Department of Public Health Sciences.
Department of Human Development and Family Science.
J Fam Psychol. 2021 Oct;35(7):994-1006. doi: 10.1037/fam0000862. Epub 2021 May 6.
In this article, several dyadic analyses are applied to illustrate how they can be used to answer distinct research questions regarding associations between dyad members over time (longitudinal interdependence). This article focuses on how to conceptualize and empirically assess distinct dyadic processes, including time-sequential processes involving change in rank-order, parallel change processes involving intra-individual changes, dynamic dyadic processes involving both intra-individual changes and time-specific deviations (from intra-individual change), and accelerated dyadic processes involving acceleration of intra-individual change. These dyadic processes are depicted by four different dyadic models; a cross-lagged autoregressive model, a dyadic latent growth model (with and without structured residuals), and a dyadic latent change score model, respectively. These four longitudinal dyadic models are illustrated using a sample of 251 husbands and wives in enduring marriages. Each model focuses on a different dyadic process demonstrating distinct ways to empirically assess longitudinal interdependence; thus, when analyzing data, dyadic researchers must weigh the advantages and disadvantages of each and select the modeling approach that is most appropriate for the research question. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).
本文应用了几种对偶分析来举例说明它们如何用于回答关于对偶成员随时间变化的关联的不同研究问题(纵向相互依存)。本文重点介绍如何概念化和实证评估不同的对偶过程,包括涉及等级变化的时间序列过程、涉及个体内变化的平行变化过程、涉及个体内变化和特定时间偏差(来自个体内变化)的动态对偶过程,以及涉及个体内变化加速的加速对偶过程。这四种对偶过程分别由四个不同的对偶模型描述;交叉滞后自回归模型、对偶潜在增长模型(带和不带结构残差)以及对偶潜在变化分数模型。这四个纵向对偶模型使用 251 对持久婚姻中的丈夫和妻子的样本进行了说明。每个模型都侧重于不同的对偶过程,展示了实证评估纵向相互依存的不同方法;因此,在分析数据时,对偶研究人员必须权衡每种方法的优缺点,并选择最适合研究问题的建模方法。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。