Jung Matthias K, Uzun Davut D, von Ehrlich-Treuenstätt Gregor V R, Grützner Paul A, Kreinest Michael
Zentrum für Wirbelsäulenchirurgie, Klinik für Unfallchirurgie und Orthopädie, BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Deutschland.
Klinik für Anästhesie und Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin, Schmerztherapie, Palliativmedizin, Marienhaus Klinikum Hetzelstift Neustadt/Weinstraße, 67434, Neustadt, Deutschland.
Anaesthesist. 2021 Nov;70(11):922-927. doi: 10.1007/s00101-021-00965-0. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
Immobilization of the cervical spine is a standard procedure in emergency medicine mostly achieved via a cervical collar. In the emergency room other forms of immobilization are utilized as cervical collars have certain drawbacks. The present study aimed to provide preliminary data on the efficiency of immobilization in the emergency room by analyzing the residual spinal motion of the patient's head on different kinds of head rests.
In the present study biomechanical motion data of the cervical spine of a test subject were analyzed. The test subject was placed in a supine position on a mobile stretcher (Stryker M1 Roll-In System, Kalamazoo, MI, USA) wearing a cervical collar (Perfit ACE, Ballerup, Denmark). Three different head rests were tested: standard pillow, concave pillow and cavity pillow. The test subject carried out a predetermined motion protocol: right side inclination, left side inclination, flexion and extension. The residual spinal motion was recorded with wireless motion trackers (inertial measurement unit, Xsens Technologies, Enschede, The Netherlands). The first measurement was performed without a cervical collar or positioning on the pillows to measure the physiological baseline motion. Subsequently, three measurements were taken with the cervical collar applied and the pillows in place. From these measurements, a motion score was calculated that can represent the motion of the cervical spine.
When the test subject's head was positioned on a standard pillow the physiological motion score was reduced from 69 to 40. When the test subject's head was placed on concave pillow the motion score was further reduced from 69 to 35. When the test subject's head was placed on cavity pillow the motion score was reduced from 69 to 59. The observed differences in the overall motion score of the cervical spine are mainly due to reduced flexion and extension rather than rotation or lateral inclination.
The motion score of the cervical spine using motion sensors can provide important information for future analyses. The results of the present study suggest that trauma patients can be immobilized in the early trauma phase with a cervical collar and a head rest. The application of a cervical collar and the positioning on the concave pillow may achieve a good immobilization of the cervical spine in trauma patients in the early trauma phase.
颈椎固定是急诊医学中的标准程序,大多通过颈托来实现。在急诊室,由于颈托存在某些缺点,会采用其他形式的固定方法。本研究旨在通过分析患者头部在不同类型头枕上的脊柱残余运动,提供有关急诊室中固定效率的初步数据。
在本研究中,分析了一名受试者颈椎的生物力学运动数据。受试者戴着颈托(Perfit ACE,丹麦巴勒鲁普)仰卧在移动担架(Stryker M1 Roll-In System,美国密歇根州卡拉马祖)上。测试了三种不同的头枕:标准枕头、凹形枕头和空腔枕头。受试者执行预定的运动方案:右侧倾斜、左侧倾斜、屈曲和伸展。使用无线运动追踪器(惯性测量单元,荷兰埃因霍温的Xsens Technologies)记录脊柱残余运动。第一次测量是在不戴颈托或未放置在枕头上的情况下进行,以测量生理基线运动。随后,在戴上颈托并放置好枕头的情况下进行了三次测量。根据这些测量结果,计算出一个可以代表颈椎运动的运动评分。
当受试者的头部放在标准枕头上时,生理运动评分从69降至40。当受试者的头部放在凹形枕头上时,运动评分进一步从69降至35。当受试者的头部放在空腔枕头上时,运动评分从69降至59。观察到的颈椎整体运动评分差异主要是由于屈曲和伸展减少,而非旋转或侧倾。
使用运动传感器得出的颈椎运动评分可为未来分析提供重要信息。本研究结果表明,创伤患者在创伤早期可通过颈托和头枕进行固定。在创伤早期,使用颈托并将头部放置在凹形枕头上可能会实现对创伤患者颈椎的良好固定。