Effect of diltiazem on infarct size, reperfusion flow and flow reserve: the effect of timing of treatment.

This study was performed to determine if improved subendocardial reflow seen with diltiazem pretreatment after left circumflex coronary (LCX) occlusion is due to a direct vasodilatory effect of diltiazem on the reperfused bed or due to an increased flow maximum or reserve. In the first part of this study anesthetized dogs were subjected to saline or diltiazem (infused starting before, 10 min after LCX occlusion or 2 min before reperfusion; 0.18 mg/kg + 0.45 mg/kg/hr i.v. for all groups) treatment with a 90-min LCX occlusion and 5-hr reperfusion and myocardial blood flow and infarct size were determined at the end of the experiment. In the second part, maximal flow using intracoronary adenosine was determined at 1 and 3 hr postreperfusion in the ischemic bed when pretreated with saline or diltiazem. Myocardial infarct size was reduced significantly only in animals pretreated with diltiazem compared to saline-treated animals. At 1-hr postreperfusion, subendocardial flow (microspheres) was significantly higher only with diltiazem pretreatment compared to the saline group (100 +/- 17 vs. 54 +/- 8 ml/min/100 g, respectively) and subendocardial reperfusion flows were negatively correlated to infarct size (r = 0.97, P less than .05). Thus, diltiazem only improves reflow and infarct size when infused before occlusion and this improved reflow does not occur via a direct vasodilator action of diltiazem. When maximal vasodilating doses of adenosine were given, flow in the ischemic region was nearly identical for saline and diltiazem pretreated groups despite higher preadenosine flows in the diltiazem group (higher resting flow occurred at the expense of the existing flow reserve).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)