• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种基于光束投影的改进伽马分析方案,用于临床可解释的治疗前剂量验证。

A Beam Projection-Based Modified Gamma Analysis Scheme for Clinically Interpretable Pre-Treatment Dose Verification.

作者信息

Wang Yiling, Yin Gang, Wang Jie, Zhao Yue, Liu Min, Lang Jinyi

机构信息

Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China.

The First People's Hospital of Liangshan, Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Sichuan, China.

出版信息

Dose Response. 2021 Apr 8;19(2):15593258211001676. doi: 10.1177/15593258211001676. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.

DOI:10.1177/15593258211001676
PMID:33889062
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8040583/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate a novel gamma analysis system for dose verification results in terms of clinical significance.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The modified scheme redefined the computational domain of the conventional gamma analysis with the projections of beams and the regions of interest (ROI). We retrospectively studied 6 patients with the conventional and the modified gamma analysis schemes while compared their performances. The cold spots ratio of the planning target volume (PTV) and the hot spots ratio of the organs at risk (OAR) were also computed by the modified scheme to assess the clinical significance.

RESULTS

The result of the gamma passing rate in the modified method was conformable to that in the conventional method with a cut-off threshold of 5%. The cold spots ratio of PTV and hot spots ratio of OAR were able to be evaluated by the modified scheme. For an introduced 7.1% dose error, the discrimination ratio in gamma passing rate of the conventional method was lower than 2%, while it was improved to 5% by the modified method.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified gamma analysis scheme had a comparable quality as the conventional scheme in terms of dose inspection. Besides, it could improve the clinical significance of the QA result and provide the assessment for ROI-specific discrepancy. The modified scheme could also be conveniently integrated into the conventional dose verification process, benefiting the less developed regions where high-end 3D dose verification devices are not affordable.

摘要

目的

从临床意义方面研究一种用于剂量验证结果的新型伽马分析系统。

方法和材料

改进方案通过射束投影和感兴趣区域(ROI)重新定义了传统伽马分析的计算域。我们回顾性研究了6例采用传统和改进伽马分析方案的患者,并比较了它们的性能。还通过改进方案计算了计划靶体积(PTV)的冷点比率和危及器官(OAR)的热点比率,以评估临床意义。

结果

改进方法中伽马通过率的结果与传统方法在截止阈值为5%时的结果一致。改进方案能够评估PTV的冷点比率和OAR的热点比率。对于引入的7.1%剂量误差,传统方法在伽马通过率方面的辨别率低于2%,而改进方法将其提高到了5%。

结论

改进的伽马分析方案在剂量检查方面与传统方案具有相当的质量。此外,它可以提高质量保证结果的临床意义,并为特定ROI差异提供评估。改进方案还可以方便地集成到传统剂量验证过程中,有利于那些负担不起高端3D剂量验证设备的欠发达地区。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd0e/8040583/508d4537f1aa/10.1177_15593258211001676-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd0e/8040583/1926464f8db1/10.1177_15593258211001676-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd0e/8040583/94741b0a79be/10.1177_15593258211001676-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd0e/8040583/15c431685093/10.1177_15593258211001676-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd0e/8040583/508d4537f1aa/10.1177_15593258211001676-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd0e/8040583/1926464f8db1/10.1177_15593258211001676-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd0e/8040583/94741b0a79be/10.1177_15593258211001676-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd0e/8040583/15c431685093/10.1177_15593258211001676-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dd0e/8040583/508d4537f1aa/10.1177_15593258211001676-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
A Beam Projection-Based Modified Gamma Analysis Scheme for Clinically Interpretable Pre-Treatment Dose Verification.一种基于光束投影的改进伽马分析方案,用于临床可解释的治疗前剂量验证。
Dose Response. 2021 Apr 8;19(2):15593258211001676. doi: 10.1177/15593258211001676. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.
2
Moving from gamma passing rates to patient DVH-based QA metrics in pretreatment dose QA.从伽马通过率转移到预处理剂量 QA 中的基于患者剂量体积直方图(DVH)的 QA 指标。
Med Phys. 2011 Oct;38(10):5477-89. doi: 10.1118/1.3633904.
3
A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.一种用于治疗交付验证的三维初始注量重建与应用方法。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017 Jan;18(1):128-138. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12017. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
4
Biological consequences of MLC calibration errors in IMRT delivery and QA.调强放射治疗(IMRT)交付和质量保证(QA)中 MLC 校准误差的生物学后果。
Med Phys. 2012 Apr;39(4):1917-24. doi: 10.1118/1.3692177.
5
Are gamma passing rate and dose-volume histogram QA metrics correlated?伽马通过率和剂量-体积直方图 QA 度量是否相关?
Med Phys. 2021 Sep;48(9):4743-4753. doi: 10.1002/mp.15142. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
6
Dose-shaping using targeted sparse optimization.使用靶向稀疏优化进行剂量塑形。
Med Phys. 2013 Jul;40(7):071711. doi: 10.1118/1.4808363.
7
On the new metrics for IMRT QA verification.关于调强放射治疗质量保证验证的新指标。
Med Phys. 2016 Nov;43(11):6058. doi: 10.1118/1.4964796.
8
Treatment planning strategy for whole-brain radiotherapy with hippocampal sparing and simultaneous integrated boost for multiple brain metastases using intensity-modulated arc therapy.使用调强弧形放疗对多发脑转移瘤进行海马区保护及同步整合加量的全脑放疗治疗计划策略
Med Dosim. 2016;41(4):315-322. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2016.08.001. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
9
DVH analysis using a transmission detector and model-based dose verification system as a comprehensive pretreatment QA tool for VMAT plans: Clinical experience and results.使用传输探测器和基于模型的剂量验证系统进行DVH分析作为容积调强放疗计划的综合预处理质量保证工具:临床经验与结果
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019 Nov;20(11):80-87. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12743. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
10
Initial experience of ArcCHECK and 3DVH software for RapidArc treatment plan verification.用于容积旋转调强治疗计划验证的ArcCHECK和3DVH软件的初步经验。
Med Dosim. 2014 Autumn;39(3):276-81. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2014.04.004.

