Suppr超能文献

不同任务负荷下注意力的自上而下控制

Top-down control of attention under varying task loads.

作者信息

Jo Suhyeon, Kim Joo Yeon, Han Suk Won

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

Department of Research Equipment Operation, Korea Basic Science Institute, Cheong-won, Ochang, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 May;216:103310. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103310. Epub 2021 Apr 20.

Abstract

The performance of a goal-directed task is often interrupted by task-irrelevant distractors. This distractor interference has well been demonstrated in a large body of studies employing the Eriksen flanker paradigm. A notable finding regarding this issue is that distractor interference is attenuated by increased perceptual load or the presence of non-target stimuli diluting distractors. Besides increased perceptual load or the presence of diluters, we hypothesized that either suppression of distractor or enhancement of target via top-down attentional control would also contribute to modulating distractor interference. To test this, we had participants identify a target stimulus while ignoring a distractor under three different conditions; under low load, only the target and distractor was presented, while under high load, the target was surrounded by non-target letters. In the dilution condition, the target was accompanied by non-targets, whose colors were distinct from the target. Importantly, following the task stimuli, a probe stimulus was presented either in the target location, non-target location, or distractor location. As results, under low load, attention was captured by the target stimulus in a bottom-up manner at the early stage of processing. By contrast, in the high load and dilution conditions, attention was focused on the target in a top-down manner. Taken together, we suggest that increasing perceptual load or presenting diluters incentivizes the establishment of top-down bias toward the target stimulus, which plays a role in attenuating distractor interference.

摘要

目标导向任务的执行常常会被与任务无关的干扰物打断。在大量采用埃里克森侧翼范式的研究中,这种干扰物干扰已得到充分证明。关于这个问题的一个显著发现是,通过增加感知负荷或存在稀释干扰物的非目标刺激,可以减弱干扰物干扰。除了增加感知负荷或存在稀释物外,我们假设通过自上而下的注意力控制抑制干扰物或增强目标也有助于调节干扰物干扰。为了验证这一点,我们让参与者在三种不同条件下识别目标刺激,同时忽略干扰物;在低负荷条件下,只呈现目标和干扰物,而在高负荷条件下,目标被非目标字母包围。在稀释条件下,目标伴有颜色与目标不同的非目标。重要的是,在任务刺激之后,在目标位置、非目标位置或干扰物位置呈现一个探测刺激。结果显示,在低负荷条件下,注意力在加工的早期阶段以自下而上的方式被目标刺激捕获。相比之下,在高负荷和稀释条件下,注意力以自上而下的方式集中在目标上。综上所述,我们认为增加感知负荷或呈现稀释物会促使建立对目标刺激的自上而下偏向,这在减弱干扰物干扰中起作用。

相似文献

1
Top-down control of attention under varying task loads.
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2021 May;216:103310. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103310. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
2
Top-Down Processes Override Bottom-Up Interference in the Flanker Task.
Psychol Sci. 2016 May;27(5):651-8. doi: 10.1177/0956797616631737. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
3
Perceptual load vs. dilution: the roles of attentional focus, stimulus category, and target predictability.
Front Psychol. 2013 Jun 7;4:327. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00327. eCollection 2013.
5
Processing overlap-dependent distractor dilution rather than perceptual target load determines attentional selectivity.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Nov;80(8):2048-2059. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1545-4.
6
Where have we gone wrong? Perceptual load does not affect selective attention.
Vision Res. 2010 Jun 18;50(13):1292-8. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.04.018. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
7
Steady-state signatures of visual perceptual load, multimodal distractor filtering, and neural competition.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2011 May;23(5):1113-24. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21460. Epub 2010 Feb 10.
9
The role of perceptual load in processing distractor faces.
Psychol Sci. 2003 Sep;14(5):510-5. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.03453.
10
Distinct Mechanisms for Distractor Suppression and Target Facilitation.
J Neurosci. 2016 Feb 10;36(6):1797-807. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2133-15.2016.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验