The chief medical residency in Canada: comparison of opinions between physicians-in-chief and chief medical residents.

We conducted a survey of physicians-in-chief (PCs) and chief medical residents (CMRs) in training programs throughout Canada to determine their attitudes toward the need for and role of CMRs in Canada and to rate the importance of CMR duties and attributes. Forty-three hospitals with 5 to 126 house staff in all eight provinces with medical schools were surveyed; 36 PCs (84%) and 29 CMRs (67%) returned a completed questionnaire. Compared with the CMRs the PCs preferred more prior training (p less than 0.03), estimated as significantly less the time spent by CMRs in required duties (p less than 0.05) and rated as more important the responsibilities of faculty-house staff liaison, house staff leader, house staff role model and teaching house staff (p less than 0.05) and the attributes of clinical judgement, medical knowledge, clinician model and research interests (p less than 0.03). All of the PCs and 97% of the CMRs rated the position as somewhat to very necessary; 83% of the PCs and 66% of the CMRs would not alter the present CMR roles. A total of 92% of the PCs felt that the position was very or somewhat advantageous with respect to a future private practice, compared with 67% of the CMRs (p less than 0.02). Increased administrative and committee duties, decreased teaching and future reductions in house staff were identified as major but reversible threats to the unique quality of the CMR position. We conclude that the CMR has a necessary, important and highly regarded role in Canadian university hospitals that could possibly be improved by regular review by the PC and CMR at each hospital to avoid the identified problems.