本文引用的文献

1
Error Detection in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance Using Radiomic Analysis of Gamma Distributions.基于伽马分布放射组学分析的调强放射治疗质量保证中的误差检测。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018 Sep 1;102(1):219-228. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.05.033. Epub 2018 May 19.
2
Tolerance limits and methodologies for IMRT measurement-based verification QA: Recommendations of AAPM Task Group No. 218.调强放射治疗(IMRT)测量验证 QA 的容忍限度和方法:AAPM 工作组第 218 号报告的建议。
Med Phys. 2018 Apr;45(4):e53-e83. doi: 10.1002/mp.12810. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
3
Evaluation of patient DVH-based QA metrics for prostate VMAT: correlation between accuracy of estimated 3D patient dose and magnitude of MLC misalignment.
基于患者剂量体积直方图(DVH)的前列腺容积调强放疗(VMAT)质量保证指标评估:估计的三维患者剂量准确性与多叶准直器(MLC)错位幅度之间的相关性
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 May 8;16(3):5251. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i3.5251.
4
Retrospective review of locally set tolerances for VMAT prostate patient specific QA using the COMPASS(®) system.使用COMPASS(®)系统对局部设置的容积调强放射治疗前列腺患者特定质量保证公差进行回顾性分析。
Phys Med. 2015 Nov;31(7):792-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.03.017. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
5
ROC analysis in patient specific quality assurance.ROC 分析在患者特异性质量保证中的应用。
Med Phys. 2013 Apr;40(4):042103. doi: 10.1118/1.4795757.
6
Pretreatment patient-specific IMRT quality assurance: a correlation study between gamma index and patient clinical dose volume histogram.预处理患者特定调强放疗质量保证:伽玛指数与患者临床剂量体积直方图的相关性研究。
Med Phys. 2012 Dec;39(12):7626-34. doi: 10.1118/1.4767763.
7
Development of a novel ArcCHECK(™) insert for routine quality assurance of VMAT delivery including dose calculation with inhomogeneities.开发新型的 ArcCHECK(™)插件,用于常规的 VMAT 交付质量保证,包括不均匀性剂量计算。
Med Phys. 2012 Jul;39(7):4203-8. doi: 10.1118/1.4728222.
8
A quality assurance method that utilizes 3D dosimetry and facilitates clinical interpretation.一种利用三维剂量学并有助于临床解读的质量保证方法。
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Oct 1;84(2):540-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.12.015. Epub 2012 Feb 22.
9
Moving from gamma passing rates to patient DVH-based QA metrics in pretreatment dose QA.从伽马通过率转移到预处理剂量 QA 中的基于患者剂量体积直方图(DVH)的 QA 指标。
Med Phys. 2011 Oct;38(10):5477-89. doi: 10.1118/1.3633904.
10
Comparison of four commercial devices for RapidArc and sliding window IMRT QA.比较四种商业设备在 RapidArc 和滑动窗口调强放疗 QA 中的应用。
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2011 Apr 4;12(2):3367. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v12i2.3367.