Cardiac Clinic, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa. Email:
Cardiac Clinic, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
Cardiovasc J Afr. 2021;32(4):193-197. doi: 10.5830/CVJA-2021-010. Epub 2021 Apr 19.
The rate of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantation in low- and middle-income countries is increasing. Patients recieving these devices are frequently older and with multiple co-morbidities, which may later lead to complications requiring CIED removal. CIED removals are associated with life-threatening complications. However, high sucesss rates are reported in high-income countries. The purpose of this study was to report on the experience of CIED removal in a resource-constrained setting.
In this retrospective study, we included consecutive adult patients admitted to Groote Schuur Hospital and the University of Cape Town Private Academic Hospital for CIED removal from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2019.
During the study period, 53 patients underwent CIED removal (26 extractions and 27 explants). The patients had a mean (standard deviation) age of 59.1 (16.0) years. A history of systemic hypertension was present in 50.9% of patients, diabetes mellitus in 30.2% and dilated cardiomyopathy in 47.2%. Complete heart block was the leading indication for CIED implantation (37.7%), and device infection was the leading indication for removal (69.2%). CIEDs were removed after a median (interquantile range) of 243 (53-831) days. There were 40 leads extracted and 35 explants. Lead extractions were perfomed in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory under general anaesthesia via a percutaneous transvenous superior approach. There was one major and one minor complication related to lead extraction.
CIED infections were the primary indication for CIED removal in a tertiary referral centre in South Africa. Despite being a low-volume centre, we report a high percutaneous transvenous extraction success rate with low complication rate; results which are comparable to high-volume centres.
在中低收入国家,心脏植入式电子设备(CIED)的植入率正在上升。接受这些设备的患者通常年龄较大,合并多种合并症,这可能导致需要移除 CIED 的并发症。CIED 移除与危及生命的并发症有关。然而,在高收入国家报告了较高的成功率。本研究的目的是报告在资源有限的环境下进行 CIED 移除的经验。
在这项回顾性研究中,我们纳入了 2008 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日期间因 CIED 移除而入住 Groote Schuur 医院和开普敦大学私立学术医院的连续成年患者。
在研究期间,53 名患者接受了 CIED 移除(26 例取出和 27 例取出)。患者的平均(标准差)年龄为 59.1(16.0)岁。50.9%的患者有高血压病史,30.2%的患者有糖尿病,47.2%的患者有扩张型心肌病。完全性心脏传导阻滞是 CIED 植入的主要指征(37.7%),感染是 CIED 移除的主要指征(69.2%)。CIED 的中位(四分位距)移除时间为 243(53-831)天。共取出 40 根导线,取出 35 根植入物。导线取出是在心脏导管实验室全身麻醉下经经皮经静脉上腔途径进行的。有 1 例主要并发症和 1 例轻微并发症与导线取出有关。
在南非的一个三级转诊中心,CIED 感染是 CIED 移除的主要指征。尽管该中心是一个低容量中心,但我们报告了高经皮经静脉提取成功率和低并发症率;结果与高容量中心相当。