Suppr超能文献

开发和验证一种用于检测电子问题列表中纵向不一致性的模型。

Developing and Validating a Model for Detecting Longitudinal Inconsistencies in the Electronic Problem List.

机构信息

University of Utah, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Salt Lake City, UT.

Intermountain Healthcare, Clinical Informatics, Salt Lake City, UT.

出版信息

AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2021 Jan 25;2020:563-572. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

Clinicians from different care settings can distort the problem list from conveying a patient's actual health status, affecting quality and patient safety. To measure this effect, a reference standard was built to derive a problem-list based model. Real-world problem lists were used to derive an ideal categorization cutoff score. The model was tested against patient records to categorize problem lists as either having longitudinal inconsistencies or not. The model was able to successfully categorize these events with ~87% accuracy, ~83% sensitivity, and ~89% specificity. This new model can be used to quantify intervention effects, can be reported in problem list studies, and can be used to measure problem list changes based on policy, workflow, or system changes.

摘要

来自不同护理环境的临床医生可能会扭曲问题清单,无法准确反映患者的实际健康状况,从而影响医疗质量和患者安全。为了衡量这种影响,我们构建了一个参考标准,以便根据问题清单建立一个基于模型的诊断。我们使用真实世界的问题清单得出了一个理想的分类截断分数。我们使用该模型来测试患者记录,以将问题清单归类为是否存在纵向不一致。该模型能够以约 87%的准确率、约 83%的灵敏度和约 89%的特异性成功地对这些事件进行分类。这个新模型可以用于量化干预效果,可以在问题清单研究中报告,也可以用于根据政策、工作流程或系统变化来衡量问题清单的变化。

相似文献

2
Impact of problem-based charting on the utilization and accuracy of the electronic problem list.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2018 May 1;25(5):548-554. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx154.
3
Automated problem list generation and physicians perspective from a pilot study.
Int J Med Inform. 2017 Sep;105:121-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 Jun 4.
4
Problem list completeness in electronic health records: A multi-site study and assessment of success factors.
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Oct;84(10):784-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
5
Problem management module: an innovative system to improve problem list workflow.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2014 Nov 14;2014:661-70. eCollection 2014.
6
Data quality of electronic medical records in Manitoba: do problem lists accurately reflect chronic disease billing diagnoses?
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Nov;23(6):1107-1112. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw013. Epub 2016 Apr 23.

本文引用的文献

2
Problem list completeness in electronic health records: A multi-site study and assessment of success factors.
Int J Med Inform. 2015 Oct;84(10):784-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
3
Problem management module: an innovative system to improve problem list workflow.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2014 Nov 14;2014:661-70. eCollection 2014.
5
Use of an electronic problem list by primary care providers and specialists.
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Aug;27(8):968-73. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2033-5. Epub 2012 Mar 17.
6
Improving completeness of electronic problem lists through clinical decision support: a randomized, controlled trial.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012 Jul-Aug;19(4):555-61. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2011-000521. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
7
Problem list guidance in the EHR.
J AHIMA. 2011 Sep;82(9):52-8.
8
Clinician attitudes toward and use of electronic problem lists: a thematic analysis.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2011 May 25;11:36. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-36.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验