Matsuda Junya, Takano Hitoshi, Morooka Masaki, Imori Yoichi, Nakata Jun, Kitamura Mitsunobu, Tara Shuhei, Tokita Yukichi, Yamamoto Takeshi, Takayama Morimasa, Shimizu Wataru
Division of Cardiovascular Intensive Care, Nippon Medical School Hospital.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School.
Circ J. 2021 Aug 25;85(9):1481-1491. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-1191. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
Alcohol septal ablation (ASA) is a treatment option in patients with drug-refractory symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). In many patients, right bundle branch block (RBBB) develops during ASA because septal branches supply the right bundle branch. However, the clinical significance of procedural RBBB is uncertain.
We retrospectively reviewed 184 consecutive patients with HOCM who underwent ASA. We excluded 40 patients with pre-existing RBBB (n=10), prior pacemaker implantation (n=15), mid-ventricular obstruction type (n=10), and those lost to follow-up (n=5), leaving 144 patients for analysis. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the development (n=95) or not (n=49) of procedural RBBB. ASA conferred significant decreases in the left ventricular pressure gradient (LVPG) in both the RBBB and no-RBBB group (from 74±48 to 27±27 mmHg [P<0.001] and from 75±45 to 31±33 mmHg [P<0.001], respectively). None of the RBBB patients developed further conduction system disturbances. The percentage reduction in LVPG at 1 year after the procedure was significantly greater in the RBBB than no-RBBB group (66±24% vs. 49±45%; P=0.035). Procedural RBBB was not associated with pacemaker implantation after ASA, but was associated with reduction in repeat ASA (odds ratio 0.34; 95% confidence interval 0.13-0.92; P=0.045).
Although RBBB frequently occurs during the ASA procedure, it does not adversely affect clinical outcomes.
酒精间隔消融术(ASA)是药物难治性症状性肥厚性梗阻性心肌病(HOCM)患者的一种治疗选择。在许多患者中,由于间隔支供应右束支,ASA过程中会出现右束支传导阻滞(RBBB)。然而,术中RBBB的临床意义尚不确定。
我们回顾性分析了184例连续接受ASA的HOCM患者。我们排除了40例已有RBBB的患者(n = 10)、先前植入起搏器的患者(n = 15)、心室中部梗阻型患者(n = 10)以及失访患者(n = 5),最终纳入144例患者进行分析。根据术中是否发生RBBB将患者分为两组(发生组n = 95,未发生组n = 49)。RBBB组和无RBBB组的左心室压力阶差(LVPG)在ASA后均显著降低(分别从74±48 mmHg降至27±27 mmHg [P<0.001]和从75±45 mmHg降至31±33 mmHg [P<0.001])。RBBB患者均未出现进一步的传导系统紊乱。术后1年,RBBB组LVPG降低的百分比显著高于无RBBB组(66±24% vs. 49±45%;P = 0.035)。术中RBBB与ASA后起搏器植入无关,但与再次接受ASA的减少有关(比值比0.34;95%置信区间0.13 - 0.92;P = 0.045)。
尽管RBBB在ASA过程中经常发生,但它对临床结局没有不利影响。