bland-Altman analysis. The interobserver variability and intraobserver variability were assessed using an intraclass correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

The EROA estimated by 3D-VCA was larger than EROA obtained by 2D-HS-PISA and 3D-HS-PISA, which were significantly greater than 3D-HE-PISA. 3D-HS-PISA-EROA showed the best agreement with 3D-VCA (bias: 0.21; limits of agreement: -0.01 to 0.41; SD: 0.1). Correlation between various methods as compared to 3D-VCA was better in the organic MR group than functional MR group.

CONCLUSION

3D-HS-PISA showed the best agreement with 3D-VCA compared to other PISA methods. Better correlation between PISA-EROA and 3D-VCA was observed in patients with organic MR than functional MR.

摘要

背景

有效反流口面积(EROA)可以通过 3D 超声心动图收缩期峡部横截面积(3D-VCA)来表示,作为定量二尖瓣反流(MR)的参考方法,而无需进行任何几何假设。EROA 也可以通过 3D PISA 技术从近端血流汇聚的半球形(HS)或半椭圆形(HE)假设中得出。然而,目前尚不清楚 HS-PISA 和 HE-PISA 是否与 3D-VCA 具有更好的一致性。

目的

本研究旨在比较 3D-VCA 得出的 EROA 和反流容积与 2D-VC、2D-HS-PISA、3D-HS-PISA 和 3D-HE-PISA 得出的 EROA 和反流容积。

设置

三级保健医院。

设计

前瞻性观察性研究。

材料和方法

在麻醉诱导后,连续评估 43 例患者,在获得中食道视图图像并对容积数据集进行离线分析后,使用 RT-3D-TEE 进行检查。使用多平面重建模式测量 3D-VCA,并使用 HS-PISA 和 HE-PISA 方法估计 EROA 和反流容积。HE-PISA 通过使用 Knud Thomsen 公式计算。

统计学分析

使用 Bland-Altman 分析检验估计 EROA 和反流容积的方法之间的一致性。使用组内相关系数评估观察者间和观察者内变异性。

结果

3D-VCA 估计的 EROA 大于 2D-HS-PISA 和 3D-HS-PISA 得出的 EROA,而 2D-HS-PISA 和 3D-HS-PISA 得出的 EROA 又明显大于 3D-HE-PISA。3D-HS-PISA-EROA 与 3D-VCA 的一致性最好(偏倚:0.21;一致性界限:-0.01 至 0.41;SD:0.1)。与 3D-VCA 相比,有机 MR 组中各种方法之间的相关性优于功能性 MR 组。

结论

与其他 PISA 方法相比,3D-HS-PISA 与 3D-VCA 的一致性最好。在有机 MR 患者中,PISA-EROA 与 3D-VCA 之间的相关性更好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d99/8253015/957d94ff4b83/ACA-24-163-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验