• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

病例报告:确定多伦多大学儿童与青少年精神病学亚专业住院医师选拔中应优先考虑的申请人特质。

Case Report: Defining Applicant Attributes to Be Prioritized in the Selection of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Subspecialty Residents at the University of Toronto.

作者信息

Kulkarni Chetana A, Rasasingham Raj, Woods Nicole N, Gorman Daniel A, Szatmari Peter, Hanson Mark D

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Department of Psychiatry, Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 20;12:650317. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.650317. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.650317
PMID:33959054
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8093509/
Abstract

The child and adolescent psychiatry (CAP) subspecialty training program at the University of Toronto was among the first fully accredited CAP programs in Canada. As one of Canada's largest CAP subspecialty programs, we attract many excellent applicants annually. While objectivity and transparency in the selection of candidates have been valued, it was unclear which applicant attributes should be prioritized. This quality improvement project was undertaken to identify the key applicant attributes that should be prioritized for admission to the program. An initial list of attributes was compiled by project team members and feedback solicited. Through iterative design, this list was categorized into "end products," "branding attributes" and "generic attributes." The "end products" were removed as these represented outputs of training rather than attributes on which applicant selection should be based. Subsequent steps involved only the "branding" and "generic" attributes. A consensus-building exercise led to the creation of two short-lists of five attributes within each category. Finally, a paired-comparison forced choice methodology was used to determine the ranking of these attributes in order of importance when assessing applicants. The final lists of "generic" and "branding" attributes developed through a consensus-building exercise are presented in rank order based on the paired-comparison methodology. The overall response rate for the forced choice electronic survey was 49% of faculty and learners. This project used an iterative process of consensus building & pairwise comparison to prioritize key attributes for assessing trainee selection to the program. Going forward, these attributes will be incorporated into the file review and interview portions of our admissions process. In addition to emphasizing these priority attributes in admissions, there are implications for other aspects of the program including curriculum and faculty development, as well as guiding the overall mission and vision for the Division. A similar process could be undertaken by other training programs seeking to identify priority attributes for admission to their programs.

摘要

多伦多大学的儿童与青少年精神病学(CAP)专科培训项目是加拿大首批获得全面认证的CAP项目之一。作为加拿大最大的CAP专科项目之一,我们每年吸引众多优秀申请者。虽然在候选人选拔中重视客观性和透明度,但不清楚哪些申请者特质应被优先考虑。开展这个质量改进项目是为了确定该项目录取时应优先考虑的关键申请者特质。项目团队成员编制了一份特质初始清单并征求反馈意见。通过反复设计,这份清单被归类为“最终成果”“品牌特质”和“通用特质”。“最终成果”被剔除,因为它们代表的是培训产出,而非应作为申请者选拔依据的特质。后续步骤仅涉及“品牌”和“通用”特质。通过共识构建活动,在每个类别中创建了两份各包含五个特质的简短清单。最后,采用配对比较强制选择方法来确定这些特质在评估申请者时按重要性排序的名次。通过共识构建活动得出的“通用”和“品牌”特质最终清单,根据配对比较方法按名次顺序列出。强制选择电子调查的总体回复率为教职员工和学员的49%。本项目采用了反复的共识构建和成对比较过程,以确定评估学员进入该项目选拔的关键特质优先级。未来,这些特质将被纳入我们招生流程的档案审查和面试环节。除了在招生中强调这些优先特质外,该项目的其他方面也会受到影响,包括课程设置和师资发展,以及指导该部门的总体使命和愿景。其他寻求确定其项目录取优先特质的培训项目也可采用类似流程。

