Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Medicine, Keiyu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan; Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Sagamihara, Japan.
Lung Cancer. 2021 Jun;156:59-67. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.04.013. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
Optimal second-line chemotherapy for patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer remains debatable. In addition to topotecan or amrubicin monotherapy, re-challenge with first-line platinum-doublets have been commonly used. In this study, we investigated whether platinum-doublets are suitable as second-line treatment for relapsed small-cell lung cancer.
Studies that enrolled relapsed small-cell lung cancer and compared platinum-doublets with non-platinum-based regimens for second-line treatment were identified using PubMed and EMBASE. A meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the relative risk of objective response rate and disease control rate of the second-line chemotherapy. Subgroup analyses were conducted to focus on comparison with standard second-line regimens and sensitive relapse. Progression-free and overall survival, and adverse events were systematically reviewed.
Ten studies published between 2011 and 2020 were included in our analysis with a total of 1222 patients: 438 treated with platinum-doublets and 784 with non-platinum-based regimens. The objective response rates for second-line platinum-doublet and non-platinum regimens were 47.3 % [95 % CI: 40.5-54.0] and 31.5 % [95 % CI: 22.2-40.8], respectively. Patients treated with platinum-doublets had a significantly higher objective response rate than patients with non-platinum-based regimens (RR [95 % CI]: 1.527 [1.100-2.121], p = 0.011), as well as disease control rate (RR [95 % CI]: 1.152 [1.052-1.262], p = 0.002). In a subgroup analysis comparing platinum-doublets with topotecan or amrubicin, patients treated with platinum-doublets had significantly higher objective response rate and disease control rate (RR [95 % CI]: 1.663 [1.055-2.619], p = 0.028 and 1.170 [1.021-1.340], p = 0.023 respectively). Progression-free and overall survival appeared consistent with the tumor responses. Adverse events associated with platinum-doublets appeared acceptable compared with the monotherapies.
Platinum-doublet chemotherapy as second-line treatment for patients with relapsed small-cell lung cancer can be considered as a reasonable option in comparison with non-platinum regimens.
对于复发性小细胞肺癌患者,最佳二线化疗仍存在争议。除拓扑替康或氨柔比星单药治疗外,常用一线铂类双联药物再挑战。本研究旨在探讨铂类双联药物是否适合作为复发性小细胞肺癌的二线治疗。
使用 PubMed 和 EMBASE 检索纳入复发性小细胞肺癌并比较铂类双联药物与非铂类药物二线治疗的研究。采用荟萃分析计算二线化疗客观缓解率和疾病控制率的相对风险。进行亚组分析,重点比较与标准二线方案和敏感复发的比较。系统评价无进展生存期和总生存期以及不良事件。
本研究共纳入 10 项 2011 年至 2020 年发表的研究,共 1222 例患者:438 例接受铂类双联药物治疗,784 例接受非铂类药物治疗。二线铂类双联药物和非铂类药物的客观缓解率分别为 47.3%[95%CI:40.5-54.0]和 31.5%[95%CI:22.2-40.8]。与非铂类药物治疗组相比,铂类双联药物治疗组患者的客观缓解率显著更高(RR[95%CI]:1.527[1.100-2.121],p=0.011),疾病控制率也更高(RR[95%CI]:1.152[1.052-1.262],p=0.002)。在比较铂类双联药物与拓扑替康或氨柔比星的亚组分析中,铂类双联药物治疗组患者的客观缓解率和疾病控制率显著更高(RR[95%CI]:1.663[1.055-2.619],p=0.028 和 1.170[1.021-1.340],p=0.023)。无进展生存期和总生存期似乎与肿瘤反应一致。与单药治疗相比,铂类双联药物相关不良事件似乎可以接受。
与非铂类方案相比,铂类双联药物作为复发性小细胞肺癌患者的二线治疗可被视为合理选择。