Suppr超能文献

COVID-19 相关心包炎:系统综述。

Pericarditis in patients with COVID-19: a systematic review.

机构信息

Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Lima, Peru.

Asociación para el Desarrollo de la Investigación Estudiantil en Ciencias de la Salud (ADIECS), Lima, Peru.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2021 Sep 1;22(9):693-700. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001202.

Abstract

AIMS

We performed a systematic review to summarize the clinical features, diagnostic methods, treatment, and outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients with pericarditis.

METHODS

We searched electronic databases from inception to 17 December 2020. Studies that reported clinical data on patients with COVID-19 and pericarditis were included. Descriptive statistics were used for categorical and continuous variables [mean ± standard deviation or median (interquartile range)]. As an exploratory analysis, differences between patients with acute pericarditis and myopericarditis were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 33 studies (32 case reports and 1 case series) involving 34 patients were included. The mean age was 51.6 ± 19.5 years and 62% of patients were men. Sixty-two percentage of patients were diagnosed with myopericarditis. The most frequent electrocardiographic pattern (56%) was diffuse ST-elevation and PR depression. Pericardial effusion and cardiac tamponade were reported in 76 and 35% of cases, respectively. The median values of C-reactive protein [77 mg/dl (12-177)] and white blood cells [12 335 cells/μl (5625-16 500)] were above the normal range. Thirty-eight percent and 53% of patients were treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and colchicine, respectively. These drugs were more frequently used in patients with acute pericarditis compared with myopericarditis. The in-hospital mortality was 6% without a significant difference between both groups.

CONCLUSION

Our review shows that COVID-19 patients with pericarditis had similar clinical features to other viral cardiotropic infections. However, NSAIDs and colchicine were used in half or less of the cases. Overall, the short-term prognosis was good across groups.

摘要

目的

我们进行了一项系统评价,以总结患有心包炎的 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者的临床特征、诊断方法、治疗和结局。

方法

我们从创建到 2020 年 12 月 17 日检索了电子数据库。纳入了报告 COVID-19 患者心包炎临床数据的研究。对于分类和连续变量,使用描述性统计[平均值±标准差或中位数(四分位距)]。作为探索性分析,比较了急性心包炎和心肌心包炎患者之间的差异。

结果

共纳入 33 项研究(32 例病例报告和 1 例病例系列),共涉及 34 例患者。平均年龄为 51.6±19.5 岁,62%的患者为男性。62%的患者被诊断为心肌心包炎。最常见的心电图模式(56%)是弥漫性 ST 段抬高和 PR 压低。分别有 76%和 35%的病例报告有心包积液和心脏压塞。C 反应蛋白[77mg/dl(12-177)]和白细胞[12335 个/μl(5625-16500)]的中位数均高于正常值。38%和 53%的患者分别接受了非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和秋水仙碱治疗。与心肌心包炎患者相比,这两种药物在急性心包炎患者中更常使用。住院死亡率为 6%,两组之间无显著差异。

结论

我们的综述表明,COVID-19 合并心包炎患者的临床特征与其他病毒性心脏感染相似。然而,半数或更少的病例使用了 NSAIDs 和秋水仙碱。总体而言,各组的短期预后均良好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验