Turning Point, Eastern Health, 110 Church St., Richmond, VIC 3121, Australia; National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia; The National Centre for Clinical Research on Emerging Drugs (NCCRED), University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, NSW 2300, Australia.
Addict Behav. 2021 Oct;121:106881. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106881. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
Engagement with face-to-face psychosocial interventions is often compromised in people using methamphetamine (MA), in the context of high rates of polysubstance use, mental health disorders, cognitive impairment and geographic isolation. Technology-mediated interventions offer flexible ways of engaging with treatment and are readily accessible. This mini-review evaluates evidence from eight studies for the effectiveness of telephone, mHealth (text-messaging and apps) and computer-based interventions for MA use. Two papers from one telephone counselling study showed a small improvement in MA-related outcomes, particularly for individuals in active use. However, a directive counselling style was associated with a higher likelihood of MA use during recovery for those higher in resistance to authority. Text-messaging interventions generally showed small but significant reductions in MA use in non-treatment seekers. When compared, there was no significant difference in level of MA use reduction between interactive, automated and self-monitoring text messages. Studies in other modalities (smartphone app, one trial; computer-based interventions, two trials) did not confer statistically significant reductions in MA use, though were likely impacted by app design and participant characteristics. Preliminary findings hint at the potential effectiveness of telephone counselling in aftercare and the capacity for text-messaging to reach those who are not in treatment. Given the small amount of existing literature, this review discusses the potential value of emerging interventions, the importance of adapting interventions to the characteristics of people who use MA and suggests specific directions for research in each technology modality.
面对面的心理社会干预在使用甲基苯丙胺(MA)的人群中往往难以进行,因为这些人常常同时使用多种物质、患有精神健康障碍、认知障碍和居住在偏远地区。技术介导的干预措施提供了灵活的治疗参与方式,且易于获取。本迷你综述评估了八项研究的证据,这些研究评估了电话、移动健康(短信和应用程序)和基于计算机的干预措施对 MA 使用的有效性。一项电话咨询研究的两份论文表明,与 MA 相关的结果有较小但有意义的改善,特别是对于正在积极使用 MA 的个体。然而,对于那些更抗拒权威的个体,指令式咨询风格与康复期间 MA 使用的可能性增加有关。短信干预措施通常可显著减少非治疗寻求者的 MA 使用,但减少的程度较小。当进行比较时,互动式、自动化和自我监测短信之间的 MA 使用减少程度没有显著差异。其他模式(智能手机应用程序,一项试验;基于计算机的干预措施,两项试验)的研究并未显著减少 MA 的使用,但可能受到应用程序设计和参与者特征的影响。初步研究结果表明,电话咨询在康复后护理中可能具有潜在的有效性,而短信干预可能有能力接触到未接受治疗的人群。鉴于现有文献数量较少,本综述讨论了新兴干预措施的潜在价值,强调了根据 MA 使用人群的特点调整干预措施的重要性,并为每种技术模式的研究提出了具体方向。