Suppr超能文献

Fototest与简易认知筛查量表联合应用于认知障碍的诊断准确性及预测效度

Diagnostic accuracy and predictive validity of associated use of Fototest and Mini-Cog in cognitive impairment.

作者信息

Carnero-Pardo C, López-Alcalde S, Florido-Santiago M, Espinosa-García M, Rego-García I, Calle-Calle R, Carrera-Muñoz I, de la Vega-Cotarelo R

机构信息

FIDYAN Neurocenter, Granada, España.

FIDYAN Neurocenter, Granada, España.

出版信息

Neurologia (Engl Ed). 2021 Apr 22. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2021.01.017.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Fototest and Mini-Cog include all the domains that are necessary in a cognitive assessment. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the combined use of both instruments for detecting cognitive impairment.

METHODS

We performed a phase iii diagnostic accuracy study with 2 independent samples: STUDY, which included 448 participants randomly allocated to 2 datasets (BASE [80%] and TEST [20%]); and EXTERNAL, which included 61 participants. The index test was consecutive administration of the Fototest and Mini-Cog, and the reference test was formal cognitive assessment. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of two-step vs. consecutive application of the tests and simple (Comb-Simple), logistic regression (Comb-LR), and random decision tree (Comb-RDT) models of their combined use for detecting cognitive impairment (Global Deterioration Scale score ≥ 3). We performed an exploratory analysis of the BASE dataset, selecting criteria that maximise accuracy; a pre-specified analysis was used to evaluate the selected criteria in the TEST and EXTERNAL datasets.

RESULTS

The diagnostic accuracy (95% confidence interval) of the combined models in the BASE dataset (Comb-Simple: 88.3 [88.5-91.4]; Comb-LR: 91.6 [88.2-94.3]; Comb-RDT 95.2 [92.5-97.2]) was significantly higher than the individual values observed for the Mini-Cog and Fototest (81.6 [77.1-85.4] and 84.9 [80.8-88.5], respectively). These results were replicated in the TEST (Comb-Simple: 88.9; Comb-LR: 95.6; Comb-RDT: 92.2) and EXTERNAL datasets (Comb-Simple: 91.8; Comb-LR: 90.2; Comb-RDT: 88.5). Two-step application had the same diagnostic accuracy than consecutive application but required less time (mean [SD] of 197.3 s [56.7] vs. 233.9 s [45.2]; P<.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Combined application of the Fototest and Mini-Cog takes less than 4minutes and improves the diagnostic accuracy of both instruments. Two-step application is more efficient as it requires less time while maintaining the same diagnostic accuracy.

摘要

引言

Fototest和简易认知筛查量表(Mini-Cog)涵盖了认知评估所需的所有领域。本研究旨在评估联合使用这两种工具检测认知障碍的诊断准确性。

方法

我们对两个独立样本进行了一项III期诊断准确性研究:研究样本(STUDY),包括448名参与者,随机分配到两个数据集(基础数据集[80%]和测试数据集[20%]);以及外部样本(EXTERNAL),包括61名参与者。指标测试为连续进行Fototest和简易认知筛查量表测试,参考测试为正式的认知评估。我们评估了两步法与连续应用测试以及它们联合使用的简单(Comb-Simple)、逻辑回归(Comb-LR)和随机决策树(Comb-RDT)模型检测认知障碍(总体衰退量表评分≥3)的诊断准确性。我们对基础数据集进行了探索性分析,选择能使准确性最大化的标准;使用预先指定的分析方法在测试数据集和外部数据集中评估所选标准。

结果

基础数据集中联合模型的诊断准确性(95%置信区间)(Comb-Simple:88.3 [88.5 - 91.4];Comb-LR:91.6 [88.2 - 94.3];Comb-RDT 95.2 [92.5 - 97.2])显著高于简易认知筛查量表和Fototest各自观察到的值(分别为81.6 [77.1 - 85.4]和84.9 [80.8 - 88.5])。这些结果在测试数据集(Comb-Simple:88.9;Comb-LR:95.6;Comb-RDT:92.2)和外部数据集中得到了重复(Comb-Simple:91.8;Comb-LR:90.2;Comb-RDT:88.5)。两步法应用与连续应用具有相同的诊断准确性,但所需时间更少(平均[标准差]为197.3秒[56.7],而连续应用为233.9秒[45.2];P <.0001)。

结论

联合应用Fototest和简易认知筛查量表耗时不到4分钟,提高了两种工具的诊断准确性。两步法应用更高效,因为它在保持相同诊断准确性的同时所需时间更少。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical utility of Phototest via teleneuropsychology in Chilean rural older adults.
Dement Neuropsychol. 2022 Jul-Sep;16(3):316-323. doi: 10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2021-0082. Epub 2022 Jun 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验