Suppr超能文献

复发性前向不稳合并严重肩胛盂骨缺损患者肩胛盂骨块的非刚性固定:一项系统评价

Non-rigid fixation of the glenoid bone block for patients with recurrent anterior instability and major glenoid bone loss: A systematic review.

作者信息

Malahias Michael-Alexander, Mitrogiannis Leonidas, Gerogiannis Dimitrios, Chronopoulos Efstathios, Kaseta Maria-Kyriaki, Antonogiannakis Emmanouil

机构信息

3rd Orthopaedic Department, Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece.

Orthopaedic Department, Evangelismos General Hospital, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Shoulder Elbow. 2021 Apr;13(2):168-180. doi: 10.1177/1758573219872512. Epub 2019 Sep 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

New types of glenoid bone block fixation, involving suture buttons, suture anchors or even implant-free impaction of the graft, have been recently introduced. In contrast to screws which allow for a rigid fixation of the bone block, these alternative procedures provide a non-rigid type of fixation.

METHODS

Two reviewers independently conducted the search in a systematic way (according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) using the MEDLINE/PubMed database and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. These databases were queried with the terms "Latarjet" OR "Eden-Hybbinette" OR "bone block" AND "anterior" AND "shoulder" AND "instability."

RESULTS

Eight out of the 325 initial studies were finally chosen according to our inclusion-exclusion criteria. In total, 750 patients were included in this review. The overall anterior instability recurrence rate for patients treated with non-rigid fixation was 2.6%, while the overall rate of non-union or graft osteolysis was 5.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of the graft type, bone block non-rigid fixation showed satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability with substantial glenoid bone deficiency. Furthermore, non-rigid fixation resulted in adequate bone graft healing and osseous incorporation. Lastly, given the relative lack of data, further prospective controlled studies are required to assess bone block non-rigid fixation procedures in comparison with the traditional rigid (with screws) fixation techniques.

LEVEL

Systematic review, IV.

摘要

背景

新型的关节盂骨块固定方法,包括使用缝线纽扣、缝线锚钉,甚至是无植入物的骨块嵌压,最近已被引入。与允许骨块刚性固定的螺钉不同,这些替代方法提供了一种非刚性的固定方式。

方法

两名评价者按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA),以系统的方式独立进行检索,使用MEDLINE/PubMed数据库和Cochrane系统评价数据库。使用“Latarjet”或“Eden-Hybbinette”或“骨块”以及“前方”和“肩部”和“不稳定”等术语对这些数据库进行查询。

结果

根据我们的纳入和排除标准,最终从325项初始研究中选择了8项。本综述共纳入750例患者。采用非刚性固定治疗的患者总体前方不稳定复发率为2.6%,而骨不连或植骨骨溶解的总体发生率为5.4%。

结论

无论植骨类型如何,骨块非刚性固定在治疗伴有严重关节盂骨缺损的前方肩部不稳定方面显示出令人满意的临床和功能结果。此外,非刚性固定导致植骨愈合良好且骨融合充分。最后,鉴于相对缺乏数据,需要进一步进行前瞻性对照研究,以评估骨块非刚性固定方法与传统刚性(螺钉)固定技术相比的效果。

级别

系统评价,IV级

相似文献

2
Sutures, Screws, Buttons, and Anchors: A Review of Current Bone Graft Fixation Devices for Glenoid Bone Loss in the Unstable Shoulder.
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2024 Jun;17(6):207-221. doi: 10.1007/s12178-024-09895-x. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
3
All-arthroscopic, guided Eden-Hybbinette procedure using suture-button fixation for revision of failed Latarjet.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Nov;28(11):e377-e388. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.03.022. Epub 2019 Jul 19.
4
Arthroscopic versus open Latarjet: a step-by-step comprehensive and systematic review.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 Jul;29(5):957-966. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02398-3. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
5
Arthroscopic Latarjet: Suture-Button Fixation Is a Safe and Reliable Alternative to Screw Fixation.
Arthroscopy. 2019 Apr;35(4):1050-1061. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.11.012. Epub 2019 Mar 8.
8
A Systematic Review of Screw and Suture Button Glenoid Augmentation Constructs.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2023 Oct 12;11(10):23259671231186429. doi: 10.1177/23259671231186429. eCollection 2023 Oct.

引用本文的文献

4
Arthroscopic Distal Clavicle Bone Block Technique for Anteroinferior Instability With Critical Bone Loss.
Arthrosc Tech. 2023 May 11;12(6):e787-e794. doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2023.02.055. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Use of Cannulated Screws for Primary Latarjet Procedures.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Aug 25;10(8):23259671221117802. doi: 10.1177/23259671221117802. eCollection 2022 Aug.

本文引用的文献

2
Biomechanical Comparison of Screw Fixation Versus a Cortical Button and Self-tensioning Suture for the Latarjet Procedure.
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Jun 14;6(6):2325967118777842. doi: 10.1177/2325967118777842. eCollection 2018 Jun.
3
An arthroscopic bone block procedure is effective in restoring stability, allowing return to sports in cases of glenohumeral instability with glenoid bone deficiency.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Dec;26(12):3780-3787. doi: 10.1007/s00167-018-4921-7. Epub 2018 Apr 6.
5
Arthroscopic Latarjet procedure with double-button fixation: short-term complications and learning curve analysis.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2018 Jun;27(6):e189-e195. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2017.12.007. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
7
Preliminary clinical outcomes of Latarjet-Patte coracoid transfer by arthroscopy vs. open surgery: Prospective multicentre study of 390 cases.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Dec;102(8S):S271-S276. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Oct 19.
8
Coracoid bone block fixation with cortical buttons: An alternative to screw fixation?
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Dec;102(8):983-987. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2016.06.016. Epub 2016 Oct 5.
9
All-Arthroscopic Revision Eden-Hybinette Procedure for Failed Instability Surgery: Technique and Preliminary Results.
Arthroscopy. 2017 Jan;33(1):39-48. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.05.021. Epub 2016 Jul 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验