Suppr超能文献

用于评估对经胫骨假肢满意度的检查表。

CHECKLIST USE FOR ASSESSMENT OF SATISFACTION WITH TRANS-TIBIAL PROSTHESES.

作者信息

Baars Erwin C, Geertzen Jan H, Dijkstra Pieter U

机构信息

De Vogellanden, Centre for Rehabilitation, Zwolle, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

University Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Rehabil Med Clin Commun. 2021 Apr 29;4:1000057. doi: 10.2340/20030711-1000057. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess satisfaction of prosthesis users with their prostheses, and the problems they experience with the residual limb, using a checklist, in order to evaluate potential benefits of checklist use and to summarize issues and problems with the prosthesis and/or residual limb presented by prosthesis users.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SUBJECTS

Participants were adult trans-tibial prosthesis users ( = 82) and certified prosthetist orthotist ( = 19) experienced in fitting lower-limb prostheses.

METHODS

Prosthesis users reported their reasons for consultation and factors concerning prosthesis (dis)satisfaction and residual limb problems, using a checklist. Checklist use was evaluated by certified prosthetist orthotists and prosthesis users and the significance of evaluation scores was determined.

RESULTS

Checklist use identified 126 issues/problems, most of which concerned prosthesis fit (33%) and pressure points on the residual limb skin (26%). Evaluation scores were significantly higher than neutral regarding the checklist helping the certified prosthetist orthotist to gather more information and to make clear with which issues the prosthesis user was dissatisfied. Prosthesis users reported that checklist use made them feel more understood by the certified prosthetist orthotist.

CONCLUSION

Checklist use in the assessment of trans-tibial prostheses is beneficial in identifying factors related to dissatisfaction, and improves the quality of certified prosthetist orthotists' consultation. The implementation of checklist use is, however, challenging.

摘要

目的

使用一份检查表评估假肢使用者对其假肢的满意度以及他们在残肢方面遇到的问题,以评估使用检查表的潜在益处,并总结假肢使用者提出的与假肢和/或残肢相关的问题。

设计

横断面研究。

对象

参与者为成年经胫假肢使用者(n = 82)以及有下肢假肢装配经验的认证假肢矫形师(n = 19)。

方法

假肢使用者使用一份检查表报告他们咨询的原因以及与假肢(不)满意和残肢问题相关的因素。认证假肢矫形师和假肢使用者对检查表的使用进行评估,并确定评估分数的意义。

结果

检查表的使用识别出126个问题,其中大多数涉及假肢适配(33%)和残肢皮肤的压痛点(26%)。在检查表帮助认证假肢矫形师收集更多信息以及明确假肢使用者对哪些问题不满意方面,评估分数显著高于中性分数。假肢使用者报告称,使用检查表让他们感觉认证假肢矫形师更能理解他们。

结论

在经胫假肢评估中使用检查表有助于识别与不满意相关的因素,并提高认证假肢矫形师咨询的质量。然而,检查表的实施具有挑战性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0ebe/8091939/8450b70c8d49/JRMCC-4-1000057-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
CHECKLIST USE FOR ASSESSMENT OF SATISFACTION WITH TRANS-TIBIAL PROSTHESES.
J Rehabil Med Clin Commun. 2021 Apr 29;4:1000057. doi: 10.2340/20030711-1000057. eCollection 2021.
2
Suction socket suspension for below-knee amputees.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1986 Mar;67(3):196-9. doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(86)90089-4.
3
Prosthesis satisfaction in a national sample of Veterans with upper limb amputation.
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2020 Apr;44(2):81-91. doi: 10.1177/0309364619895201. Epub 2020 Jan 21.
4
A Literature Review of the Quality of Life, Health Status and Prosthesis Satisfaction in Older Patients With A Trans-tibial Amputation.
Can Prosthet Orthot J. 2020 May 21;2(1):33640. doi: 10.33137/cpoj.v3i1.33640. eCollection 2020.
5
Does actively enlarging socket volume during resting facilitate residual limb fluid volume recovery in trans-tibial prosthesis users?
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2020 Aug;78:105001. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2020.105001. Epub 2020 May 4.
7
Influence of the scale reduction in designing sockets for trans-tibial amputees.
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2020 Aug;234(8):761-768. doi: 10.1177/0954411920921648. Epub 2020 May 30.
8
The changing demographics of the orthotist/prosthetist workforce in Australia: 2007, 2012 and 2019.
Hum Resour Health. 2021 Mar 17;19(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12960-021-00581-4.
9
Osseointegrated Prosthetic Implants for People With Lower-Limb Amputation: A Health Technology Assessment.
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2019 Dec 12;19(7):1-126. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Prosthesis satisfaction in lower limb amputees: A systematic review of associated factors and questionnaires.
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Sep;97(39):e12296. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012296.
2
Stakeholder perspectives for possible residual limb monitoring system for persons with lower-limb amputation.
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Jan;42(1):63-70. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1492634. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
3
Ten years of the Surgical Safety Checklist.
Br J Surg. 2018 Jul;105(8):927-929. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10907. Epub 2018 May 17.
4
The Gap between Individual Perception and Compliance: A Qualitative Follow-Up Study of the Surgical Safety Checklist Application.
PLoS One. 2016 Feb 29;11(2):e0149212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149212. eCollection 2016.
5
The Problem With Patient Satisfaction Scores.
Fam Pract Manag. 2016 Jan-Feb;23(1):23-7.
7
Clinicians' perspectives on decision making in lower limb amputee rehabilitation.
J Rehabil Med. 2014 May;46(5):447-53. doi: 10.2340/16501977-1791.
8
Implementation of checklists in health care; learning from high-reliability organisations.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011 Oct 3;19:53. doi: 10.1186/1757-7241-19-53.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验