Mang Sebastian, Huss Niklas, Schäfers Hans-Joachim, Wehrfritz Holger, Massmann Alexander, Lensch Christian, Langer Frank, Seiler Frederik, Bals Robert, Lepper Philipp M
Department of Pneumology, Allergology and Critical Care Medicine, ECLS Center Saar, Saarland University Hospital, Homburg/Saar,Germany.
Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2021 Aug 18;33(3):402-408. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivab102.
Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung emphysema may benefit from surgical or endoscopic lung volume reduction (ELVR). Previously reported outcomes of nitinol coil-based ELVR techniques have been ambiguous. The analysis was done to analyse outcomes of ELVR with nitinol coils in patients with severe pulmonary emphysema.
From September 2013 to November 2014, our centre performed a total of 41 coil implantations on 29 patients with severe emphysema. Coils were bronchoscopically placed during general anaesthesia. Twelve out of 29 patients received staged contralateral treatments up to 112 days later to avoid bilateral pneumothorax. Lung function and 6-min walking distance were assessed 1 week prior, 1 week after as well as 6-12 months after the procedure. Patients were followed up to 48 months after ELVR and overall mortality was compared to a historic cohort.
While coil-based ELVR led to significant short-term improvement of vital capacity (VC, +0.14 ± 0.39 l, P = 0.032) and hyperinflation (Δ residual volume/total lung capacity -2.32% ± 6.24%, P = 0.022), no significant changes were observed in 6-min walking distance or forced expiratory volume in 1 s. Benefits were short-lived, with only 15.4% and 14.3% of patients showing sustained improvements in forced expiratory volume in 1 s or residual volume after 6 months. Adverse events included haemoptysis (40%) and pneumothorax (3.4%), major complications occurred in 6.9% of cases. Overall survival without lung transplant was 63.8% after 48 months following ELVR, differing insignificantly from what BODE indices of patients would have predicted as median 4-year survival (57%) at the time of ELVR treatment.
ELVR with coils can achieve small and short-lived benefits in lung function at the cost of major complications in a highly morbid cohort. Treatment failed to improve 4-year overall survival. ELVR coils are not worthwhile the risk for most patients with severe emphysema.
慢性阻塞性肺疾病和肺气肿患者可能从手术或内镜下肺减容术(ELVR)中获益。先前报道的基于镍钛合金线圈的ELVR技术的结果并不明确。本分析旨在分析镍钛合金线圈用于严重肺气肿患者的ELVR效果。
2013年9月至2014年11月,我们中心对29例严重肺气肿患者共进行了41次线圈植入。在全身麻醉下通过支气管镜放置线圈。29例患者中有12例在长达112天后接受了分期对侧治疗,以避免双侧气胸。在术前1周、术后1周以及术后6 - 12个月评估肺功能和6分钟步行距离。对患者进行ELVR后长达48个月的随访,并将总死亡率与一个历史队列进行比较。
虽然基于线圈的ELVR导致肺活量(VC,增加0.14±0.39升,P = 0.032)和肺过度充气(残余容积/肺总量变化-2.32%±6.24%,P = 0.022)有显著短期改善,但6分钟步行距离或1秒用力呼气量未观察到显著变化。益处是短暂的,6个月后仅15.4%和14.3%的患者1秒用力呼气量或残余容积有持续改善。不良事件包括咯血(40%)和气胸(3.4%),6.9%的病例发生了严重并发症。ELVR后48个月无肺移植的总生存率为63.8%,与ELVR治疗时患者的BODE指数预测的4年中位生存率(57%)无显著差异。
线圈ELVR可在高发病队列中以发生严重并发症为代价实现肺功能的微小且短暂的益处。该治疗未能改善4年总生存率。对于大多数严重肺气肿患者,ELVR线圈不值得冒此风险。