相似文献

1
Case Report: Defining Applicant Attributes to Be Prioritized in the Selection of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Subspecialty Residents at the University of Toronto.病例报告:确定多伦多大学儿童与青少年精神病学亚专业住院医师选拔中应优先考虑的申请人特质。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Apr 20;12:650317. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.650317. eCollection 2021.
2
Using a Consensus-Driven Approach to Incorporate Holistic Review Into an Internal Medicine Residency Program.采用共识驱动的方法将整体评估纳入内科住院医师培训计划。
J Grad Med Educ. 2023 Aug;15(4):469-474. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-22-00637.1.
3
Selecting Residents for Predetermined Factors Identified and Thought to be Important for Work Performance and Satisfaction: A Methodology.选择对工作绩效和满意度有重要影响的预定因素的住院医师:一种方法。
J Surg Educ. 2019 Jul-Aug;76(4):949-961. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.02.004. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
4
Applicant Characteristics Associated With Selection for Ranking at Independent Surgery Residency Programs.与独立外科住院医师培训项目排名选拔相关的申请人特征。
J Surg Educ. 2015 Nov-Dec;72(6):e123-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.04.021.
5
Applicants' Interview Experience of Family Medicine Residency Match: Reflections from a Quality Improvement Initiative at a Community Hospital.家庭医学住院医师匹配申请人的面试经历:来自社区医院质量改进计划的反思
Cureus. 2020 Oct 20;12(10):e11054. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11054.
6
Models of integrated training in psychiatry and child and adolescent psychiatry.精神病学与儿童及青少年精神病学的综合培训模式。
Acad Psychiatry. 2008 Sep-Oct;32(5):377-85. doi: 10.1176/appi.ap.32.5.377.
7
A survey of demographics, motivations, and backgrounds among applicants to the integrated 0 + 5 vascular surgery residency.一项针对综合 0+5 血管外科住院医师项目申请者的人口统计学、动机和背景调查。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Feb;51(2):496-502; discussion 502-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.08.076.
8
Association of Mentor-to-Program Contact and Applicant Rank Disclosure With Vitreoretinal Fellowship Applicant's Final Match Outcome in 2016 and 2017.2016 年和 2017 年导师与项目联系和申请人排名披露与玻璃体视网膜研究员申请人最终匹配结果的关联。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun 1;136(6):642-647. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.1107.
9
Increasing the enrolment of rural applicants to the faculty of medicine and addressing diversity by using a priority matrix approach to assign values to rural attributes.增加农村申请者进入医学院的人数,并通过使用优先级矩阵方法为农村属性赋值来解决多样性问题。
Rural Remote Health. 2011;11(2):1646. Epub 2011 May 23.
10
What Are We REALLY Looking for in a Letter of Recommendation?我们在推荐信中真正要寻找的是什么?
J Surg Educ. 2019 Nov-Dec;76(6):e118-e124. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.06.008. Epub 2019 Jul 11.

本文引用的文献

1
How Clinicians and Educators Can Mitigate Implicit Bias in Patient Care and Candidate Selection in Medical Education.临床医生和教育工作者如何减轻医学教育中患者护理和候选人选拔中的隐性偏见。
ATS Sch. 2020 Jun 23;1(3):211-217. doi: 10.34197/ats-scholar.2020-0024PS.
2
Branding and Recruitment: A Primer for Residency Program Leadership.品牌建设与招生:住院医师培训项目领导入门指南。
J Grad Med Educ. 2018 Jun;10(3):249-252. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-17-00602.1.
3
Strategies for Achieving Diversity through Medical School Admissions.通过医学院招生实现多元化的策略。
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2018;29(1):9-18. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2018.0002.
4
Multiple independent sampling within medical school admission interviewing: an "intermediate approach".医学院招生面试中的多次独立抽样:一种“中间方法”。
Perspect Med Educ. 2016 Oct;5(5):292-9. doi: 10.1007/s40037-016-0298-9.
5
Preparation for future learning: a missing competency in health professions education?为未来学习做准备:医学职业教育中的缺失能力?
Med Educ. 2016 Jan;50(1):115-23. doi: 10.1111/medu.12893.
6
Identifying and Promoting Best Practices in Residency Application and Selection in a Complex Academic Health Network.在复杂的学术健康网络中识别并推广住院医师申请与选拔的最佳实践。
Acad Med. 2015 Dec;90(12):1594-601. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000954.
7
The Multiple Mini-Interview (MMI) for student selection in health professions training - a systematic review.多站式面试(MMI)在卫生专业培训学生选拔中的应用 - 系统评价。
Med Teach. 2013 Dec;35(12):1027-41. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.829912. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
8
The roles of deliberate practice and innate ability in developing expertise: evidence and implications.刻意练习和先天能力在专长发展中的作用:证据和影响。
Med Educ. 2013 Oct;47(10):979-89. doi: 10.1111/medu.12260.
9
In-group bias in residency selection.群体内偏差与住院医选拔
Med Teach. 2013 Sep;35(9):747-51. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2013.801937. Epub 2013 Jun 27.
10
Modified personal interviews: resurrecting reliable personal interviews for admissions?修改后的个人访谈:为招生恢复可靠的个人访谈?
Acad Med. 2012 Oct;87(10):1330-4. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318267630f.