Department of Haematology, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare National Health Service Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Haematology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA, Australia.
Blood Adv. 2021 May 11;5(9):2426-2437. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021004665.
The dilemma of whether to treat elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with a full or reduced dose intensity (DI) of R-CHOP (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone+rituximab) is often faced by clinicians. We conducted a systematic review assessing the impact of R-CHOP DI on DLBCL survival outcomes, according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses for Protocols (PRISMA-P) guidelines. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL for studies with ≥100 patients treated with R-CHOP/R-CHOP-like therapies published from January 2002 through November 2020. Studies were included if they reported the impact of R-CHOP DI on survival outcomes. We screened records, extracted data, and reviewed all the studies for quality and statistical appraisal. Of 380 screened records, 13 studies including 5188 patients were reviewed. DI was often calculated as the ratio of the cumulative delivered dose of prespecified drug(s) to the cumulative planned dose multiplied by a time-correction factor. Lower DI (intended or relative) was associated with inferior survival in 7 of 9 studies reporting crude survival analyses. Multivariable analysis using DI as a covariate was performed in 10 studies. Six showed an association (P < .05) with adjustment for other covariates, and 4 did not. Most studies and those larger studies of higher quality showed poorer outcomes associated with reduced DI. In subgroups aged ≥80 years, survival was not consistently affected by reduced DI. DI-specific randomized trials are warranted, but these data support full-dose R-CHOP in elderly and fit patients aged <80 years with DLBCL, but not in those aged ≥80 years, where dose-reduced R-CHOP does not appear to compromise survival.
对于是否用 R-CHOP(环磷酰胺、多柔比星、长春新碱和泼尼松+利妥昔单抗)的全剂量或低剂量强度(DI)治疗老年弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL),临床医生常常面临两难选择。我们根据系统评价和荟萃分析优先报告的项目(PRISMA-P)指南,进行了一项系统评价,评估 R-CHOP DI 对 DLBCL 生存结果的影响。我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane CENTRAL,纳入了 2002 年 1 月至 2020 年 11 月发表的≥100 例接受 R-CHOP/R-CHOP 样治疗的患者的研究。如果研究报告了 R-CHOP DI 对生存结果的影响,则纳入研究。我们筛选了记录、提取了数据,并对所有研究进行了质量和统计学评估。在 380 篇筛选的记录中,有 13 项研究共纳入 5188 例患者。DI 通常计算为指定药物(s)的累积给予剂量与计划累积剂量的比值乘以时间校正因子。在 9 项报告未校正生存分析的研究中,有 7 项研究显示较低的 DI(预期或相对)与生存不良相关。在 10 项研究中使用 DI 作为协变量进行了多变量分析。其中 6 项研究在调整了其他协变量后显示出与 DI 的关联(P<0.05),4 项研究没有。大多数研究和更高质量的大样本研究显示,与降低 DI 相关的结局较差。在年龄≥80 岁的亚组中,生存并未受到降低 DI 的一致影响。需要进行 DI 特异性随机试验,但这些数据支持在年龄<80 岁的老年和身体状况良好的 DLBCL 患者中使用全剂量 R-CHOP,而不是在年龄≥80 岁的患者中使用降低剂量的 R-CHOP,因为后者似乎不会影响生存。